Paper · 2024 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of lime, blended fertilizer and vermicompost on maize (Zea mays) yield in Assosa district, north-western Ethiopia

ABDISA ABEBE; MARKKU YLI-HALLA; LEMMA WOGI; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Application of organic and mineral fertilizers improves crop productivity and availability of plant nutrients. Further investigation into their integral application is crucial to obtaining optimum crop productivity. A field experiment was conducted during 2020–21 and 2021–22 at experimental field station in Benshangul Gumuz, Assosa University, Assosa, Ethiopia to investigate the response of maize (Zea mays L.) yield to lime, blended NPSZnB fertilizer and vermicompost. Two lime levels, three vermicompost levels, and three blended fertilizer levels were factorially combined and laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD). The integral application of organic fertilizer with blended fertilizer with lime significantly affected the agronomic parameters. Grain yield, number of grains per cob, 1000-seed weights, plant height, and days to 50% tasseling were parameters most affected by the amendments. Integral application of 50% of the recommended rate of blended fertilizer and vermicompost with lime improved maize yield by 53%, while the application of NPSZnB and vermicompost individually improved maize yield by 34% and 22% over the control treatment. One tonne of vermicompost and lime could substitute 38 kg and 23 kg of blended fertilizer, respectively. In conclusion, the integrated application of NPSZnB and vermicompost with the recommended amount of lime was the best soil fertility management option. In terms of grain yield and net benefit, 4 t/ha lime, 2.5 t/ha vermicompost and 100 kg/ha blended fertilizers were recommended for optimum maize production in the Assosa area and similar agroecologies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined organic fertilizer, blended fertilizer and lime significantly affected agronomic parameters.

Treatment
integral application of organic fertilizer with blended fertilizer with limee0
Outcome
agronomic parameterse0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The integral application of organic fertilizer with blended fertilizer with lime significantly affected the agronomic parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half the recommended blended fertilizer and vermicompost rate with lime increased maize yield by 53%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
50% of the recommended rate of blended fertilizer and vermicompost with limee0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
53%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integral application of 50% of the recommended rate of blended fertilizer and vermicompost with lime improved maize yield by 53%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPSZnB alone increased maize yield by 34% over control.

Treatment
NPSZnBe0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
34%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the application of NPSZnB and vermicompost individually improved maize yield by 34% and 22% over the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost alone increased maize yield by 22% over control.

Treatment
vermicomposte0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the application of NPSZnB and vermicompost individually improved maize yield by 34% and 22% over the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1169 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One tonne of vermicompost could substitute for 38 kg blended fertilizer.

Treatment
vermicomposte0
Outcome
substitutee0
Value
38 kge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“One tonne of vermicompost and lime could substitute 38 kg and 23 kg of blended fertilizer, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1274 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One tonne of lime could substitute for 23 kg blended fertilizer.

Treatment
limee0
Outcome
substitutee0
Value
23 kge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“One tonne of vermicompost and lime could substitute 38 kg and 23 kg of blended fertilizer, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1274 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended 4 t/ha lime, 2.5 t/ha vermicompost and 100 kg/ha blended fertilizer for maize production.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
4 t/ha lime, 2.5 t/ha vermicompost and 100 kg/ha blended fertilizerse0
Setting
Assosa areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“4 t/ha lime, 2.5 t/ha vermicompost and 100 kg/ha blended fertilizers were recommended for optimum maize production in the Assosa area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1602 · show in text ↑

lime · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 185 positive, 34 negative or no effect

184 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

215 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.