Paper · 2024 · Plant Science Today

Nutrient management through organic amendments to ensure sustainable and economic cultivation of radish

Shekhar Suman; Shailesh Kumar Singh; Dashrath Bhati

10
claims
27
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Radish cultivation heavily relies on fertilizers, adversely affecting soil health. Shifting to organic practices is crucial for sustainability. This study explores combinations of organic amendments (farmyard manure, vermicompost, and poultry manure) to enhance radish growth and yield economically. Ten treatments were tested using a Randomized Block Design. One-way ANOVA, correlation, and regression analyses were conducted. The combination of 50% vermicompost and 50% poultry manure yielded the best results in plant height, leaf growth, fresh and dry weights, and root size. The highest yield (280 q/ha) was achieved with this combination, followed closely by 75% vermicompost and 25% poultry manure (245 q/ha), and 50% farmyard manure with 50% poultry manure (228 q/ha). This combination also proved the most economically and environmentally sustainable, with a benefit-cost ratio of 2.48. Compared to the control, it delivered a gross return 2.44 times higher and a net return 2.85 times higher. Incorporating poultry manure and vermicompost as nutrient sources in radish cultivation is a scientifically sound and economically viable approach, contributing to sustainable agriculture and aligning with UN Sustainable Development Goals.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% vermicompost plus 50% poultry manure combination gave the best plant height and leaf growth in radish.

Treatment
50% vermicompost and 50% poultry manuree1
Outcome
plant height, leaf growthe1
Direction
beste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cultivation of radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination of 50% vermicompost and 50% poultry manure yielded the best results in plant height, leaf growth, fresh and dry weights, and root size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% vermicompost plus 50% poultry manure combination gave the best fresh and dry weights in radish.

Treatment
50% vermicompost and 50% poultry manuree1
Outcome
fresh and dry weightse1
Direction
beste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cultivation of radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination of 50% vermicompost and 50% poultry manure yielded the best results in plant height, leaf growth, fresh and dry weights, and root size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% vermicompost plus 50% poultry manure combination gave the best root size in radish.

Treatment
50% vermicompost and 50% poultry manuree1
Outcome
root sizee1
Direction
beste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cultivation of radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination of 50% vermicompost and 50% poultry manure yielded the best results in plant height, leaf growth, fresh and dry weights, and root size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% vermicompost plus 50% poultry manure combination gave the highest yield, 280 q/ha.

Treatment
50% vermicompost and 50% poultry manuree1
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
280 q/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cultivation of radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination of 50% vermicompost and 50% poultry manure yielded the best results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–511 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yield (280 q/ha) was achieved with this combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% vermicompost plus 25% poultry manure combination gave a yield of 245 q/ha, following closely the highest combination.

Treatment
75% vermicompost and 25% poultry manuree3
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
followed closely bye3
Value
245 q/hae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cultivation of radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yield (280 q/ha) was achieved with this combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–643 · show in text ↑
e3

“followed closely by 75% vermicompost and 25% poultry manure (245 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–715 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% farmyard manure plus 50% poultry manure combination gave a yield of 228 q/ha, following closely the highest combination.

Treatment
50% farmyard manure with 50% poultry manuree4
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
followed closely bye3
Value
228 q/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cultivation of radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yield (280 q/ha) was achieved with this combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–643 · show in text ↑
e3

“followed closely by 75% vermicompost and 25% poultry manure (245 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–715 · show in text ↑
e4

“50% farmyard manure with 50% poultry manure (228 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% vermicompost plus 50% poultry manure combination had the highest benefit-cost ratio, 2.48.

Treatment
50% vermicompost and 50% poultry manuree1
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe5
Direction
moste5
Value
2.48e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cultivation of radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination of 50% vermicompost and 50% poultry manure yielded the best results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–511 · show in text ↑
e5

“This combination also proved the most economically and environmentally sustainable, with a benefit-cost ratio of 2.48”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with the control, the 50% vermicompost plus 50% poultry manure combination gave a gross return 2.44 times higher.

Treatment
50% vermicompost and 50% poultry manuree1
Outcome
gross returne6
Direction
highere6
Value
2.44 timese6
Comparator
controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cultivation of radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination of 50% vermicompost and 50% poultry manure yielded the best results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–511 · show in text ↑
e6

“Compared to the control, it delivered a gross return 2.44 times higher and a net return 2.85 times higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with the control, the 50% vermicompost plus 50% poultry manure combination gave a net return 2.85 times higher.

Treatment
50% vermicompost and 50% poultry manuree1
Outcome
net returne6
Direction
highere6
Value
2.85 timese6
Comparator
controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cultivation of radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination of 50% vermicompost and 50% poultry manure yielded the best results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–511 · show in text ↑
e6

“Compared to the control, it delivered a gross return 2.44 times higher and a net return 2.85 times higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1001 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend poultry manure and vermicompost as nutrient sources in radish cultivation as a scientifically sound and economically viable approach.

Outcome
scientifically sound and economically viable approache7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cultivation of radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 · show in text ↑
e7

“Incorporating poultry manure and vermicompost as nutrient sources in radish cultivation is a scientifically sound and economically viable approach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1149 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results differ

112 papers: 107 positive, 5 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

108 papers more in this group

See all 112 papers →

fertilization · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 90 positive, 21 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.