Paper · 2015 · Baghdad Science Journal

Variation of Faba Beans (Vicia faba L.) Traits Induced By Heat, Electric Shock and Mutagen Nitrous Acid

Laith M. J. AL-Shamma

10
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This research was carried out to determine the impact of heat shock, electric shock and seeds in soaking nitrous acid mutagen solution on three cultivars of faba beans plant (Zaina, Aguadulce and Local) at the year 2012-2013. Factorial experiment was arranged in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replicates were used. The results showed that heat shock lead to early plants of 50% in flowering and an increase in the number of branches/plant and the number of seeds/pod compared to other treatments, whereas the seeds soaked in nitrous acid mutagen solution gave the highest plant height, leaf area index, number of pods/plant, seed weight, seed yield kg/ha, and did not differ significantly with treatment of electric shock in the protein yield(kg/ha). Zaina cultivar was superior over other cultivars in early to 50% flowering, number of branches/plant, number of pods/plant and seed weight, while gave the lowest value in plant height. Significant differences also observed for the interaction between cultivars and treatments. Zaina cultivar with heat shock treatment gave less number of days to 50% flowering, highest number of branches/plant and the number of seeds/pod, either when seeds soaked in nitrous acid mutagen solution given the highest plant height of plant, highest mean of seed weight, seed yield kg/ha and did not differ significantly with local variety in the number of pods/plant trait .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat shock advanced 50% flowering.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
heat shocke0
Outcome
50% in floweringe0
Direction
earlye0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“heat shock lead to early plants of 50% in flowering and an increase in the number of branches/plant and the number of seeds/pod compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–516 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Beans (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat shock increased branches per plant and seeds per pod.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
heat shocke0
Outcome
number of branches/plant and the number of seeds/pode0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“heat shock lead to early plants of 50% in flowering and an increase in the number of branches/plant and the number of seeds/pod compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrous acid treatment gave the highest height, leaf area index, pods, seed weight and seed yield.

Taxon
plante0
Treatment
seeds soaked in nitrous acid mutagen solutione0
Outcome
plant height, leaf area index, number of pods/plant, seed weight, seed yield kg/hae0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the seeds soaked in nitrous acid mutagen solution gave the highest plant height, leaf area index, number of pods/plant, seed weight, seed yield kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrous acid and electric shock did not differ significantly in protein yield.

Taxon
Faba BeansVicia fabat0
Treatment
nitrous acid mutagen solutione1
Outcome
protein yield(kg/ha)e0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
treatment of electric shocke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did not differ significantly with treatment of electric shock in the protein yield(kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Beans (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–39 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas the seeds soaked in nitrous acid mutagen solution gave”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–580 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zaina led the other cultivars in flowering earliness, branch and pod number, and seed weight.

Taxon
plante0
Material
Zaina cultivare0
Outcome
early to 50% flowering, number of branches/plant, number of pods/plant and seed weighte0
Comparator
other cultivarse0

Verbatim

e0

“Zaina cultivar was superior over other cultivars in early to 50% flowering, number of branches/plant, number of pods/plant and seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–910 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zaina had the lowest plant height.

Taxon
plante0
Material
Zaina cultivare0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
other cultivarse0

Verbatim

e0

“Zaina cultivar was superior over other cultivars in early to 50% flowering, number of branches/plant, number of pods/plant and seed weight, while gave the lowest value in plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–955 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar by treatment interactions differed significantly.

Taxon
Faba BeansVicia fabat0
Outcome
interaction between cultivars and treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences also observed for the interaction between cultivars and treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Beans (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zaina with heat shock had fewer days to 50% flowering and highest branches and seeds per pod.

Taxon
plante0
Material
Zaina cultivare0
Treatment
heat shock treatmente0
Outcome
number of days to 50% floweringe0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Zaina cultivar with heat shock treatment gave less number of days to 50% flowering, highest number of branches/plant and the number of seeds/pod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zaina with nitrous acid had highest height, seed weight and seed yield.

Taxon
plante0
Treatment
seeds soaked in nitrous acid mutagen solutione0
Outcome
plant height of plant, highest mean of seed weight, seed yield kg/hae0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“when seeds soaked in nitrous acid mutagen solution given the highest plant height of plant, highest mean of seed weight, seed yield kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1339 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zaina nitrous acid treatment did not differ from Local for pods per plant.

Taxon
Faba BeansVicia fabat0
Outcome
number of pods/plant traite0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
local varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did not differ significantly with local variety in the number of pods/plant trait”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1425 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Beans (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–39 · show in text ↑

nitrous acid · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

mutagen · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

nitrous acid · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mutagen · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

heat · phenology · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

heat · yield · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 110 positive, 6 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

heat · phenology · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.