Abstract

A study was conducted to analyze the effect of different treatments of watering and N, P, K fertilization onthe protein components and processing quality of high quality wheat kernel. The results showed that efficient combinationof water and nitrogen fertilizer significantly increased the grain yield of wheat. The effect of water and fertilizer on thecomponents of protein is different: Albumin is sensitive to water treatment, but not sensitive to fertilizer treatments.Globulin is sensitive to water and N,P fertilizer treatments, but not sensitive to potassium fertilizer treatments. Gliadin issensitive to water and N fertilizer treatment. Glutelin content increased with the increase of N fertilizer. With the increase ofN fertilizer, the water absorbing rate and the content of wet gluten increased. With the decrease of irrigating times, thesedimentation, the dough development time and stability time significantly increased. Efficient combination of water andfertilizer are positive to grain yield and quality. In this experiment the grain yield and quality are high in the treatment of two-time irrigation and high N, P, K fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

An efficient water and nitrogen combination significantly increased wheat grain yield.

Treatment
combinationof water and nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficient combinationof water and nitrogen fertilizer significantly increased the grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–310 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Albumin was sensitive to water treatment but insensitive to fertilizer.

Treatment
water treatmente0
Outcome
Albumine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Albumin is sensitive to water treatment, but not sensitive to fertilizer treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Study on the Co-enhancing Regulating Effect of Fertilization and Watering on the Main Quality and Yield in Zhongyou9507 High Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Globulin was sensitive to water, nitrogen and phosphorus treatments but not potassium fertilizer.

Treatment
water and N,P fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
Globuline0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Globulin is sensitive to water and N,P fertilizer treatments, but not sensitive to potassium fertilizer treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–587 · show in text ↑
t0

“Study on the Co-enhancing Regulating Effect of Fertilization and Watering on the Main Quality and Yield in Zhongyou9507 High Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gliadin was sensitive to water and nitrogen fertilizer treatment.

Treatment
water and N fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
Gliadine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gliadin issensitive to water and N fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Study on the Co-enhancing Regulating Effect of Fertilization and Watering on the Main Quality and Yield in Zhongyou9507 High Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glutelin content increased with nitrogen fertilizer.

Treatment
N fertilizere0
Outcome
Glutelin contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glutelin content increased with the increase of N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“Study on the Co-enhancing Regulating Effect of Fertilization and Watering on the Main Quality and Yield in Zhongyou9507 High Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen fertilizer raised water absorbing rate and wet gluten content.

Treatment
N fertilizere0
Outcome
water absorbing rate and the content of wet glutene0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increase ofN fertilizer, the water absorbing rate and the content of wet gluten increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“Study on the Co-enhancing Regulating Effect of Fertilization and Watering on the Main Quality and Yield in Zhongyou9507 High Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fewer irrigations significantly increased sedimentation, dough development time and stability time.

Treatment
decrease of irrigating timese0
Outcome
thesedimentation, the dough development time and stability timee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the decrease of irrigating times, thesedimentation, the dough development time and stability time significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“Study on the Co-enhancing Regulating Effect of Fertilization and Watering on the Main Quality and Yield in Zhongyou9507 High Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations with high N, P and K gave high grain yield and quality.

Treatment
two-time irrigation and high N, P, K fertilizere0
Outcome
grain yield and qualitye0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain yield and quality are high in the treatment of two-time irrigation and high N, P, K fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Study on the Co-enhancing Regulating Effect of Fertilization and Watering on the Main Quality and Yield in Zhongyou9507 High Gluten Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–137 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

94 papers: 74 positive, 20 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

90 papers more in this group

See all 94 papers →

irrigation · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

irrigation · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

potassium · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

phosphorus · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 15 positive, 8 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 146 positive, 27 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 232 positive, 56 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.