Abstract
The aim of this study was the mycorrhizae inoculation effect on production and mineral nutrition of snap bean variety under low phosphorus intake. The experiment was a randomized block design with four treatments: a non-mycorrhizal control, two mycorrhizal strains: Piriformospora indica (Piri), Glomus intraradice (Glomus), and their combined inoculation Piri + Glomus; using ten replicates per treatment.A comparative trial of different treatments on plant growth, yield parameters, mineral absorption and mycorrhizae colonization frequency was conducted in the greenhouse under controlled conditions using autoclaved soil-sand-vermiculite substrate. The inoculation with Piri and co-inoculation with Piri + Glomus significantly increased aerial dry biomass (p ≤ 0.01) and highly increased root dry biomass (p ≤ 0.001). Mycorrhizal snap bean plants showed a significantly higher number of pods, pods dry weight, dry weight of seeds per plant, and percentage of mycorrhizal colonization than non-mycorrhizal plants. Mycorrhizae inoculation increased significantly nitrogen and phosphorus uptake that the inoculation with Piri increased N uptake in roots by 187% and P uptake by 200% compared to the non-inoculated plants. For cations leave incorporation, Piri significantly enhanced Ca2+ by 100%, Mg2+ by 110% and NH4+ by 175% relative to the non-mycorrhizal plants. While mycorrhizal inoculation doesn’t have a significant effect on K+ nutrition.In conclusion, snap bean Contender variety seedling inoculated with Piri proved to be most effective by improving plant growth, mineral nutrition and yield production under low phosphorus uptake.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Piri inoculation significantly increased aerial dry biomass.
- Taxon
- Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgarist0 - Treatment
- inoculation with Pirie0
- Interactor
- Pirie0symbiont
- Outcome
- aerial dry biomasse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The inoculation with Piri and co-inoculation with Piri + Glomus significantly increased aerial dry biomass (p ≤ 0.01) and highly increased root dry biomass (p ≤ 0.001).”
t0“Phaseolus vulgaris”
Claim · model-written summary
Piri plus Glomus co-inoculation significantly increased aerial dry biomass.
- Taxon
- Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- co-inoculation with Piri + Glomuse0
- Interactor
- Pirie0symbiont
- Outcome
- aerial dry biomasse0
- Direction
- increasede0
GlomusNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The inoculation with Piri and co-inoculation with Piri + Glomus significantly increased aerial dry biomass (p ≤ 0.01) and highly increased root dry biomass (p ≤ 0.001).”
t0“Phaseolus vulgaris”
Claim · model-written summary
Piri inoculation significantly increased root dry biomass.
- Taxon
- Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- inoculation with Pirie0
- Interactor
- Pirie0symbiont
- Outcome
- root dry biomasse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The inoculation with Piri and co-inoculation with Piri + Glomus significantly increased aerial dry biomass (p ≤ 0.01) and highly increased root dry biomass (p ≤ 0.001).”
t0“Phaseolus vulgaris”
Claim · model-written summary
Piri plus Glomus co-inoculation significantly increased root dry biomass.
- Taxon
- Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- co-inoculation with Piri + Glomuse0
- Interactor
- Pirie0symbiont
- Outcome
- root dry biomasse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The inoculation with Piri and co-inoculation with Piri + Glomus significantly increased aerial dry biomass (p ≤ 0.01) and highly increased root dry biomass (p ≤ 0.001).”
t0“Phaseolus vulgaris”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal snap beans had significantly higher pod numbers, pod dry weight and seed dry weight per plant than non-mycorrhizal plants.
Verbatim
e0“Mycorrhizal snap bean plants showed a significantly higher number of pods, pods dry weight, dry weight of seeds per plant, and percentage of mycorrhizal colonization than non-mycorrhizal plants.”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal snap beans had significantly higher mycorrhizal colonization percentages.
Verbatim
e0“Mycorrhizal snap bean plants showed a significantly higher number of pods, pods dry weight, dry weight of seeds per plant, and percentage of mycorrhizal colonization than non-mycorrhizal plants.”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly increased nitrogen and phosphorus uptake.
- Taxon
- Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Mycorrhizae inoculatione0
- Interactor
- Mycorrhizaee0symbiont
- Outcome
- nitrogen and phosphorus uptakee0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mycorrhizae inoculation increased significantly nitrogen and phosphorus uptake”
t0“Phaseolus vulgaris”
Claim · model-written summary
Piri inoculation increased root nitrogen uptake by 187% compared with non-inoculated plants.
- Taxon
- Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
- Organ / stage
- rootse0
- Treatment
- inoculation with Pirie0
- Interactor
- Pirie0symbiont
- Outcome
- N uptakee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 187%e0
- Comparator
- non-inoculated plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mycorrhizae inoculation increased significantly nitrogen and phosphorus uptake that the inoculation with Piri increased N uptake in roots by 187% and P uptake by 200% compared to the non-inoculated plants.”
t0“Phaseolus vulgaris”
Claim · model-written summary
Piri inoculation increased phosphorus uptake by 200% compared with non-inoculated plants.
- Taxon
- Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- inoculation with Pirie0
- Interactor
- Pirie0symbiont
- Outcome
- P uptakee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 200%e0
- Comparator
- non-inoculated plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mycorrhizae inoculation increased significantly nitrogen and phosphorus uptake that the inoculation with Piri increased N uptake in roots by 187% and P uptake by 200% compared to the non-inoculated plants.”
t0“Phaseolus vulgaris”
Claim · model-written summary
Piri significantly enhanced leaf calcium incorporation by 100%.
- Taxon
- Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Pirie0
- Interactor
- Pirie0symbiont
- Outcome
- Ca2+e0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 100%e0
- Comparator
- non-mycorrhizal plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For cations leave incorporation, Piri significantly enhanced Ca2+ by 100%, Mg2+ by 110% and NH4+ by 175% relative to the non-mycorrhizal plants.”
t0“Phaseolus vulgaris”
Claim · model-written summary
Piri significantly enhanced leaf magnesium incorporation by 110%.
- Taxon
- Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Pirie0
- Interactor
- Pirie0symbiont
- Outcome
- Mg2+e0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 110%e0
- Comparator
- non-mycorrhizal plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For cations leave incorporation, Piri significantly enhanced Ca2+ by 100%, Mg2+ by 110% and NH4+ by 175% relative to the non-mycorrhizal plants.”
t0“Phaseolus vulgaris”
Claim · model-written summary
Piri significantly enhanced leaf ammonium incorporation by 175%.
- Taxon
- Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Pirie0
- Interactor
- Pirie0symbiont
- Outcome
- NH4+e0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 175%e0
- Comparator
- non-mycorrhizal plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For cations leave incorporation, Piri significantly enhanced Ca2+ by 100%, Mg2+ by 110% and NH4+ by 175% relative to the non-mycorrhizal plants.”
t0“Phaseolus vulgaris”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal inoculation did not significantly affect potassium nutrition.
- Taxon
- Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- mycorrhizal inoculatione0
- Outcome
- K+ nutritione0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“While mycorrhizal inoculation doesn’t have a significant effect on K+ nutrition.”
t0“Phaseolus vulgaris”
Claim · model-written summary
Piri-inoculated Contender snap bean seedlings were judged most effective in improving growth, mineral nutrition and yield under low phosphorus.
- Taxon
- snap beane0
- Material
- Contendere0
- Treatment
- inoculated with Pirie0
- Interactor
- Pirie0symbiont
- Outcome
- plant growth, mineral nutrition and yield productione0
- Direction
- improvinge0
- Qualifier
- under low phosphorus uptakee0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“In conclusion, snap bean Contender variety seedling inoculated with Piri proved to be most effective by improving plant growth, mineral nutrition and yield production under low phosphorus uptake.”
The same questions in other papers
Glomus · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
inoculation · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ
105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
122 papers more in this group
See all 126 papers →mycorrhiza · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
191 papers more in this group
See all 195 papers →mycorrhiza · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.