Paper · 2011 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Effects of combined application of vermicompost and mineral fertilizer on the growth of Allium cepa L. and soil fertility

Pankaj Kumar Srivastava; Manjul Gupta; Rakesh Kumar Upadhyay; et al.

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
72
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The promotion of organic farming involves curtailing extensive use of mineral fertilizers. The present study was aimed to compare the effects of vermicompost (10 Mg ha –1 ), commercial mineral fertilizer (NPK—100:80:80), and their combination on (1) the growth of a major cash crop “onion” ( Allium cepa L.) and (2) the changes that may have occurred in the amended soil. The experiment was a randomized complete block design with four replications during the crop‐growing season of 2008/09. Results showed significantly higher plant growth in the combined/mix treatment of vermicompost and NPK, as measured by the vegetative growth of bulbs, number and length of tillers per bulb, and fresh weight of bulbs and by the biochemical characteristics of the onion tillers/leaves (total chlorophyll, caretenoids, protein, and total sugar contents). Comparison of the mixed treatment as compared to the control showed increases in bulb size (54%), total number of bulbs per bed (52%), and fresh weight of all bulbs (198%). The chemical properties and enzyme activity of the amended soil also improved significantly in the combined treatment as compared to the application of vermicompost or the mineral fertilizer alone. Total organic C, microbial biomass C, and sulfate content were significantly higher in the mix treatment, with increases of 60%, 127%, and 126%, respectively, as compared to those of the chemical‐fertilizer‐alone treatment. Similarly, β‐glucosidase, alkaline phosphatase, and dehydrogenase were significantly higher by 145%, 91%, 71%, respectively, in the mix treatment as compared to those of fertilizer‐alone application. This study indicates that application of a combination of mineral fertilizer and vermicompost in the field can positively influence the biological properties and fertility of soils, and support better plant growth, when compared to the application of mineral fertilizer or vermicompost alone. The study suggests that this combined application can reduce the quantity and cost of mineral‐fertilizers application for bulbous‐crop cultivation by 50%, while also sustaining soil biological activity of tropical and subtropical soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined vermicompost and NPK increased onion vegetative and bulb growth.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Treatment
combined/mix treatment of vermicompost and NPKe0
Outcome
vegetative growth of bulbs, number and length of tillers per bulb, and fresh weight of bulbse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed significantly higher plant growth in the combined/mix treatment of vermicompost and NPK, as measured by the vegetative growth of bulbs, number and length of tillers per bulb, and fresh weight of bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Allium cepa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined vermicompost and NPK increased onion leaf biochemical characteristics.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Organ / stage
tillers/leavese0
Treatment
combined/mix treatment of vermicompost and NPKe1
Outcome
total chlorophyll, caretenoids, protein, and total sugar contentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochemical characteristics of the onion tillers/leaves (total chlorophyll, caretenoids, protein, and total sugar contents)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–851 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed significantly higher plant growth in the combined/mix treatment of vermicompost and NPK, as measured by the vegetative growth of bulbs, number and length of tillers per bulb, and fresh weight of bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“combined application of vermicompost and mineral fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed treatment increased bulb size by 54% versus control.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Treatment
mixed treatmente0
Outcome
bulb sizee0
Direction
increasese0
Value
54%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparison of the mixed treatment as compared to the control showed increases in bulb size (54%), total number of bulbs per bed (52%), and fresh weight of all bulbs (198%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Allium cepa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed treatment increased bulbs per bed by 52% versus control.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Treatment
mixed treatmente0
Outcome
total number of bulbs per bede0
Direction
increasese0
Value
52%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparison of the mixed treatment as compared to the control showed increases in bulb size (54%), total number of bulbs per bed (52%), and fresh weight of all bulbs (198%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Allium cepa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed treatment increased fresh bulb weight by 198% versus control.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Treatment
mixed treatmente0
Outcome
fresh weight of all bulbse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
198%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparison of the mixed treatment as compared to the control showed increases in bulb size (54%), total number of bulbs per bed (52%), and fresh weight of all bulbs (198%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Allium cepa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mix treatment raised soil organic C by 60% versus fertilizer alone.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Treatment
mix treatmente0
Outcome
Total organic Ce0
Direction
highere0
Value
60%e0
Comparator
chemical‐fertilizer‐alone treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total organic C, microbial biomass C, and sulfate content were significantly higher in the mix treatment, with increases of 60%, 127%, and 126%, respectively, as compared to those of the chemical‐fertilizer‐alone treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1447 · show in text ↑
t0

“Allium cepa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mix treatment raised soil microbial biomass C by 127%.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Treatment
mix treatmente0
Outcome
microbial biomass Ce0
Direction
highere0
Value
127%e0
Comparator
chemical‐fertilizer‐alone treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total organic C, microbial biomass C, and sulfate content were significantly higher in the mix treatment, with increases of 60%, 127%, and 126%, respectively, as compared to those of the chemical‐fertilizer‐alone treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1447 · show in text ↑
t0

“Allium cepa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mix treatment raised soil sulfate by 126%.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Treatment
mix treatmente0
Outcome
sulfate contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
126%e0
Comparator
chemical‐fertilizer‐alone treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total organic C, microbial biomass C, and sulfate content were significantly higher in the mix treatment, with increases of 60%, 127%, and 126%, respectively, as compared to those of the chemical‐fertilizer‐alone treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1447 · show in text ↑
t0

“Allium cepa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mix treatment raised soil β-glucosidase by 145%.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Treatment
mix treatmente0
Outcome
β‐glucosidasee0
Direction
highere0
Value
145%e0
Comparator
fertilizer‐alone applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“β‐glucosidase, alkaline phosphatase, and dehydrogenase were significantly higher by 145%, 91%, 71%, respectively, in the mix treatment as compared to those of fertilizer‐alone application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Allium cepa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mix treatment raised soil alkaline phosphatase by 91%.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Treatment
mix treatmente0
Outcome
alkaline phosphatasee0
Direction
highere0
Value
91%e0
Comparator
fertilizer‐alone applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“β‐glucosidase, alkaline phosphatase, and dehydrogenase were significantly higher by 145%, 91%, 71%, respectively, in the mix treatment as compared to those of fertilizer‐alone application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Allium cepa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mix treatment raised soil dehydrogenase by 71%.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Treatment
mix treatmente0
Outcome
dehydrogenasee0
Direction
highere0
Value
71%e0
Comparator
fertilizer‐alone applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“β‐glucosidase, alkaline phosphatase, and dehydrogenase were significantly higher by 145%, 91%, 71%, respectively, in the mix treatment as compared to those of fertilizer‐alone application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Allium cepa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest combined fertilizer use could halve mineral fertilizer for bulb crops.

Taxon
Allium cepa L.Allium cepat0
Outcome
reduce the quantity and cost of mineral‐fertilizers applicatione0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
while also sustaining soil biological activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study suggests that this combined application can reduce the quantity and cost of mineral‐fertilizers application for bulbous‐crop cultivation by 50%, while also sustaining soil biological activity of tropical and subtropical soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1941–2177 · show in text ↑
t0

“Allium cepa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.