Paper · 2014 · Journal of Biopesticides

IN VITRO AND GREENHOUSE EVALUATION OF BOTANICAL EXTRACTS FOR ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY AGAINST PHYTHOPTHORA INFESTANS

Ngadze E

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate plant extracts for antifungal activities against Phythopthorainfestans (Mont.) de Bary, an important pathogen of potato which causes late blight disease. Acetone, ethyl acetate and water extracts of garlic (Allium sativum L.), Pawpaw (Carica papaya), Neem (Azadirachta indica), Mexican marigold (Tagetes minuta) and peri –winkle (Vinca rosea) were screened in vitro for their antifungal activities against Phythopthora infestans using the discagar infusion and microtitre doubledilution techniques. The same extracts were then tested for antifungal activity in vivo in the greenhouse on inoculated potato plants. The water extracts of Allium sativum and Azadirachta indica were active against Phythopthora infestans and had aminimum inhibitory concentration (MICs) of 1.65 mg/ml. MICs of Allium sativum, Azadirachtaindica and Tagetes minuta acetone extracts were 0.78, 3.13 and 6.5 mg/ml respectively against Phytophthora infestans. Allium sativum and Azadirachta indica water and acetone extracts performed well and they effectively reduced potato late blight in the greenhouse. These extracts compared well with the reductions due to application of Ridomil, a synthetic fungicide applied at 42.5g/l (active ingredient) and also with levels in the non-inoculated control. Allium sativumandAzadirachta indica were effective both in vitro and in vivo in controlling late blight have a potential to be used as fungicides against the disease. The plants are readily available and the extractionmethod is also simple and could lead to high adoption as fungicides by resource poor farmers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water extracts of Allium sativum and Azadirachta indica were active against Phytophthora infestans, with a MIC of 1.65 mg/ml.

Treatment
water extracts of Allium sativum and Azadirachta indicae2
Interactor
Phythopthora infestanse2pathogen
Outcome
active against Phythopthora infestanse2
Value
1.65 mg/mle2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an important pathogen of potato which causes late blight disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–199 · show in text ↑
e2

“The water extracts of Allium sativum and Azadirachta indica were active against Phythopthora infestans and had aminimum inhibitory concentration (MICs) of 1.65 mg/ml”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–825 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetone extract of Allium sativum had a MIC of 0.78 mg/ml against Phytophthora infestans.

Treatment
Allium sativume3
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse3pathogen
Outcome
MICse3
Value
0.78e3
Qualifier
acetone extractse3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an important pathogen of potato which causes late blight disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–199 · show in text ↑
e3

“MICs of Allium sativum, Azadirachta indica and Tagetes minuta acetone extracts were 0.78, 3.13 and 6.5 mg/ml respectively against Phytophthora infestans”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 827–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetone extract of Azadirachta indica had a MIC of 3.13 mg/ml against Phytophthora infestans.

Treatment
Azadirachta indicae3
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse3pathogen
Outcome
MICse3
Value
3.13e3
Qualifier
acetone extractse3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an important pathogen of potato which causes late blight disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–199 · show in text ↑
e3

“MICs of Allium sativum, Azadirachta indica and Tagetes minuta acetone extracts were 0.78, 3.13 and 6.5 mg/ml respectively against Phytophthora infestans”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 827–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetone extract of Tagetes minuta had a MIC of 6.5 mg/ml against Phytophthora infestans.

Treatment
Tagetes minutae3
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse3pathogen
Outcome
MICse3
Value
6.5e3
Qualifier
acetone extractse3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an important pathogen of potato which causes late blight disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–199 · show in text ↑
e3

“MICs of Allium sativum, Azadirachta indica and Tagetes minuta acetone extracts were 0.78, 3.13 and 6.5 mg/ml respectively against Phytophthora infestans”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 827–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water and acetone extracts of Allium sativum and Azadirachta indica performed well and reduced potato late blight in the greenhouse.

Treatment
water and acetone extractse4
Interactor
Phythopthorainfestanse1pathogen
Outcome
late blighte4
Direction
reducede4
Qualifier
performed welle4
Setting
greenhousee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an important pathogen of potato which causes late blight disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–199 · show in text ↑
e1

“evaluate plant extracts for antifungal activities against Phythopthorainfestans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–117 · show in text ↑
e4

“Allium sativum and Azadirachta indica water and acetone extracts performed well and they effectively reduced potato late blight in the greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts of Allium sativum and Azadirachta indica compared well with the late blight reductions from the synthetic fungicide Ridomil.

Treatment
extractse5
Outcome
reductionse5
Direction
compared welle5
Qualifier
and also with levels in the non-inoculated controle5
Comparator
Ridomile5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an important pathogen of potato which causes late blight disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–199 · show in text ↑
e5

“These extracts compared well with the reductions due to application of Ridomil, a synthetic fungicide applied at 42.5g/l (active ingredient) and also with levels in the non-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1318 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend that Allium sativum and Azadirachta indica extracts be used as fungicides against potato late blight.

Outcome
used as fungicides against the diseasee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an important pathogen of potato which causes late blight disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–199 · show in text ↑
e6

“have a potential to be used as fungicides against the disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1485 · show in text ↑

Azadirachta indica · Phytophthora infestans · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Allium sativum · Phytophthora infestans · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

botanical · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 65 positive, 5 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.