Paper · 2024 · Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus

The effects of high temperature and low humidity on crop water stress index of seed pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo L.) in semi-arid climate conditions

Ali Beyhan Ucak; Joanna Kocięcka; Daniel Liberacki; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of high temperature and low humidity on the crop water stress index (CWSI) of seed pumpkin plants grown under semi-arid climate conditions to determine the optimum irrigation time. This research unveils the critical impact of high temperature and low humidity on seed pumpkin growth, emphasizing the vital role of the CWSI in optimizing irrigation strategies and seed yield. Moreover, the relationship between CWSI, physiological parameters, and seed yield of the pumpkin was investigated. The mean CWSI values in the I70 (0.40) and I35 (0.56) treatments were 42% and 100% higher, respectively than those in the full irrigation (I100) treatment (0.28). While the I70 treatment showed manageable water stress with minimal impact, the I35 treatment experienced severe stress, significantly reducing crop growth and yield. The mean seed yield (SY) in the I70 treatment increased to 1245.2 kg ha–1 compared to I35 (903.3 kg ha–1) but remained lower than I100 (1339.3 kg ha–1). The CWSI had negative correlations (p ≤ 0.01) with seed yield, chlorophyll content, and leaf area index, while it had positive correlations with water use efficiency and irrigation water use efficiency (p ≤ 0.01). This study showed that pumpkins could be grown successfully at 30% water deficit conditions, and a water deficit higher than 30% may cause a significant seed yield loss in semi-arid climate conditions. In addition, the results highlight the importance of optimal irrigation and CWSI monitoring for informed irrigation decisions and sustainable agricultural practices. Therefore, moderate water deficit (I70) can be adopted in pumpkin cultivation as an alternative to full irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I70 treatment raised mean CWSI 42% above full irrigation (I100)

Taxon
seed pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)Cucurbita pepot0
Treatment
I70e1
Outcome
mean CWSI valuese1
Direction
highere1
Value
42%e1
Comparator
full irrigation (I100) treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The mean CWSI values in the I70 (0.40) and I35 (0.56) treatments were 42% and 100% higher, respectively than those in the full irrigation (I100) treatment (0.28)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“seed pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I35 treatment raised mean CWSI 100% above full irrigation (I100)

Taxon
seed pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)Cucurbita pepot0
Treatment
I35e1
Outcome
mean CWSI valuese1
Direction
highere1
Value
100%e1
Comparator
full irrigation (I100) treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The mean CWSI values in the I70 (0.40) and I35 (0.56) treatments were 42% and 100% higher, respectively than those in the full irrigation (I100) treatment (0.28)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“seed pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I70 treatment seed yield increased to 1245.2 kg ha–1, compared with I35

Taxon
seed pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)Cucurbita pepot0
Treatment
I70 treatmente2
Outcome
mean seed yield (SY)e2
Direction
increasede2
Value
1245.2 kg ha–1e2
Qualifier
903.3 kg ha–1e2
Comparator
I35e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The mean seed yield (SY) in the I70 treatment increased to 1245.2 kg ha–1 compared to I35 (903.3 kg ha–1) but remained lower than I100 (1339.3 kg ha–1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“seed pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I70 treatment seed yield remained lower than I100

Taxon
seed pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)Cucurbita pepot0
Treatment
I70 treatmente2
Outcome
mean seed yield (SY)e2
Direction
lowere2
Qualifier
1339.3 kg ha–1e2
Comparator
I100e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The mean seed yield (SY) in the I70 treatment increased to 1245.2 kg ha–1 compared to I35 (903.3 kg ha–1) but remained lower than I100 (1339.3 kg ha–1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“seed pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CWSI was negatively correlated with seed yield, chlorophyll content and leaf area index

Taxon
seed pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)Cucurbita pepot0
Treatment
CWSIe3
Outcome
seed yield, chlorophyll content, and leaf area indexe3
Direction
negativee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The CWSI had negative correlations (p ≤ 0.01) with seed yield, chlorophyll content, and leaf area index, while it had positive correlations with water use efficiency and irrigation water use efficiency (p ≤ 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“seed pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CWSI was positively correlated with water use efficiency and irrigation water use efficiency

Taxon
seed pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)Cucurbita pepot0
Treatment
CWSIe3
Outcome
water use efficiency and irrigation water use efficiencye3
Direction
positivee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The CWSI had negative correlations (p ≤ 0.01) with seed yield, chlorophyll content, and leaf area index, while it had positive correlations with water use efficiency and irrigation water use efficiency (p ≤ 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“seed pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pumpkins could be grown successfully at 30% water deficit

Taxon
pumpkinsCucurbitae4
Treatment
30% water deficite4
Outcome
grown successfullye4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita
Cucurbita · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAffitisciuto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“This study showed that pumpkins could be grown successfully at 30% water deficit conditions, and a water deficit higher than 30% may cause a significant seed yield loss in semi-arid climate conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1428 · show in text ↑
t0

“seed pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effecthypothesisoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A water deficit higher than 30% may cause a significant seed yield loss in semi-arid climate conditions

Taxon
pumpkinsCucurbitae4
Treatment
a water deficit higher than 30%e4
Outcome
seed yield losse4
Direction
decreaseinferrede4
Setting
semi-arid climate conditionse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita
Cucurbita · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAffitisciuto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“This study showed that pumpkins could be grown successfully at 30% water deficit conditions, and a water deficit higher than 30% may cause a significant seed yield loss in semi-arid climate conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1428 · show in text ↑
t0

“seed pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I70 treatment showed manageable water stress with minimal impact

Taxon
seed pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)Cucurbita pepot0
Treatment
I70 treatmente5
Outcome
water stresse5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“While the I70 treatment showed manageable water stress with minimal impact, the I35 treatment experienced severe stress, significantly reducing crop growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“seed pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

I35 treatment significantly reduced crop growth and yield

Taxon
seed pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)Cucurbita pepot0
Treatment
I35 treatmente5
Outcome
crop growth and yielde5
Direction
reducinge5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“While the I70 treatment showed manageable water stress with minimal impact, the I35 treatment experienced severe stress, significantly reducing crop growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“seed pumpkin plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–118 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water deficit (I70) can be adopted in pumpkin cultivation as an alternative to full irrigation

Taxon
pumpkine6
Treatment
moderate water deficit (I70)e6
Outcome
alternative to full irrigatione6

Verbatim

e6

“Therefore, moderate water deficit (I70) can be adopted in pumpkin cultivation as an alternative to full irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1710 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results differ

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.