Paper · 2017 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Evaluation of Growth and Yield Stability of Wheat by Application of Trichoderma and Enterobacter sp.

Faezeh Mohammadi Kashka; Hemmatollah Pirdashti; Yasser Yaghoubian; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Abstract This study was carried out to study the effect of biopriming using Trichoderma hamatum and Enterobacter sp. as plant growth promoting on some morphological characteristics and grain yield (GY) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. ‘Milan’). A field experiment was conducted in a split factorial arrengment based on randomized complete block design with three replications in Sari (Soteh village) during 2014-2015. Three levels of triple super phosphate (TSP; zero, 50 and 100 kg.ha-1) were applied as the main plot and both fungal (inoculation with Trichoderma hamatum and uninoculated as control) and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) inoculations (inoculation with Enterobacter sp. and uninoculated as control), were served as the sub-plots. The results indicate a positive effect of both fungal and PSB inoculations on the most studied traits of wheat. Enterobacter sp. increased GY by 19, 7, and 26% when used with zero, 50 and 100 kg.ha-1 of TSP, respectively. In addition, Trichoderma hamatum increased GY and biological yield (BY) by 13 and 10%, respectively, as compared to the control conditions. Enterobacter sp. inoculation along with Trichoderma hamatum enhanced the values of all studied triats such as panicle length (4%), GY (21%) and (10%) as compared to the control. Therefore, these environmental friendly microorganisms can be used as an effective seed inoculants to improve grain yield of wheat and to decrease over application of P fertilizers and also could be useful tools for soil productivity, particularly when were used along with TSP as compared to the application of TSP alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal and PSB inoculations positively affected most studied wheat traits.

Treatment
fungal and PSB inoculationse0
Interactor
Trichoderma hamatumTrichoderma hamatume1symbiont
Second interactor
Enterobacter sp.Enterobactere1symbiont
Outcome
most studied traits of wheate0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma hamatum
Trichoderma hamatum · InteractorGarrett Taylor · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Enterobacter
Enterobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicate a positive effect of both fungal and PSB inoculations on the most studied traits of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–865 · show in text ↑
e1

“biopriming using Trichoderma hamatum and Enterobacter sp. as plant growth promoting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enterobacter inoculation increased wheat grain yield by 19% without TSP.

Treatment
Enterobacter sp.e0
Interactor
Enterobacter sp.Enterobactere0symbiont
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19e0
Qualifier
zeroe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter
Enterobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enterobacter sp. increased GY by 19, 7, and 26% when used with zero, 50 and 100 kg.ha-1 of TSP, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–975 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield (GY) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. ‘Milan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enterobacter inoculation increased wheat grain yield by 7% with 50 kg.ha-1 TSP.

Treatment
Enterobacter sp.e0
Interactor
Enterobacter sp.Enterobactere0symbiont
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7e0
Qualifier
50e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter
Enterobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enterobacter sp. increased GY by 19, 7, and 26% when used with zero, 50 and 100 kg.ha-1 of TSP, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–975 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield (GY) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. ‘Milan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enterobacter inoculation increased wheat grain yield by 26% with 100 kg.ha-1 TSP.

Treatment
Enterobacter sp.e0
Interactor
Enterobacter sp.Enterobactere0symbiont
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26%e0
Qualifier
100 kg.ha-1 of TSPe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter
Enterobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enterobacter sp. increased GY by 19, 7, and 26% when used with zero, 50 and 100 kg.ha-1 of TSP, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–975 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield (GY) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. ‘Milan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma increased wheat grain yield by 13% versus control.

Treatment
Trichoderma hamatume0
Interactor
Trichoderma hamatumTrichoderma hamatume0symbiont
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13e0
Comparator
control conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma hamatum
Trichoderma hamatum · InteractorGarrett Taylor · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trichoderma hamatum increased GY and biological yield (BY) by 13 and 10%, respectively, as compared to the control conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1115 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield (GY) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. ‘Milan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma increased wheat biological yield by 10% versus control.

Treatment
Trichoderma hamatume0
Interactor
Trichoderma hamatumTrichoderma hamatume0symbiont
Outcome
biological yield (BY)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
control conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma hamatum
Trichoderma hamatum · InteractorGarrett Taylor · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trichoderma hamatum increased GY and biological yield (BY) by 13 and 10%, respectively, as compared to the control conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1115 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield (GY) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. ‘Milan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Joint Enterobacter and Trichoderma inoculation enhanced wheat panicle length by 4%.

Treatment
Enterobacter sp. inoculation along with Trichoderma hamatume0
Interactor
Enterobacter sp.Enterobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
Trichoderma hamatumTrichoderma hamatume0symbiont
Outcome
panicle lengthe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
4%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter
Enterobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma hamatum
Trichoderma hamatum · Second interactorGarrett Taylor · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enterobacter sp. inoculation along with Trichoderma hamatum enhanced the values of all studied triats such as panicle length (4%), GY (21%) and (10%) as compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1293 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield (GY) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. ‘Milan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Joint inoculation enhanced wheat grain yield by 21%.

Treatment
Enterobacter sp. inoculation along with Trichoderma hamatume0
Interactor
Enterobacter sp.Enterobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
Trichoderma hamatumTrichoderma hamatume0symbiont
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
21%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter
Enterobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma hamatum
Trichoderma hamatum · Second interactorGarrett Taylor · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enterobacter sp. inoculation along with Trichoderma hamatum enhanced the values of all studied triats such as panicle length (4%), GY (21%) and (10%) as compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1293 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield (GY) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. ‘Milan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Joint inoculation enhanced an unnamed wheat trait by 10%.

Treatment
Enterobacter sp. inoculation along with Trichoderma hamatume0
Interactor
Enterobacter sp.Enterobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
Trichoderma hamatumTrichoderma hamatume0symbiont
Outcome
all studied triatse0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter
Enterobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma hamatum
Trichoderma hamatum · Second interactorGarrett Taylor · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enterobacter sp. inoculation along with Trichoderma hamatum enhanced the values of all studied triats such as panicle length (4%), GY (21%) and (10%) as compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1293 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield (GY) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. ‘Milan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–245 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend these microbes as wheat seed inoculants to improve yield and reduce excessive P fertilizer use.

Interactor
Trichoderma hamatumTrichoderma hamatume1symbiont
Second interactor
Enterobacter sp.Enterobactere1symbiont
Outcome
effective seed inoculants to improve grain yield of wheat and to decrease over application of P fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma hamatum
Trichoderma hamatum · InteractorGarrett Taylor · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Enterobacter
Enterobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these environmental friendly microorganisms can be used as an effective seed inoculants to improve grain yield of wheat and to decrease over application of P fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1474 · show in text ↑
e1

“biopriming using Trichoderma hamatum and Enterobacter sp. as plant growth promoting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–142 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest the microbes support soil productivity, particularly with TSP.

Outcome
useful tools for soil productivitye0
Qualifier
along with TSPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“could be useful tools for soil productivity, particularly when were used along with TSP as compared to the application of TSP alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1616 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield (GY) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. ‘Milan’)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–245 · show in text ↑

Enterobacter · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

inoculation · Trichoderma hamatum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.