Paper · 2024 · Ecology Environment and Conservation

Seasonal incidence and effect of abiotic factors on population dynamics of anar butterfly (Virachola isocrates) on pomegranate

Senjaliya Tushar M.; J.R. Patel; Hiral G. Patel; et al.

11
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Experiment was carried out on effect of abiotic factors on population dynamics of anar butterfly (V.isocrates) at Horticultural Instructional Farm, S. D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar during 2020-21.The results revealed that incidence of anar butterfly (V.isocrates) was commenced from 2 nd week of July (28 th SMW) to 1 st week of August (32 nd SMW).The higher activity of anar butterfly was observed during the 3 rd week of September (38 th SMW) at peak activity period of the pest in Mrig bahar.Thereafter the larva of anar butterfly was decreased at 5.63 to 1.83 per cent.In the 3 rd week of July (29 th SMW) fruit damage per cent was 2.10 and reached up to 36.39 in the 3 rd week of September (38 th SMW).The corrected fruit damage per cent was found to be negatively non-significant during experiment, whereas bright sunshine (r = 0.181) and morning relative humidity (r = 0.047) was a positive non-significant.Two weather parameters wind speed (r = -0.719**)and maximum temperature (r = -0.566*)had highly significant negative and significant negative association with fruit damage caused by V. isocrates.Minimum temperature, evening relative humidity and rainy days showed negative non-significant correlation with fruit damage (r= -0.327, r= -0.041 and r= -0.121) respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anar butterfly incidence began between late July and early August.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Interactor
V.isocratesDeudorix isocratese0pest
Outcome
incidence of anar butterfly (V.isocrates)e0
Qualifier
2 nd week of July (28 th SMW) to 1 st week of August (32 nd SMW)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Deudorix isocrates
Deudorix isocrates · InteractorBalakrishnan Valappil · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“incidence of anar butterfly (V.isocrates) was commenced from 2 nd week of July (28 th SMW) to 1 st week of August (32 nd SMW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–363 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anar butterfly activity peaked in the third week of September.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Interactor
anar butterflye0pest
Outcome
activity of anar butterflye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
3 rd week of September (38 th SMW)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The higher activity of anar butterfly was observed during the 3 rd week of September (38 th SMW) at peak activity period of the pest in Mrig bahar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–510 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anar butterfly larvae decreased from 5.63 to 1.83 percent.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Interactor
anar butterflye0pest
Outcome
larva of anar butterflye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
5.63 to 1.83 per cente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“the larva of anar butterfly was decreased at 5.63 to 1.83 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–588 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit damage rose from 2.10 in July to 36.39 percent in September.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Outcome
fruit damage per cente0
Direction
reached up toe0
Value
36.39e0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“fruit damage per cent was 2.10 and reached up to 36.39 in the 3 rd week of September (38 th SMW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–722 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wind speed was negatively associated with fruit damage (r = -0.719).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Interactor
V. isocratesDeudorix isocratese0pest
Outcome
fruit damage caused by V. isocratese0
Direction
negativee0
Value
r = -0.719**e0
Qualifier
wind speede0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Deudorix isocrates
Deudorix isocrates · InteractorBalakrishnan Valappil · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“wind speed (r = -0.719**)and maximum temperature (r = -0.566*)had highly significant negative and significant negative association with fruit damage caused by V. isocrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1124 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum temperature was negatively associated with fruit damage (r = -0.566).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Interactor
V. isocratesDeudorix isocratese0pest
Outcome
fruit damage caused by V. isocratese0
Direction
negativee0
Value
r = -0.566*e0
Qualifier
maximum temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Deudorix isocrates
Deudorix isocrates · InteractorBalakrishnan Valappil · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“wind speed (r = -0.719**)and maximum temperature (r = -0.566*)had highly significant negative and significant negative association with fruit damage caused by V. isocrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1124 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bright sunshine had a positive nonsignificant association with fruit damage.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Outcome
bright sunshinee0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r = 0.181e0
Qualifier
bright sunshinee0
Setting
pomegranatet0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“bright sunshine (r = 0.181) and morning relative humidity (r = 0.047) was a positive non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–929 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Morning relative humidity had a positive nonsignificant association with fruit damage.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Interactor
anar butterflye1pest
Outcome
morning relative humiditye0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r = 0.047e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“bright sunshine (r = 0.181) and morning relative humidity (r = 0.047) was a positive non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–929 · show in text ↑
e1

“incidence of anar butterfly (V.isocrates) was commenced from 2 nd week of July (28 th SMW) to 1 st week of August (32 nd SMW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–363 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum temperature had a negative nonsignificant correlation with fruit damage.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Interactor
anar butterflye1pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
negativee0
Value
r= -0.327e0
Qualifier
Minimum temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Minimum temperature, evening relative humidity and rainy days showed negative non-significant correlation with fruit damage (r= -0.327, r= -0.041 and r= -0.121) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1298 · show in text ↑
e1

“incidence of anar butterfly (V.isocrates) was commenced from 2 nd week of July (28 th SMW) to 1 st week of August (32 nd SMW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–363 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Evening relative humidity had a negative nonsignificant correlation with fruit damage.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Interactor
anar butterflye1pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
negativee0
Value
r= -0.041e0
Qualifier
evening relative humiditye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Minimum temperature, evening relative humidity and rainy days showed negative non-significant correlation with fruit damage (r= -0.327, r= -0.041 and r= -0.121) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1298 · show in text ↑
e1

“incidence of anar butterfly (V.isocrates) was commenced from 2 nd week of July (28 th SMW) to 1 st week of August (32 nd SMW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–363 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainy days had a negative nonsignificant correlation with fruit damage.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Interactor
anar butterflye1pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
negativee0
Value
r= -0.121e0
Qualifier
rainy dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Minimum temperature, evening relative humidity and rainy days showed negative non-significant correlation with fruit damage (r= -0.327, r= -0.041 and r= -0.121) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1298 · show in text ↑
e1

“incidence of anar butterfly (V.isocrates) was commenced from 2 nd week of July (28 th SMW) to 1 st week of August (32 nd SMW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–363 · show in text ↑