Paper · 2024 · Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology

Biochemical Changes: Their Potential Role against Fungal Disease Resistance Development in Mustard

Aditi Shrivastav; Manoj Kumar Tripathi; Prakash N. Tiwari; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Rape-seed mustard is an imperative edible oilseed crop which is adversely affected by different biotic stresses causing import of edible oils from abroad. The experiment was carried out for screening mustard genotypes based on disease indexing and putative role of diverse biochemical parameters in development of resistant against three major fungal diseases. A modified 0-9 scale was used for rating of disease indicators to calculate disease incident (DI). In disease indexing, mustard genotypes L-4, GSC-7 and PC-6 were considered as immune against Alternaria brassicae, Maya, L-4, China, GSL-1, GSC-7, PC-5, PC-6 and RP-9 were classified as immune against Albugo candida while L-4 and PC-5 were found immune against Erysiphe cruciferarum. The study of biochemical constituents demonstrated that these immune genotypes accumulated higher osmolytes content including free proline content and total phenol under diseased condition showing their tolerance ability against these pathogens. The tolerant genotypes also had lesser lipid peroxidation rate as indicated by malondialdehyde content analysis to induce lesser effect on total chlorophyll, amino acids, proteins and soluble sugars including reducing and non-reducing sugars. These identified genotypes have wider scope for further phyto-pathological studies and utilization in development of fungal resistance breeding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L-4, GSC-7 and PC-6 were immune to Alternaria brassicae.

Taxon
mustarde0
Material
L-4, GSC-7 and PC-6e0
Interactor
Alternaria brassicaeAlternaria brassicaee0pathogen
Outcome
immune against Alternaria brassicaee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alternaria brassicae
Alternaria brassicae · InteractorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mustard genotypes L-4, GSC-7 and PC-6 were considered as immune against Alternaria brassicae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–573 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maya, L-4, China, GSL-1, GSC-7, PC-5, PC-6 and RP-9 were immune to Albugo candida.

Taxon
Mustardt0
Material
Maya, L-4, China, GSL-1, GSC-7, PC-5, PC-6 and RP-9e0
Interactor
Albugo candidaAlbugo candidae0pathogen
Outcome
immune against Albugo candidae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Albugo candida
Albugo candida · InteractorPlant pests and diseases · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maya, L-4, China, GSL-1, GSC-7, PC-5, PC-6 and RP-9 were classified as immune against Albugo candida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L-4 and PC-5 were immune to Erysiphe cruciferarum.

Taxon
Mustardt0
Material
L-4 and PC-5e0
Interactor
Erysiphe cruciferarumErysiphe cruciferarume0pathogen
Outcome
immune against Erysiphe cruciferarume0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Erysiphe cruciferarum
Erysiphe cruciferarum · InteractorJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“L-4 and PC-5 were found immune against Erysiphe cruciferarum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Immune mustard genotypes accumulated higher free proline under disease.

Taxon
mustardt0
Material
immune genotypese0
Outcome
free proline contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under diseased conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“these immune genotypes accumulated higher osmolytes content including free proline content and total phenol under diseased condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Immune mustard genotypes accumulated higher total phenol under disease.

Taxon
mustardt0
Material
immune genotypese0
Outcome
total phenole0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under diseased conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“these immune genotypes accumulated higher osmolytes content including free proline content and total phenol under diseased condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant mustard genotypes had less lipid peroxidation.

Taxon
mustardt0
Material
tolerant genotypese0
Outcome
lipid peroxidation ratee0
Direction
lessere0

Verbatim

e0

“The tolerant genotypes also had lesser lipid peroxidation rate as indicated by malondialdehyde content analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant mustard genotypes showed smaller effects on chlorophyll, amino acids and proteins.

Taxon
mustardt0
Outcome
total chlorophyll, amino acids, proteinse0
Direction
lesser effecte0

Not reportedMaterialQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“to induce lesser effect on total chlorophyll, amino acids, proteins and soluble sugars including reducing and non-reducing sugars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1231 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant mustard genotypes showed smaller effects on reducing and non-reducing sugars.

Taxon
mustardt0
Outcome
soluble sugars including reducing and non-reducing sugarse0
Direction
lesser effecte0
Qualifier
total chlorophylle0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Verbatim

e0

“to induce lesser effect on total chlorophyll, amino acids, proteins and soluble sugars including reducing and non-reducing sugars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1231 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The identified genotypes were proposed for fungal resistance breeding.

Taxon
Mustardt0
Outcome
utilization in development of fungal resistance breedinge0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“These identified genotypes have wider scope for further phyto-pathological studies and utilization in development of fungal resistance breeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑