Abstract
Abstract Spent mushroom compost (SMC) was used as a soil amendment for field-grown vegetables. Four rates (0, 2, 10, or 20 kg/m 2 ) of SMC were applied to a fine sandy loam in 1981 and 1982. SMC application decreased bulk density and increased the percentage of small pore space, pH, and electrical conductivity. Yields of cucumber and snap bean increased and yield of onion decreased, as the rate of SMC increased in 1981. Yields of cabbage, radish, and tomato were not affected significantly by the addition of SMC. Tomato yield was maximum at 10 kg/m 2 , then declined as SMC was increased to 20 kg/m 2 in 1982. Yield responses of cucumber, fall-planted radish, spinach, and mustard were similar to that of tomato. Salt sensitive crops, such as snap bean, onion, and spring-planted radish, suffered severely reduced plant stands and, consequently, decreased yields. Yield of cabbage, a relatively salt tolerant crop, was not affected by SMC. Concentrations of K in all leaf tissues increased significantly as the level of SMC increased. Mg content in leaf tissue decreased.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
SMC reduced soil bulk density and raised small pore space, pH, and electrical conductivity.
Verbatim
e0“SMC application decreased bulk density and increased the percentage of small pore space, pH, and electrical conductivity.”
t0“Vegetables”
Claim · model-written summary
Cucumber yield increased with SMC rate in 1981.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- rate of SMCe0
- Outcome
- Yields of cucumbere0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yields of cucumber and snap bean increased and yield of onion decreased, as the rate of SMC increased in 1981.”
Claim · model-written summary
Snap bean yield increased with SMC rate in 1981.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Yields of cucumber and snap bean increased and yield of onion decreased, as the rate of SMC increased in 1981.”
Claim · model-written summary
Onion yield decreased with SMC rate in 1981.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepae0 - Treatment
- rate of SMCe0
- Outcome
- yield of onione0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Yields of cucumber and snap bean increased and yield of onion decreased, as the rate of SMC increased in 1981.”
Claim · model-written summary
Cabbage yield was not significantly affected by SMC.
- Taxon
- cabbage
Brassica oleracea var. capitatae0 - Treatment
- addition of SMCe0
- Outcome
- Yields of cabbagee0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Yields of cabbage, radish, and tomato were not affected significantly by the addition of SMC.”
Claim · model-written summary
Radish yield was not significantly affected by SMC.
- Taxon
- radish
Raphanus sativuse0 - Treatment
- addition of SMCe0
- Outcome
- Yields of cabbage, radishe0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Yields of cabbage, radish, and tomato were not affected significantly by the addition of SMC.”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato yield was not significantly affected by SMC in the initial comparison.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- addition of SMCe0
- Outcome
- Yields of cabbage, radish, and tomatoe0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Yields of cabbage, radish, and tomato were not affected significantly by the addition of SMC.”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato yield peaked at 10 kg/m 2 and declined at 20 kg/m 2 in 1982.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- SMCe0
- Outcome
- Tomato yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 10 kg/m 2e0
- Comparator
- 20 kg/m 2e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Tomato yield was maximum at 10 kg/m 2 , then declined as SMC was increased to 20 kg/m 2 in 1982.”
Claim · model-written summary
Cucumber, fall-planted radish, spinach, and mustard yields followed the tomato response.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativuse0
- Outcome
- Yield responsese0
- Comparator
- tomatoe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield responses of cucumber, fall-planted radish, spinach, and mustard were similar to that of tomato.”
Claim · model-written summary
Snap bean stands and yields were severely reduced.
Verbatim
e0“Salt sensitive crops, such as snap bean, onion, and spring-planted radish, suffered severely reduced plant stands and, consequently, decreased yields.”
Claim · model-written summary
Onion stands and yields were severely reduced.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepae0 - Outcome
- plant standse0
- Direction
- severely reducede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Salt sensitive crops, such as snap bean, onion, and spring-planted radish, suffered severely reduced plant stands and, consequently, decreased yields.”
Claim · model-written summary
Spring-planted radish stands and yields were severely reduced.
Verbatim
e0“Salt sensitive crops, such as snap bean, onion, and spring-planted radish, suffered severely reduced plant stands and, consequently, decreased yields.”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf potassium concentration increased with SMC level.
- Taxon
- Vegetablest0
- Organ / stage
- leaf tissuese0
- Treatment
- level of SMCe0
- Outcome
- Concentrations of K in all leaf tissuese0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Concentrations of K in all leaf tissues increased significantly as the level of SMC increased.”
t0“Vegetables”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf magnesium content decreased.
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“Mg content in leaf tissue decreased.”
t0“Vegetables”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results differ
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 107 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
108 papers more in this group
See all 112 papers →fertilization · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
284 papers more in this group
See all 288 papers →fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
330 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
372 papers more in this group
See all 376 papers →fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 445 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
492 papers more in this group
See all 496 papers →fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 464 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
526 papers more in this group
See all 530 papers →fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
974 papers more in this group
See all 978 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.