Paper · 2024 · Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science

Activity of triticale rhizosphere enzymes during inoculation with microbial preparations

O. V. Perminova

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Recently, much attention has been paid to the problem of ecological farming in agricultural produc tion due to the increased interest in the production of safe products. The article presents the results of analyzing the dynamics of soil enzyme activity of hydrolases and oxidoreductases class at pre-sowing inoculation of winter triticale seeds (X Triticosecale Wittm. ex A. Camus) of the Bilinda variety with complex microbial preparations based on associative diazotrophic microorganisms. The following microbial preparations were used in the experiment: Flavobacterin (Flavobacterium sp., strain 30), Mizorin (Arthrobacter mysorens, strain 7), Agrophil (Agrobacterium radiobacter, strain 10), Rizobact RZHF (Corynebacterium sp., strain PBT 7) and FZHF (Pseudomonas sp., strain PBT 4). Soil samples were collected at three dates, which corresponded to the phases of booting, earing and wax ripeness. An increase in the urease activity was detected in the wax ripeness phase. The maximum level of the enzyme was recorded in the variants with application of Flavobacterin (30.7 mg NH3 per 10 g of soil) and Rizobact FZHF (30.2 mg NH3 per 10 g of soil). In the same phase, maximum phosphatase values were observed in the variant with application of Mizorin (2.9 mg P2 O5 ), and invertase in the variants with application of Agrophil (15.6 mg glucose) and Rizobact RZHF (16.7 mg glucose). The highest concentration of catalase was observed at the earing phase when Agrophil and Flavobacterin were used (respectively 3.8 and 3.4 ml of O2 released in 2 min per 1 g of soil). High rates of plant height and ear productivity were obtained in the variant with inoculation with Flavobacterin preparation. The increase relative to the control in this case amounted to: by plant height – 5.63%, by ear length – 5.3%, by number of grains – 16.7%, by grain weight per ear – 41.4%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil urease activity in triticale was maximal with Flavobacterin.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Organ / stage
wax ripeness phasee0
Treatment
Flavobacterine0
Outcome
urease activitye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
30.7 mg NH3 per 10 g of soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in the urease activity was detected in the wax ripeness phase. The maximum level of the enzyme was recorded in the variants with application of Flavobacterin (30.7 mg NH3 per 10 g of soil) and Rizobact FZHF (30.2 mg NH3 per 10 g of soil).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil urease activity in triticale was maximal with Rizobact FZHF.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Organ / stage
wax ripeness phasee0
Treatment
Rizobact FZHFe0
Outcome
urease activitye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
30.2 mg NH3 per 10 g of soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in the urease activity was detected in the wax ripeness phase. The maximum level of the enzyme was recorded in the variants with application of Flavobacterin (30.7 mg NH3 per 10 g of soil) and Rizobact FZHF (30.2 mg NH3 per 10 g of soil).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale soil phosphatase values was maximal with Mizorin.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
Mizorine0
Outcome
phosphatase valuese0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.9 mg P2 O5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the same phase, maximum phosphatase values were observed in the variant with application of Mizorin (2.9 mg P2 O5 ), and invertase in the variants with application of Agrophil (15.6 mg glucose) and Rizobact RZHF (16.7 mg glucose).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1386 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale soil invertase was maximal with Agrophil.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
Agrophile0
Outcome
invertasee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
15.6 mg glucosee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the same phase, maximum phosphatase values were observed in the variant with application of Mizorin (2.9 mg P2 O5 ), and invertase in the variants with application of Agrophil (15.6 mg glucose) and Rizobact RZHF (16.7 mg glucose).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1386 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale soil invertase was maximal with Rizobact RZHF.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
Rizobact RZHFe0
Outcome
invertasee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
16.7 mg glucosee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the same phase, maximum phosphatase values were observed in the variant with application of Mizorin (2.9 mg P2 O5 ), and invertase in the variants with application of Agrophil (15.6 mg glucose) and Rizobact RZHF (16.7 mg glucose).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1386 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale soil catalase was highest at earing with Agrophil.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Organ / stage
earing phasee0
Treatment
Agrophile0
Outcome
catalasee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest concentration of catalase was observed at the earing phase when Agrophil and Flavobacterin were used (respectively 3.8 and 3.4 ml of O2 released in 2 min per 1 g of soil).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1570 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale soil catalase was highest at earing with Flavobacterin.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Organ / stage
earing phasee0
Treatment
Flavobacterine0
Outcome
catalasee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.4 ml of O2 released in 2 min per 1 g of soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest concentration of catalase was observed at the earing phase when Agrophil and Flavobacterin were used (respectively 3.8 and 3.4 ml of O2 released in 2 min per 1 g of soil).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1570 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flavobacterin inoculation increased triticale plant height by 5.63% relative to control.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
inoculation with Flavobacterin preparatione0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5.63%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High rates of plant height and ear productivity were obtained in the variant with inoculation with Flavobacterin preparation. The increase relative to the control in this case amounted to: by plant height – 5.63%, by ear length – 5.3%, by number of grains – 16.7%, by grain weight per ear – 41.4%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1868 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flavobacterin inoculation increased triticale ear length by 5.3% relative to control.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
inoculation with Flavobacterin preparatione0
Outcome
ear lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5.3%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High rates of plant height and ear productivity were obtained in the variant with inoculation with Flavobacterin preparation. The increase relative to the control in this case amounted to: by plant height – 5.63%, by ear length – 5.3%, by number of grains – 16.7%, by grain weight per ear – 41.4%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1868 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flavobacterin inoculation increased triticale number of grains by 16.7% relative to control.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
inoculation with Flavobacterin preparatione0
Outcome
number of grainse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
16.7%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High rates of plant height and ear productivity were obtained in the variant with inoculation with Flavobacterin preparation. The increase relative to the control in this case amounted to: by plant height – 5.63%, by ear length – 5.3%, by number of grains – 16.7%, by grain weight per ear – 41.4%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1868 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flavobacterin inoculation increased triticale grain weight per ear by 41.4% relative to control.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
inoculation with Flavobacterin preparatione0
Outcome
grain weight per eare0
Direction
increasee0
Value
41.4%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High rates of plant height and ear productivity were obtained in the variant with inoculation with Flavobacterin preparation. The increase relative to the control in this case amounted to: by plant height – 5.63%, by ear length – 5.3%, by number of grains – 16.7%, by grain weight per ear – 41.4%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1868 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

inoculation · growth · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.