Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Food Microbiology

Monilinia fructicola genes involved in the cell wall-degrading process in early nectarine infection

Juan Diego Astacio; Paloma Melgarejo; Antonieta De Cal; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Brown rot symptoms may be linked to alterations in the gene expression pattern of genes associated with cell wall degradation. In this study, we identify key carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) involved in cell wall degradation by Monilinia fructicola, including pme2 and pme3 (pectin methylesterases), cut1 (cutinase) and nep2 (necrosis-inducing factor). The expression of these genes is significantly modulated by red and blue light during early nectarine infection. The polygalacturonase gene pg1 and the cellulase gene cel1 also exhibit photoinduction albeit to a lesser extent. Red and blue light cause an acceleration in the initial stages of brown rot development caused by M. fructicola on nectarines. Disease symptoms like tissue maceration were evident after an incubation period of 24 h followed by 14 h of light exposition, in contrast to the usual incubation period of 48 to 72 h. Furthermore, the culture media exerts an impact on gene regulation, suggesting a complex interplay between light and nutrient signalling pathways in M. fructicola. In addition, we observe that red light promotes colony growth on a 12 h photoperiod and consistently reduces conidiation. In contrast, blue light hampers growth rate on both the 12 h and the 8 h photoperiod but only diminishes conidiation on the 12 h photoperiod. These findings enhance our comprehension of genes associated with cell wall degradation and the environmental factors influencing brown rot development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Key CAZymes involved in Monilinia cell wall degradation were identified.

Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
Gene
pme2 and pme3e0
Outcome
cell wall degradatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we identify key carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) involved in cell wall degradation by Monilinia fructicola, including pme2 and pme3 (pectin methylesterases), cut1 (cutinase) and nep2 (necrosis-inducing factor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–356 · show in text ↑
t0

“nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Red and blue light significantly modulated expression of the named fungal genes in early infection.

Treatment
red and blue lighte0
Outcome
expression of these genese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The expression of these genes is significantly modulated by red and blue light during early nectarine infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–469 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungal pg1 and cel1 genes also showed weaker photoinduction.

Gene
pg1 and the cellulase gene cel1e0
Outcome
photoinductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The polygalacturonase gene pg1 and the cellulase gene cel1 also exhibit photoinduction albeit to a lesser extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red and blue light accelerated initial brown rot development on nectarines.

Treatment
Red and blue lighte0
Interactor
M. fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
Outcome
brown rot developmente0
Direction
acceleratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Red and blue light cause an acceleration in the initial stages of brown rot development caused by M. fructicola on nectarines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–710 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue maceration appeared after 24 hours plus 14 hours of light, earlier than usual.

Outcome
tissue maceratione0
Value
24 h followed by 14 he0
Qualifier
48 to 72 he0
Comparator
usual incubation periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disease symptoms like tissue maceration were evident after an incubation period of 24 h followed by 14 h of light exposition, in contrast to the usual incubation period of 48 to 72 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Culture medium affected fungal gene regulation.

Treatment
culture mediae0
Outcome
gene regulatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the culture media exerts an impact on gene regulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red light promoted fungal colony growth at a 12 hour photoperiod.

Treatment
red lighte0
Outcome
colony growthe0
Direction
promotese0
Qualifier
12 h photoperiode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red light promotes colony growth on a 12 h photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red light reduced fungal conidiation.

Treatment
red lighte0
Outcome
conidiatione0
Direction
reducese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red light promotes colony growth on a 12 h photoperiod and consistently reduces conidiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue light hampered fungal growth at both tested photoperiods.

Treatment
blue lighte0
Outcome
growth ratee0
Direction
hamperse0
Qualifier
both the 12 h and the 8 h photoperiode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“blue light hampers growth rate on both the 12 h and the 8 h photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue light diminished fungal conidiation only at a 12 hour photoperiod.

Treatment
blue lighte0
Outcome
conidiatione0
Direction
diminishese0
Qualifier
12 h photoperiode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“blue light hampers growth rate on both the 12 h and the 8 h photoperiod but only diminishes conidiation on the 12 h photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑

light · Monilinia fructicola · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.