Paper · 2024 · Plant Disease

First Record of Diplodia gallae Causing Branch Cankers on Declining Scarlet Oak (Quercus coccinea) in Virginia

Devin Bily; Tashi Gyatso; Matt Wolanski; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Members of Botryosphaeria s.l. have an extensive history as cankering pathogens of stressed and declining oak trees in the eastern United States (Ferreira et al. 2021). The host range, distribution, and virulence among two closely related species, Diplodia corticola and D. gallae, remains unclear (Brazee et al. 2023). On 15 August 2023, a survey was conducted at a declining natural hardwood site in Shenandoah County, Virginia (GPS coordinates 38.922089, -78.606125). One mature Quercus coccinea tree that displayed scorched leaf margins and branch dieback was felled and a cankered branch from the crown was sampled (Fig. 1A and B). A 4-mm piece of necrotic tissue was selected from the margin of the canker, disinfected with 2.5% NaOCl, again with 70% ethanol, and air-dried before being placed on half-strength acidified PDA medium (pH 4.8) and incubated in the dark at 22 ± 2°C. After 5 days, four colonies were transferred to full-strength PDA medium and incubated in the dark at 22 ± 2°C. After 10 days, all four colonies displayed thick, gray, floccose mycelium and pigmented hyphae (Fig. 1C). Mycelia was harvested from 10-day-old colonies with a sterile pin and DNA was extracted using a Qiagen DNeasy Plant Pro Kit (Germantown, MD) according to the manufacturer's instructions. A fragment of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and translation elongation factor 1-α (tef1) loci were amplified using ITS4/ITS5 (White et al. 1990) and EF1-728F/EF1-986R (Carbone and Kohn 1999) primer sets, respectively. The PCR amplicons were purified with ExoSap-IT (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) and sequenced at Eurofins (Louisville, KY).&xa0; The raw nucleotide sequences were analyzed using Geneious 11.1.5 software (Biomatters, Auckland, NZ). All four colonies had identical ITS sequences. A 523 and 276-bp fragment of the ITS and tef1 loci, respectively, from isolate R1.2 was deposited into the GenBank database (accessions OR934498 and OR961039). A dataset of 43 strains consisting of 38,658 characters was aligned using MAFFT v7.49 (Katoh et al. 2013), and a concatenated ITS + tef1 maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree (1000 bootstraps) was built with PhyML 3.0 (Guindon et al. 2010) using the GTR substitution model. Isolate R1.2 was grouped with isolates of D. gallae although the species failed to form a well-supported clade (BS = 67) due to intraspecific variation (Fig. 1D). Koch's postulates were fulfilled by inoculating five healthy, containerized Q. coccinea trees (average stem caliper 5.3 cm) with isolate R1.2, with five plants as controls. After disinfecting the bark with 70% ethanol, a 0.5 mm section of the bark was removed 13 cm above the soil line with a sterile scalpel, and a 0.5 mm agar plug taken from the edge of a 10-day-old PDA culture was placed in the wound with the mycelium facing the cambial tissue, sealed with Parafilm, and maintained at 22 ± 4°C. The same procedure was performed on the control plants using sterile PDA plugs. After five weeks the bark was removed, and all five stems treated with R1.2 had necrotic lesions with a mean linear growth ([length+width]/2) of 9.2 ± 2.72 mm from the edge of the wound, which was significantly larger (P = 0.003) than the controls (1 ± 0.66 mm; Fig. 1E - L). Necrotic stem tissue was sampled as previously described, and the isolate recovered was confirmed as D. gallae based on morphology and 100% ITS sequence homology to isolate R1.2. D. gallae was not recovered from the control plants. In the United States, D. gallae has been isolated from Q. rubra and Q. velutina twig cankers in Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, and Vermont (Brazee et al. 2023). This is the first report of the species in Virginia causing branch cankers on Q. coccinea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oak isolate clustered with D. gallae, although the clade lacked strong support.

Taxon
Quercus coccineaQuercus coccineat0
Interactor
D. gallaeDiplodia gallaee0pathogen
Outcome
grouped with isolates of D. gallaee0
Qualifier
BS = 67e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus coccinea
Quercus coccinea · TaxonJay Sturner from USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isolate R1.2 was grouped with isolates of D. gallae although the species failed to form a well-supported clade (BS = 67) due to intraspecific variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2225–2376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quercus coccinea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All five inoculated oak stems developed necrotic lesions.

Taxon
Quercus coccineaQuercus coccineat0
Treatment
R1.2e0
Interactor
D. gallaeDiplodia gallaee1pathogen
Outcome
necrotic lesionse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus coccinea
Quercus coccinea · TaxonJay Sturner from USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all five stems treated with R1.2 had necrotic lesions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3011–3064 · show in text ↑
e1

“the isolate recovered was confirmed as D. gallae based on morphology and 100% ITS sequence homology to isolate R1.2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3306–3421 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quercus coccinea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated oak stems had significantly larger lesions than controls.

Taxon
Quercus coccineaQuercus coccineat0
Treatment
R1.2e1
Interactor
D. gallaeDiplodia gallaee1pathogen
Outcome
mean linear growthe0
Direction
largere0
Value
9.2 ± 2.72 mme0
Qualifier
1 ± 0.66 mme0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus coccinea
Quercus coccinea · TaxonJay Sturner from USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mean linear growth ([length+width]/2) of 9.2 ± 2.72 mm from the edge of the wound, which was significantly larger (P = 0.003) than the controls (1 ± 0.66 mm; Fig. 1E - L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3072–3242 · show in text ↑
e1

“the isolate recovered was confirmed as D. gallae based on morphology and 100% ITS sequence homology to isolate R1.2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3306–3421 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quercus coccinea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pathogen was recovered from inoculated oak tissue and confirmed as D. gallae.

Taxon
Quercus coccineaQuercus coccineat0
Interactor
D. gallaeDiplodia gallaee0pathogen
Outcome
isolate recovered was confirmed as D. gallaee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus coccinea
Quercus coccinea · TaxonJay Sturner from USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the isolate recovered was confirmed as D. gallae based on morphology and 100% ITS sequence homology to isolate R1.2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3306–3421 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quercus coccinea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. gallae was not recovered from control oak plants.

Taxon
Quercus coccineaQuercus coccineat0
Interactor
D. gallaeDiplodia gallaee0pathogen
Outcome
D. gallae was not recoverede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus coccinea
Quercus coccinea · TaxonJay Sturner from USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“D. gallae was not recovered from the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3423–3474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quercus coccinea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

This is the first report of D. gallae causing branch cankers on Q. coccinea in Virginia.

Taxon
Q. coccineaQuercus coccineae0
Interactor
D. gallaeDiplodia gallaee1pathogen
Outcome
causing branch cankerse0
Setting
Virginiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus coccinea
Quercus coccinea · TaxonJay Sturner from USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This is the first report of the species in Virginia causing branch cankers on Q. coccinea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3653–3742 · show in text ↑
e1

“the isolate recovered was confirmed as D. gallae based on morphology and 100% ITS sequence homology to isolate R1.2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3306–3421 · show in text ↑