Paper · 2023 · Journal of Fungi

Monilinia fructicola Response to White Light

Juan Diego Astacio; Eduardo Antonio Espeso; Paloma Melgarejo; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Light represents a powerful signal for the regulation of virulence in many microbial pathogens. Monilinia fructicola is the most virulent species causing brown rot in stone fruit crops. To understand the influence of light on M. fructicola, we measured the effect of white light and photoperiods on the colonial growth and sporulation of the model M. fructicola strain 38C on solid cultures. Searches in the M. fructicola 38C genome predicted a complete set of genes coding for photoreceptors possibly involved in the perception of all ranges of wavelengths. Since white light had an obvious negative effect on vegetative growth and the asexual development of M. fructicola 38C on potato dextrose agar, we studied how light influences photoresponse genes in M. fructicola during early peach infection and in liquid culture. The transcriptomes were analyzed in “Red Jim” nectarines infected by M. fructicola 38C and subjected to light pulses for 5 min and 14 h after 24 h of incubation in darkness. Specific light-induced genes were identified. Among these, we confirmed in samples from infected fruit or synthetic media that blue light photoreceptor vvd1 was among the highest expressed genes. An unknown gene, far1, coding for a small protein conserved in many families of Ascomycota phylum, was also highly induced by light. In contrast, a range of well-known photoreceptors displayed a low transcriptional response to light in M. fructicola from nectarines but not on the pathogen mycelium growing in liquid culture media for 6 days.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genome searches predicted a complete photoreceptor gene set in the pathogen.

Interactor
M. fructicola 38CMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
Outcome
complete set of genes coding for photoreceptorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Searches in the M. fructicola 38C genome predicted a complete set of genes coding for photoreceptors possibly involved in the perception of all ranges of wavelengths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–557 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola Response to White Light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“The transcriptomes were analyzed in “Red Jim” nectarines infected by M. fructicola 38C and subjected to light pulses for 5 min and 14 h after 24 h of incubation in darkness. Specific light-induced genes were identified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–1043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White light negatively affected pathogen vegetative growth and asexual development on agar.

Treatment
white lighte0
Interactor
M. fructicola 38CMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
Outcome
vegetative growth and the asexual development of M. fructicola 38Ce0
Direction
negative effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“white light had an obvious negative effect on vegetative growth and the asexual development of M. fructicola 38C on potato dextrose agar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola Response to White Light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“The transcriptomes were analyzed in “Red Jim” nectarines infected by M. fructicola 38C and subjected to light pulses for 5 min and 14 h after 24 h of incubation in darkness. Specific light-induced genes were identified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–1043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light induced specific pathogen genes in infected nectarines.

Material
“Red Jim”e0
Treatment
light pulsese0
Interactor
M. fructicola 38CMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
Outcome
light-induced genese0
Direction
light-inducede0
Comparator
darknesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The transcriptomes were analyzed in “Red Jim” nectarines infected by M. fructicola 38C and subjected to light pulses for 5 min and 14 h after 24 h of incubation in darkness. Specific light-induced genes were identified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–1043 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pathogen blue light photoreceptor vvd1 was among the highest expressed genes in infected fruit or media.

Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Gene
vvd1e0
Outcome
highest expressed genese0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we confirmed in samples from infected fruit or synthetic media that blue light photoreceptor vvd1 was among the highest expressed genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola Response to White Light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“The transcriptomes were analyzed in “Red Jim” nectarines infected by M. fructicola 38C and subjected to light pulses for 5 min and 14 h after 24 h of incubation in darkness. Specific light-induced genes were identified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–1043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light highly induced the pathogen gene far1.

Treatment
lighte0
Interactor
Monilinia fructicolaMonilinia fructicolat0pathogen
Gene
far1e0
Outcome
far1e0
Direction
highly inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An unknown gene, far1, coding for a small protein conserved in many families of Ascomycota phylum, was also highly induced by light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1325 · show in text ↑
t0

“Monilinia fructicola Response to White Light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“The transcriptomes were analyzed in “Red Jim” nectarines infected by M. fructicola 38C and subjected to light pulses for 5 min and 14 h after 24 h of incubation in darkness. Specific light-induced genes were identified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–1043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Known pathogen photoreceptors responded weakly to light in nectarines but not in liquid culture.

Treatment
lighte0
Interactor
M. fructicolaMonilinia fructicolae0pathogen
Outcome
transcriptional responsee0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
pathogen mycelium growing in liquid culture mediae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructicola
Monilinia fructicola · InteractorMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a range of well-known photoreceptors displayed a low transcriptional response to light in M. fructicola from nectarines but not on the pathogen mycelium growing in liquid culture media for 6 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1535 · show in text ↑

light · Monilinia fructicola · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.