Paper · 2002 · Agronomy Journal

Nitrogen Fertilizer Use Efficiency of Furrow‐Irrigated Onion and Corn

Ardell D. Halvorson; Ronald F. Follett; Michael E. Bartolo; et al.

11
claims
16
verbatim quotes
63
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Furrow‐irrigated onion ( Allium cepa L.) production, with high N fertilization rates, may be contributing NO 3 –N to ground water in southeastern Colorado. This study determined the growth and N uptake patterns of onion grown on a silty clay soil, N fertilizer use efficiency (NFUE) of onion, and recovery of residual N fertilizer by corn ( Zea mays L.) following onion in rotation. Onion was sampled biweekly from 18 May to 15 Sept. 1998 from plots receiving 0 and 224 kg N ha −1 . Nonlabeled N and labeled 15 N fertilizer were band‐applied near the onion row in split applications of 112 kg N ha −1 each on 18 May and 25 June. Onion dry matter accumulation was slow from planting to about late May, followed by a rapid increase in biomass production and N uptake. Because residual soil NO 3 –N was high, N fertilization resulted in only a small increase in bulb yield. Greatest demand for N by onion occurred during bulb development. Fertilizer N recovery by onion was 11 and 19% for May and June N applications (average 15%), respectively. Much of the fertilizer N remained in the upper 60‐cm soil profile at harvest and had moved toward the onion bed center. Fertilizer 15 N detected at 180‐cm soil depth indicated leaching losses from the root zone. The unfertilized 1999 corn crop recovered 24% of fertilizer N applied to onion for a total fertilizer N uptake by the two crops of 39%. Delaying N fertilizer application until onion bulbing begins may improve NFUE. Planting corn directly on the previous onion bed may result in greater N fertilizer recovery by corn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilization gave only a small increase in onion bulb yield because residual soil nitrate was high.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
N fertilizatione1
Outcome
bulb yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Qualifier
only a smalle1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furrow‐irrigated onion ( Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“Because residual soil NO 3 –N was high, N fertilization resulted in only a small increase in bulb yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–869 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion dry matter accumulation was slow until about late May and then increased rapidly with biomass production and N uptake.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furrow‐irrigated onion ( Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
e2

“Onion dry matter accumulation was slow from planting to about late May, followed by a rapid increase in biomass production and N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–764 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion N demand was greatest during bulb development.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae3
Organ / stage
bulb developmente3
Outcome
demand for Ne3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Greatest demand for N by onion occurred during bulb development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–934 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion recovered 11 and 19% of fertilizer N from the May and June applications.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae4
Outcome
Fertilizer N recoverye4
Value
11 and 19%e4
Qualifier
May and June N applicationse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Fertilizer N recovery by onion was 11 and 19% for May and June N applications (average 15%), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1041 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average onion fertilizer N recovery was 15%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae4
Outcome
Fertilizer N recoverye4
Value
15%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Fertilizer N recovery by onion was 11 and 19% for May and June N applications (average 15%), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1041 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Much of the fertilizer N remained in the upper 60 cm of the soil profile at harvest and had moved toward the onion bed center.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
remained in the upper 60‐cm soil profilee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furrow‐irrigated onion ( Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
e5

“Much of the fertilizer N remained in the upper 60‐cm soil profile at harvest and had moved toward the onion bed center”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer 15N detected at 180 cm depth indicated leaching losses from the root zone.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
Fertilizer 15 N detected at 180‐cm soil depthe6
Qualifier
leaching losses from the root zonee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furrow‐irrigated onion ( Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
e6

“Fertilizer 15 N detected at 180‐cm soil depth indicated leaching losses from the root zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The unfertilized 1999 corn crop recovered 24% of the fertilizer N applied to onion.

Outcome
recoverede7
Value
24%e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The unfertilized 1999 corn crop recovered 24% of fertilizer N applied to onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1333 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total fertilizer N uptake by the two crops was 39%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
total fertilizer N uptakee1
Value
39%e1
Qualifier
by the two cropse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furrow‐irrigated onion ( Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“for a total fertilizer N uptake by the two crops of 39%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1389 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying N fertilizer application until onion bulbing begins may improve NFUE.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Outcome
NFUEe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Delaying N fertilizer application until onion bulbing begins may improve NFUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1468 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Planting corn directly on the previous onion bed may give greater N fertilizer recovery by corn.

Outcome
N fertilizer recovery by corne1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Planting corn directly on the previous onion bed may result in greater N fertilizer recovery by corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1570 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.