Paper · 2024 · Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment

Comparative effects of legume‐based intercropping systems involving pigeon pea and cowpea under deep‐bed and conventional tillage systems in Malawi

Augustine Phiri; Keston Njira; Alan Dixon

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Leguminous‐based intercropping, combined with conservation agriculture, is a promising approach to improve soil fertility, crop yields, and sustainable land use for smallholder farmers in sub‐Saharan Africa, including Malawi. This study aimed to assess the effects of incorporating legume‐based intercropping systems involving pigeon pea ( Cajanus cajan ) and cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata ) into the deep bed farming (DBF) system promoted by Tiyeni in northern Malawi. The study used a split plot design with cropping systems (CS) as the main plots and tillage systems (TS) as the sub‐plots. All treatments were replicated three times. The study encompassed two cropping seasons, where CS included legume‐based treatments, sole cropped maize ( Zea mays ) without fertilizer (MZ) and sole cropped maize with 92 kg top dressing N fertilizer per hectare (MZ + 92), while TS included DBF and conventional tillage (CT). The study found that all plots with leguminous crops on both DBF and CT showed higher levels of ammonium (NH 4 + ), nitrate (NO 3 − ) and phosphorus (P) in the soil, but DBF had significantly higher levels over 2 years. Intercropping systems showed higher land productivity (land equivalent ratio > 1) than sole cropping in both years, indicating that legume‐based cropping can improve land use efficiency and yields. It can be noted from this study that intercropping systems based on cereals and legumes, implemented in DBF, has the potential to sustain agricultural intensification in sub‐Saharan African countries where access to chemical fertilizers is limited among smallholder farmers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leguminous crop plots had higher soil ammonium, nitrate, and phosphorus on both tillage systems.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
leguminous cropse0
Outcome
levels of ammonium (NH 4 + ), nitrate (NO 3 − ) and phosphorus (P) in the soile0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all plots with leguminous crops on both DBF and CT showed higher levels of ammonium (NH 4 + ), nitrate (NO 3 − ) and phosphorus (P) in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep bed farming had significantly higher soil nutrient levels over two years.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
DBFe0
Outcome
levelse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
over 2 yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DBF had significantly higher levels over 2 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping had greater land productivity than sole cropping in both years.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Intercropping systemse0
Outcome
land productivitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
land equivalent ratio > 1e0
Qualifier
both yearse0
Comparator
sole croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping systems showed higher land productivity (land equivalent ratio > 1) than sole cropping in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.