Paper · 1999 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effect of management practices on mycorrhizal infection, growth and dry matter partitioning in field-grown bean Efeito de práticas culturais sobre a infecção micorrízica, crescimento e partição da matéria seca de feijão-vagem

Antonio Alberto Rocha Oliveira; Francis Edward Sanders

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The experiment was carried out on unsterilized field soil with low phosphorus availability with the objective of examining the effect of cultural practices on mycorrhizal colonization and growth of common bean. The treatments were: three pre-crops (maize, wheat and fallow) followed by three soil management practices ("ploughing", mulching and bare fallow without "ploughing" during the winter months). After the cultural practices, Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Canadian Wonder was grown in this soil. Fallowing and soil disturbance reduced natural soil infectivity. Mycorrhizal infection of the bean roots occurred more rapidly in the recently cropped soil than in the fallow soil. Prior cropping with a strongly mycorrhizal plant (maize) increased infectivity even further. O experimento foi realizado em solo não-esterilizado com baixo teor de fósforo. Os tratamentos foram: três pré-cultivos (milho, trigo e solo nu), seguidos por três manejos do solo (distúrbio mecânico do solo, cobertura morta e solo nu sem distúrbio no inverno). No ano seguinte à aplicação dos tratamentos, a área experimental foi semeada com Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Canadian Wonder. Os tratamentos com solo nu e o submetido a distúrbio mecânico exibiram as menores densidades de esporos de fungos micorrízicos e reduzida infecção radicular do feijoeiro. A infecção micorrízica foi maior nas parcelas anteriormente cultivadas com cereais, especialmente no pré-cultivo com milho.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fallowing reduced natural soil mycorrhizal infectivity.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Canadian WonderPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
Fallowinge0
Interactor
mycorrhizale2symbiont
Outcome
natural soil infectivitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fallowing and soil disturbance reduced natural soil infectivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–560 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Canadian Wonder was grown in this soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–495 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mycorrhizal infection of the bean roots occurred more rapidly in the recently cropped soil than in the fallow soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil disturbance reduced natural soil mycorrhizal infectivity.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Canadian WonderPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
soil disturbancee0
Interactor
mycorrhizale2symbiont
Outcome
natural soil infectivitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fallowing and soil disturbance reduced natural soil infectivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–560 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Canadian Wonder was grown in this soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–495 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mycorrhizal infection of the bean roots occurred more rapidly in the recently cropped soil than in the fallow soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–676 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bean roots became mycorrhizally infected more rapidly in recently cropped soil than in fallow soil.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Canadian WonderPhaseolus vulgarise1
Organ / stage
bean rootse0
Treatment
recently cropped soile0
Outcome
Mycorrhizal infection of the bean rootse0
Direction
more rapidlye0
Comparator
fallow soile0

Not reportedInteractorInteractor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal infection of the bean roots occurred more rapidly in the recently cropped soil than in the fallow soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–676 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Canadian Wonder was grown in this soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior maize cropping further increased soil mycorrhizal infectivity.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Canadian WonderPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
Prior cropping with a strongly mycorrhizal plant (maize)e0
Outcome
infectivitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prior cropping with a strongly mycorrhizal plant (maize) increased infectivity even further”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–769 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Canadian Wonder was grown in this soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–495 · show in text ↑

Zea mays · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

rotation · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

soil · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.