Abstract
Abstract Pesticides are used to reduce yield losses and to enhance the visual quality of products. However, pesticide use raises concerns due to negative health and environmental effects, hence ambitious policy goals for their reduction have been established. Reducing pesticides which mainly focus on visual quality of products could be an efficient strategy to contribute to these goals, without reducing food production. However, the role of “cosmetic” pesticide use is so far not well documented and understood. Here, we quantify cosmetic pesticide use and the influence of supply chain characteristics on their use. We focus on table apple production, where the visual quality of products is a key aspect. Using a sample of 196 apple growers in Switzerland, we find that 23.5%–59.2% of growers use cosmetic pesticides for the apples’ visual appearance. Farms mainly marketing via intermediaries are 23.9‐29.6% more likely to spray cosmetic pesticides for visual purposes compared to farms mainly direct marketing. Our findings highlight the role of supply chains in farmer decision‐making, recommending a decrease in the focus on visual product quality, especially in retail environments, thus minimizing unnecessary and irreversible risks of pesticide exposure by farmers without compromising food security.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
An estimated 23.5%–59.2% of growers use cosmetic pesticides for apple appearance.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticae0 - Outcome
- growers use cosmetic pesticides for the apples’ visual appearancee0
- Value
- 23.5%–59.2%e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“23.5%–59.2% of growers use cosmetic pesticides for the apples’ visual appearance”
Claim · model-written summary
Farms marketing mainly through intermediaries were 23.9‐29.6% more likely to use cosmetic pesticides than direct marketers.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Outcome
- spray cosmetic pesticides for visual purposese0
- Direction
- more likelye0
- Value
- 23.9‐29.6%e0
- Comparator
- farms mainly direct marketinge0
- Setting
- Farms mainly marketing via intermediariese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Farms mainly marketing via intermediaries are 23.9‐29.6% more likely to spray cosmetic pesticides for visual purposes compared to farms mainly direct marketing”
t0“apple production”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend less emphasis on visual product quality, especially in retail environments.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Outcome
- a decrease in the focus on visual product qualitye0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Setting
- retail environmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“recommending a decrease in the focus on visual product quality, especially in retail environments”
t0“apple production”