Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mycorrhizal infection increased root specific phosphorus absorption in low P bean plants.

A claim from Effects of phosphorus availability and vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizas on the carbon budget of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) · 1998

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal infection increased root specific phosphorus absorption in low P bean plants.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
Mycorrhizal infectione0
Outcome
root specific P absorption ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal infection in low‐P plants increased the root specific P absorption rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–618
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–107

Title

Effects of phosphorus availability and vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizas on the carbon budget of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)

KAI L. NIELSEN; TJEERD J. BOUMA; JONATHAN P. LYNCH; et al. New Phytologist 1998. doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00242.x

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-9ef660afebf97df0e81d92683377535b1f60ab8e3f1711c4ebf358bd5cb49343 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

infection · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.