Paper · 2016 · Food & Pharma International

Acid Phosphatase Enzyme Activity and Various Growth Parameters of Common Bean as Influenced by Applications of Different Biofertilizers with Different Levels of Phosphorus Under Intercropping System

M Hussain Dar; S Shahid; Nisha Kataria; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present study was conducted during kharif seasons of 2012 and 2013 at the Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) of Shere-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Budgam, Jammu and Kashmir. The climate of the experimental site was temperate with mild summers and cold winters, showing wide variations in mean maximum and minimum temperatures.. Common bean variety “Shalimar Rajmash-1” and maize variety “C-15” were used for the present study. The experiment was laid out in a complete randomized design (CRD) with each treatment replicated three times. Different levels of DAP (20 and 40 kg) along with different biofertilizer combinations like Rhizobium (Rhizobium leguminosarum), Azotobacter (Azotobacter vinelandi), VAM (Glomus mosseae) have been used during the research. The results of the experiment revealed that the growth, in terms of morphology and physiology, of all the inoculated plants was much better as compared to control plants. The various growth parameters like plant height, fresh and dry weights and length of the roots of the plants inoculated with Rhizobium + VAM @ 20 kg P/ha did best as compared to other treatments as well as control. Rhizobium + VAM @ 20 kg P/ha in the present research also showed significant impact on acid phosphatase activity in roots of common bean. Significant increase in N, P and K uptake was recorded when plants were inoculated with Rhizobium + VAM @ 20 kg P/ha. Overall the significant increase in growth and development was due to positive interactions among different microorganisms leading to healthy and vigorously growing plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated plants grew better than controls.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
inoculatede0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
much bettere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth, in terms of morphology and physiology, of all the inoculated plants was much better as compared to control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium plus VAM at 20 kg P/ha gave the best plant height, fresh and dry weights, and root length.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Rhizobium + VAM @ 20 kg P/hae0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
plant height, fresh and dry weights and length of the rootse0
Direction
did beste0
Comparator
other treatments as well as controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, fresh and dry weights and length of the roots of the plants inoculated with Rhizobium + VAM @ 20 kg P/ha did best as compared to other treatments as well as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium plus VAM at 20 kg P/ha significantly affected bean root acid phosphatase activity.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
Rhizobium + VAM @ 20 kg P/hae0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
acid phosphatase activity in rootse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizobium + VAM @ 20 kg P/ha in the present research also showed significant impact on acid phosphatase activity in roots of common bean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1312 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium plus VAM at 20 kg P/ha significantly increased N, P and K uptake.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Rhizobium + VAM @ 20 kg P/hae0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
N, P and K uptakee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase in N, P and K uptake was recorded when plants were inoculated with Rhizobium + VAM @ 20 kg P/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1430 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–77 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute vigorous growth to positive microbial interactions.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
growth and developmente0
Qualifier
positive interactions among different microorganismse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the significant increase in growth and development was due to positive interactions among different microorganisms leading to healthy and vigorously growing plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–77 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.