Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Relationship Analysis of Phenology, Stress Tolerance, and Mean Productivity in Wilt and Cold Stressed Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Following Synthetic PGRs Application

Satyendra Thakur; Gyanendra Tiwari; R. K. Samaiya; et al.

9
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To understand the phenotypic response to mitigate stress tolerance for achieving maximum mean productivity, a comparative study of four synthetic PGRs—Abscisic Acid (ABA), Naphthyl Acetic Acid (NAA), Salicylic Acid (SA), and Fusaric Acid (FA)—was conducted as a pot experiment against artificially inoculated Fusarium oxysporum (a wilt pathogen) and cold exposure in four chickpea varieties. Additionally, the relationship between traits and PGRS application was looked at to evaluate their role in the stress tolerance mechanism. The results showed that ABA at 5 and 2 ppm was effective in delaying flowering, therefore extending the vegetative development phase in plants. In this way, flowering promotes stress tolerance while evading the damaging impacts of wilting and cold. This resulted in a lower percentage of wilt and a reduced incidence of cold compared to all other treatments, which raised mean productivity. The use of ABA at 5 and 2 ppm has been shown to positively correlate with both the prolongation of vegetative development and the delay of flowering. But fusaric acid (FA), a fungal toxin, is what caused early flowering, which allowed the flower to coincide with the development of wilt and cold. The occurrence of wilt at seedling and cold during flowering accelerated the incidence of wilt and cold, which led to a reduced mean productivity after giving fusaric acid (FA) @ 10 and 20 ppm. According to the investigation, the application of fusaric acid (FA) at 10 and 20 ppm was found to be positively and highly correlated with an increase in the incidence of wilt and cold and consequently negatively correlated with the mechanism possessed by ABA at 5 and 2 ppm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA at 5 and 2 ppm delayed flowering in chickpea

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
ABA at 5 and 2 ppme1
Outcome
floweringe1
Direction
delayinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The results showed that ABA at 5 and 2 ppm was effective in delaying flowering, therefore extending the vegetative development phase in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–673 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA at 5 and 2 ppm gave a lower percentage of wilt in chickpea than all other treatments

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
ABA at 5 and 2 ppme1
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
percentage of wilte2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
all other treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“against artificially inoculated Fusarium oxysporum (a wilt pathogen) and cold exposure in four chickpea varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–390 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that ABA at 5 and 2 ppm was effective in delaying flowering, therefore extending the vegetative development phase in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–673 · show in text ↑
e2

“This resulted in a lower percentage of wilt and a reduced incidence of cold compared to all other treatments, which raised mean productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA at 5 and 2 ppm reduced the incidence of cold in chickpea compared with all other treatments

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
ABA at 5 and 2 ppme1
Outcome
incidence of colde2
Direction
reducede2
Comparator
all other treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The results showed that ABA at 5 and 2 ppm was effective in delaying flowering, therefore extending the vegetative development phase in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–673 · show in text ↑
e2

“This resulted in a lower percentage of wilt and a reduced incidence of cold compared to all other treatments, which raised mean productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA at 5 and 2 ppm raised mean productivity of chickpea

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
ABA at 5 and 2 ppme1
Outcome
mean productivitye2
Direction
raisede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The results showed that ABA at 5 and 2 ppm was effective in delaying flowering, therefore extending the vegetative development phase in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–673 · show in text ↑
e2

“This resulted in a lower percentage of wilt and a reduced incidence of cold compared to all other treatments, which raised mean productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA at 5 and 2 ppm was positively correlated with prolonged vegetative development and delayed flowering in chickpea

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
ABA at 5 and 2 ppme3
Outcome
prolongation of vegetative development and the delay of floweringe3
Direction
positively correlatee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The use of ABA at 5 and 2 ppm has been shown to positively correlate with both the prolongation of vegetative development and the delay of flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusaric acid caused early flowering in chickpea, so flowering coincided with wilt and cold

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
fusaric acid (FA)e4
Outcome
early floweringe4
Direction
causede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“But fusaric acid (FA), a fungal toxin, is what caused early flowering, which allowed the flower to coincide with the development of wilt and cold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusaric acid at 10 and 20 ppm was positively correlated with an increase in the incidence of wilt and cold in chickpea

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
fusaric acid (FA) at 10 and 20 ppme5
Outcome
incidence of wilt and colde5
Direction
increasee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the application of fusaric acid (FA) at 10 and 20 ppm was found to be positively and highly correlated with an increase in the incidence of wilt and cold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1598 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusaric acid at 10 and 20 ppm was negatively correlated with the mechanism possessed by ABA

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
fusaric acid (FA) at 10 and 20 ppme5
Outcome
the mechanism possessed by ABAe6
Direction
negatively correlatede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the application of fusaric acid (FA) at 10 and 20 ppm was found to be positively and highly correlated with an increase in the incidence of wilt and cold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1598 · show in text ↑
e6

“consequently negatively correlated with the mechanism possessed by ABA at 5 and 2 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1688 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusaric acid at 10 and 20 ppm was followed by a reduced mean productivity of chickpea

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
fusaric acid (FA) @ 10 and 20 ppme7
Outcome
mean productivitye7
Direction
reducede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“which led to a reduced mean productivity after giving fusaric acid (FA) @ 10 and 20 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1411 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑

(+)-abscisic acid · phenology · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

(+)-abscisic acid · Fusarium oxysporum · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Fusaric acid · phenology · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

(+)-abscisic acid · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.