Paper · 2024 · Agriculture

The Effect of Renewable Phosphorus Biofertilizers on Selected Wheat Grain Quality Parameters

Magdalena Jastrzębska; Marta K. Kostrzewska; Agnieszka Saeid

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Recycling and reusing phosphorus in agriculture can reduce the consumption of natural phosphorus resources, which are continuing to shrink. Phosphorus fertilizers made from renewable raw materials (sewage sludge ash, animal bones, dried animal blood) and activated with phosphorus solubilizing microorganisms (Bacillus megaterium, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans) offer an alternative to conventional fertilizers. These products should meet consumer and environmental safety standards. In this paper, based on field experiments conducted in northeast Poland, the effects of waste-derived biofertilizers on selected parameters of wheat yield quality are discussed. The study focuses on the technological properties of the grain (hectoliter weight, hardness index, Zeleny index, starch, wet gluten, and protein content), the content of proteogenic amino acids, macro- and micronutrients, and selected toxic elements in the grain. The quality parameters of wheat grain were not affected by the tested biofertilizers applied in P doses up to 35.2 kg ha−1, nor by conventional fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested biofertilizers at P doses up to 35.2 kg ha−1 did not affect wheat grain technological quality parameters.

Treatment
tested biofertilizers applied in P doses up to 35.2 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
quality parameters of wheat graine0
Direction
not affectede0
Setting
northeast Polande1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The quality parameters of wheat grain were not affected by the tested biofertilizers applied in P doses up to 35.2 kg ha−1, nor by conventional fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1083 · show in text ↑
e1

“northeast Poland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional fertilizers did not affect wheat grain quality parameters.

Treatment
conventional fertilizerse0
Outcome
quality parameters of wheat graine0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The quality parameters of wheat grain were not affected by the tested biofertilizers applied in P doses up to 35.2 kg ha−1, nor by conventional fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1083 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 15 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

inoculation · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 146 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 146 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.