Paper · 2023 · Russian Agricultural Sciences

Agroeconomic Assessment of Technological Methods for Barley Grain Production under the Conditions of the Central Chernozem Region of Russia

I. I. Gureev; A. V. Gostev; L. B. Nitchenko; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The study was performed to assess the effect of the main tillage methods and rates of mineral fertilizers on the yield, quality, and economic efficiency of barley grain production under the conditions of the Central Chernozem Region. The work was performed in 2014–2022 in crops of barley in a grain-grass row crop rotation located on a watershed plateau. The soil of the plot was typical medium loamy chernozem. We studied the variants with different rates of fertilizers: without fertilizers, N30Р30K30, and N60Р60K60 and with various methods of basic tillage: plowing to a depth of 20–22 cm, disking to 8–10 cm, and nonmoldboard loosening to 20–22 cm. The experimental data were processed according to the method of optimal planning of a multifactorial experiment. The yield of barley grain increased over the entire range of increased rate of fertilizers. The yield was the greatest (3.32–3.63 t/ha) on the background of plowing. The protein content and grain unit slightly depended on the rate of fertilizers. The mean for the fertilization variants amount of protein was maximal (13.1%) in the variant with soil disking and minimal nonmoldboard loosening (12.7%). The grain unit (631–637 g/L) corresponded to the first class according to GOST 28672-2019. Nonmoldboard loosening is preferable for obtaining better grain unit. The weight of 1000 grains increased parallel to the fertilizer rates. It was maximal (46.9–48.4 g) in the variants with nonmoldboard loosening and disking. The lowest prime cost of grain (4650 rubles/t on average) was recorded for disking. It increased from 4390–4820 to 4990–5540 rubles/t with the rise in the yield of barley grain in variants with higher rates of fertilizers, because yield gain did not cover the expenses for the application of higher fertilizer rates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley grain yield increased over the entire range of increased fertilizer rates.

Treatment
increased rate of fertilizerse1
Outcome
yield of barley graine1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
Central Chernozem Regione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley grain production under the conditions of the Central Chernozem Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–241 · show in text ↑
e1

“The yield of barley grain increased over the entire range of increased rate of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–867 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley grain yield was greatest on the background of plowing.

Treatment
plowinge2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
greateste2
Value
3.32–3.63 t/hae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley grain production under the conditions of the Central Chernozem Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–241 · show in text ↑
e2

“The yield was the greatest (3.32–3.63 t/ha) on the background of plowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–941 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content was maximal (13.1%) in the variant with soil disking.

Treatment
soil diskinge3
Outcome
amount of proteine3
Direction
maximale3
Value
13.1%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley grain production under the conditions of the Central Chernozem Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–241 · show in text ↑
e3

“The mean for the fertilization variants amount of protein was maximal (13.1%) in the variant with soil disking and minimal nonmoldboard loosening (12.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1177 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content was minimal (12.7%) in the variant with nonmoldboard loosening.

Treatment
nonmoldboard looseninge3
Outcome
amount of proteine3
Direction
minimale3
Value
12.7%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley grain production under the conditions of the Central Chernozem Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–241 · show in text ↑
e3

“The mean for the fertilization variants amount of protein was maximal (13.1%) in the variant with soil disking and minimal nonmoldboard loosening (12.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1177 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content and grain unit depended only slightly on fertilizer rate in barley.

Treatment
rate of fertilizerse4
Outcome
protein content and grain unite4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley grain production under the conditions of the Central Chernozem Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–241 · show in text ↑
e4

“The protein content and grain unit slightly depended on the rate of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1022 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley grain unit corresponded to the first class according to GOST 28672-2019.

Outcome
grain unite5
Value
631–637 g/Le5
Qualifier
first class according to GOST 28672-2019e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley grain production under the conditions of the Central Chernozem Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–241 · show in text ↑
e5

“The grain unit (631–637 g/L) corresponded to the first class according to GOST 28672-2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1268 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nonmoldboard loosening is preferable for obtaining better barley grain unit.

Treatment
Nonmoldboard looseninge6
Outcome
better grain unite6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley grain production under the conditions of the Central Chernozem Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–241 · show in text ↑
e6

“Nonmoldboard loosening is preferable for obtaining better grain unit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1338 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weight of 1000 barley grains increased with fertilizer rates.

Treatment
fertilizer ratese7
Outcome
weight of 1000 grainse7
Direction
increasede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley grain production under the conditions of the Central Chernozem Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–241 · show in text ↑
e7

“The weight of 1000 grains increased parallel to the fertilizer rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1408 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weight of 1000 barley grains was maximal (46.9–48.4 g) with nonmoldboard loosening and disking.

Treatment
nonmoldboard loosening and diskinge1
Outcome
weight of 1000 grainse7
Direction
maximale1
Value
46.9–48.4 ge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley grain production under the conditions of the Central Chernozem Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–241 · show in text ↑
e7

“The weight of 1000 grains increased parallel to the fertilizer rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1408 · show in text ↑
e1

“It was maximal (46.9–48.4 g) in the variants with nonmoldboard loosening and disking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1494 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prime cost of barley grain was lowest with disking.

Treatment
diskinge1
Outcome
prime cost of graine1
Direction
loweste1
Value
4650 rubles/te1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley grain production under the conditions of the Central Chernozem Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–241 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest prime cost of grain (4650 rubles/t on average) was recorded for disking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1578 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prime cost of barley grain increased from 4390–4820 to 4990–5540 rubles/t in variants with higher fertilizer rates.

Treatment
higher rates of fertilizerse2
Outcome
prime cost of graine1
Direction
increasede2
Value
4390–4820 to 4990–5540 rubles/te2
Qualifier
yield gain did not cover the expenses for the application of higher fertilizer ratese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley grain production under the conditions of the Central Chernozem Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–241 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest prime cost of grain (4650 rubles/t on average) was recorded for disking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1578 · show in text ↑
e2

“It increased from 4390–4820 to 4990–5540 rubles/t with the rise in the yield of barley grain in variants with higher rates of fertilizers, because yield gain did not cover the expenses for the application of higher fertilizer rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1811 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.