Paper · 1984 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Spent Mushroom Compost as a Soil Amendment for Vegetables

Sherry Hsiao-lei Wang; Virginia I. Lohr; David L. Coffey

14
claims
17
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Spent mushroom compost (SMC) was used as a soil amendment for field-grown vegetables. Four rates (0, 2, 10, or 20 kg/m 2 ) of SMC were applied to a fine sandy loam in 1981 and 1982. SMC application decreased bulk density and increased the percentage of small pore space, pH, and electrical conductivity. Yields of cucumber and snap bean increased and yield of onion decreased, as the rate of SMC increased in 1981. Yields of cabbage, radish, and tomato were not affected significantly by the addition of SMC. Tomato yield was maximum at 10 kg/m 2 , then declined as SMC was increased to 20 kg/m 2 in 1982. Yield responses of cucumber, fall-planted radish, spinach, and mustard were similar to that of tomato. Salt sensitive crops, such as snap bean, onion, and spring-planted radish, suffered severely reduced plant stands and, consequently, decreased yields. Yield of cabbage, a relatively salt tolerant crop, was not affected by SMC. Concentrations of K in all leaf tissues increased significantly as the level of SMC increased. Mg content in leaf tissue decreased.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SMC reduced soil bulk density and raised small pore space, pH, and electrical conductivity.

Taxon
Vegetablest0
Treatment
SMC applicatione0
Outcome
bulk densitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Verbatim

e0

“SMC application decreased bulk density and increased the percentage of small pore space, pH, and electrical conductivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–312 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber yield increased with SMC rate in 1981.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
rate of SMCe0
Outcome
Yields of cucumbere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of cucumber and snap bean increased and yield of onion decreased, as the rate of SMC increased in 1981.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Snap bean yield increased with SMC rate in 1981.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
rate of SMCe0
Outcome
yield of onione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of cucumber and snap bean increased and yield of onion decreased, as the rate of SMC increased in 1981.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion yield decreased with SMC rate in 1981.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
rate of SMCe0
Outcome
yield of onione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of cucumber and snap bean increased and yield of onion decreased, as the rate of SMC increased in 1981.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cabbage yield was not significantly affected by SMC.

Treatment
addition of SMCe0
Outcome
Yields of cabbagee0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of cabbage, radish, and tomato were not affected significantly by the addition of SMC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Radish yield was not significantly affected by SMC.

Treatment
addition of SMCe0
Outcome
Yields of cabbage, radishe0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of cabbage, radish, and tomato were not affected significantly by the addition of SMC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield was not significantly affected by SMC in the initial comparison.

Treatment
addition of SMCe0
Outcome
Yields of cabbage, radish, and tomatoe0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of cabbage, radish, and tomato were not affected significantly by the addition of SMC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield peaked at 10 kg/m 2 and declined at 20 kg/m 2 in 1982.

Treatment
SMCe0
Outcome
Tomato yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
10 kg/m 2e0
Comparator
20 kg/m 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato yield was maximum at 10 kg/m 2 , then declined as SMC was increased to 20 kg/m 2 in 1982.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–614 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber, fall-planted radish, spinach, and mustard yields followed the tomato response.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
Yield responsese0
Comparator
tomatoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield responses of cucumber, fall-planted radish, spinach, and mustard were similar to that of tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–717 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Snap bean stands and yields were severely reduced.

Taxon
snap beane0
Outcome
plant standse0
Direction
severely reducede0

Verbatim

e0

“Salt sensitive crops, such as snap bean, onion, and spring-planted radish, suffered severely reduced plant stands and, consequently, decreased yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–868 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion stands and yields were severely reduced.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
plant standse0
Direction
severely reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt sensitive crops, such as snap bean, onion, and spring-planted radish, suffered severely reduced plant stands and, consequently, decreased yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–868 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring-planted radish stands and yields were severely reduced.

Taxon
spring-planted radishe0
Outcome
plant standse0
Direction
severely reducede0

Verbatim

e0

“Salt sensitive crops, such as snap bean, onion, and spring-planted radish, suffered severely reduced plant stands and, consequently, decreased yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf potassium concentration increased with SMC level.

Taxon
Vegetablest0
Organ / stage
leaf tissuese0
Treatment
level of SMCe0
Outcome
Concentrations of K in all leaf tissuese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Concentrations of K in all leaf tissues increased significantly as the level of SMC increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf magnesium content decreased.

Taxon
Vegetablest0
Organ / stage
leaf tissuee0
Outcome
Mg content in leaf tissuee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mg content in leaf tissue decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–57 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results differ

112 papers: 107 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 107 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

108 papers more in this group

See all 112 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 263 positive, 25 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

376 papers: 331 positive, 45 negative or no effect

330 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

372 papers more in this group

See all 376 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

496 papers: 445 positive, 51 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 445 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

492 papers more in this group

See all 496 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 464 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.