Paper · 2024 · South African Journal of Botany

Physiological responses, ion accumulation and yield performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to salt stress

Atikur Rahman; Sujat Ahmed; Moshiul Islam; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Wheat is affected by various biotic and abiotic stresses, especially salinity, which reduces the growth and yield drastically. High salinity is a major constraint for wheat productivity in many countries, including Bangladesh. With this view, here, an experiment was conducted to observe genotypic differences in physiological, ion accumulation, agro-morphological and yield performance of wheat against different levels of salinity. Experimental variables consisted of five salt tolerant genotypes (G 20–2–2, G 20–1–2, G 13–2, G 22–2, G 9–2), one susceptible genotype (G 24–2) and one standard check variety (BARI ghom 25), which assigned to four levels of salinity with electrical conductivities control (0.3), 4, 8 and 12 dS m −1 . Irrespective of genotypes, salinity stress significantly decreased the yield and yield attributes. Results of analyses based on salt tolerance indices of plant growth related and yield contributing parameters, ionic balance (Na + , K + and Na + / K + ratio), and stress indicators such as chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration rate (Tr) revealed genotypes G 20–2–2, G 13–2 and G 20–1–2 as salt tolerant, genotype G 9–2 as moderately salt-tolerant and G 24–2 and G 22–2 as salt-sensitive genotypes. Additionally, lower accumulations of hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde, and higher activities of antioxidant enzymes in the salt-tolerant genotypes G 20–2–2 and G 13–2 than in the salt-sensitive genotype G 24–2 indicated reduced oxidative damage in genotypes G 20–2–2 and G 13–2 relative to that in genotype G 24–2. Collectively, our findings suggest that the optimum growth and yield of salt tolerant genotypes are associated with decreased Na + / K + ratio, increased antioxidant enzymes activity and reduced oxidative stress .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly decreased wheat yield and yield attributes.

Treatment
salinity stresse0e1
Outcome
yield and yield attributese0e1
Direction
decreasede0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrespective of genotypes, salinity stress significantly decreased the yield and yield attributes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–833 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of wheat against different levels of salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–432 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G 20–2–2, G 13–2 and G 20–1–2 were classified salt tolerant.

Material
G 20–2–2, G 13–2 and G 20–1–2e0e1
Outcome
salt tolerante0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“revealed genotypes G 20–2–2, G 13–2 and G 20–1–2 as salt tolerant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1190 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of wheat against different levels of salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–432 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G 9–2 was moderately salt tolerant.

Material
G 9–2e0e1
Outcome
moderately salt-tolerante0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotype G 9–2 as moderately salt-tolerant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1234 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of wheat against different levels of salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–432 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G 24–2 and G 22–2 were salt sensitive.

Material
G 24–2 and G 22–2e0e1
Outcome
salt-sensitivee0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G 24–2 and G 22–2 as salt-sensitive genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1284 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of wheat against different levels of salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–432 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant G 20–2–2 and G 13–2 accumulated less hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde than sensitive G 24–2.

Material
G 20–2–2 and G 13–2e0e1
Outcome
hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehydee0e1
Direction
lowere0e1
Comparator
G 24–2e0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower accumulations of hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde, and higher activities of antioxidant enzymes in the salt-tolerant genotypes G 20–2–2 and G 13–2 than in the salt-sensitive genotype G 24–2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1500 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of wheat against different levels of salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–432 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant G 20–2–2 and G 13–2 had higher antioxidant enzyme activity than G 24–2.

Material
G 20–2–2 and G 13–2e0e1
Outcome
activities of antioxidant enzymese0e1
Direction
highere0e1
Comparator
G 24–2e0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower accumulations of hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde, and higher activities of antioxidant enzymes in the salt-tolerant genotypes G 20–2–2 and G 13–2 than in the salt-sensitive genotype G 24–2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1500 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of wheat against different levels of salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–432 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt-tolerant wheat growth and yield were associated with decreased sodium-potassium ratio, increased antioxidant activity, and reduced oxidative stress.

Material
salt tolerant genotypese0e1
Outcome
optimum growth and yielde0e1
Qualifier
decreased Na + / K + ratio, increased antioxidant enzymes activity and reduced oxidative stresse0e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimum growth and yield of salt tolerant genotypes are associated with decreased Na + / K + ratio, increased antioxidant enzymes activity and reduced oxidative stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1817 · show in text ↑
e1

“performance of wheat against different levels of salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–432 · show in text ↑

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.