Paper · 2024 · Agricultural Economics

Spraying for the beauty: Pesticide use for visual appearance in apple production

Lucca Zachmann; Chloe McCallum; Robert Finger

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Abstract Pesticides are used to reduce yield losses and to enhance the visual quality of products. However, pesticide use raises concerns due to negative health and environmental effects, hence ambitious policy goals for their reduction have been established. Reducing pesticides which mainly focus on visual quality of products could be an efficient strategy to contribute to these goals, without reducing food production. However, the role of “cosmetic” pesticide use is so far not well documented and understood. Here, we quantify cosmetic pesticide use and the influence of supply chain characteristics on their use. We focus on table apple production, where the visual quality of products is a key aspect. Using a sample of 196 apple growers in Switzerland, we find that 23.5%–59.2% of growers use cosmetic pesticides for the apples’ visual appearance. Farms mainly marketing via intermediaries are 23.9‐29.6% more likely to spray cosmetic pesticides for visual purposes compared to farms mainly direct marketing. Our findings highlight the role of supply chains in farmer decision‐making, recommending a decrease in the focus on visual product quality, especially in retail environments, thus minimizing unnecessary and irreversible risks of pesticide exposure by farmers without compromising food security.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An estimated 23.5%–59.2% of growers use cosmetic pesticides for apple appearance.

Outcome
growers use cosmetic pesticides for the apples’ visual appearancee0
Value
23.5%–59.2%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“23.5%–59.2% of growers use cosmetic pesticides for the apples’ visual appearance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–856 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farms marketing mainly through intermediaries were 23.9‐29.6% more likely to use cosmetic pesticides than direct marketers.

Outcome
spray cosmetic pesticides for visual purposese0
Direction
more likelye0
Value
23.9‐29.6%e0
Comparator
farms mainly direct marketinge0
Setting
Farms mainly marketing via intermediariese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Farms mainly marketing via intermediaries are 23.9‐29.6% more likely to spray cosmetic pesticides for visual purposes compared to farms mainly direct marketing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–80 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend less emphasis on visual product quality, especially in retail environments.

Outcome
a decrease in the focus on visual product qualitye0
Direction
decreasee0
Setting
retail environmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“recommending a decrease in the focus on visual product quality, especially in retail environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–80 · show in text ↑