Paper · 2017 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Effects of Rhizobium inoculation and cropping systems on macronutrients uptake and partitioning in two legumes (Common bean and Lablab)

Prosper I. Massawe; Kelvin M. Mtei; Linus K. Munishi; et al.

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The study to investigate the effect of Rhizobium inoculation and cropping systems on the uptake of macronutrients in shoot, root and whole plant of Phaseolus vulgaris and Lablab purpureus was conducted at Selian Agricultural Research Institute (SARI) for two cropping seasons. A randomized complete block design was used in a 3-factorial arrangement with two levels of Rhizobium (with and without rhizobia), two legumes (P. vulgaris and L. purpureus) and five cropping systems (sole maize or sole legumes, 1 row maize to 1 row legumes (1:1) i.e. 0 m or 0.45 m of legume from maize row, 1 row maize to 2 rows of legumes (1:2) i.e. 0.1 m or 0.2 m of legumes from maize rows). The result showed that Rhizobium inoculation significantly (P£0.001) increased the uptake of N, P, K, Ca and Mg in the plant parts and whole plant. Similarly, cropping systems significantly (P£0.001) increased the uptake of N, K and Mg in shoots and whole plant of P. vulgaris and L. purpureus but decreased the P and Ca content in roots. Legumes significantly increased the uptake of the macronutrients in shoots and roots but more nutrients concentration in shoots than roots for both cropping seasons. There were significant (P£0.001) interaction between; Rhizobium x legumes x cropping systems on whole plant uptake of N in cropping season 1 and 2. Regardless of the type of interaction, inoculated legumes maximized the uptake of macronutrients in shoots, roots and whole plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation significantly increased N, P, K, Ca and Mg uptake in Phaseolus vulgaris plant parts and whole plants.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
uptake of N, P, K, Ca and Mge1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phaseolus vulgaris and Lablab purpureus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation significantly (P£0.001) increased the uptake of N, P, K, Ca and Mg in the plant parts and whole plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation significantly increased N, P, K, Ca and Mg uptake in Lablab purpureus plant parts and whole plants.

Taxon
Lablab purpureusLablab purpureuse0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
uptake of N, P, K, Ca and Mge1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lablab purpureus
Lablab purpureus · TaxonTaken by Fanghong · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phaseolus vulgaris and Lablab purpureus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation significantly (P£0.001) increased the uptake of N, P, K, Ca and Mg in the plant parts and whole plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping systems significantly increased N, K and Mg uptake in Phaseolus vulgaris shoots and whole plants.

Taxon
P. vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
cropping systemse0
Outcome
uptake of N, K and Mg in shoots and whole plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cropping systems significantly (P£0.001) increased the uptake of N, K and Mg in shoots and whole plant of P. vulgaris and L. purpureus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–967 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping systems significantly increased N, K and Mg uptake in Lablab purpureus shoots and whole plants.

Taxon
L. purpureusLablab purpureuse0
Treatment
cropping systemse0
Outcome
uptake of N, K and Mg in shoots and whole plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lablab purpureus
Lablab purpureus · TaxonTaken by Fanghong · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cropping systems significantly (P£0.001) increased the uptake of N, K and Mg in shoots and whole plant of P. vulgaris and L. purpureus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–967 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping systems decreased P and Ca content in Phaseolus vulgaris roots.

Taxon
P. vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Outcome
P and Ca content in rootse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. vulgaris and L. purpureus but decreased the P and Ca content in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping systems decreased P and Ca content in Lablab purpureus roots.

Taxon
L. purpureusLablab purpureuse0
Outcome
P and Ca content in rootse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lablab purpureus
Lablab purpureus · TaxonTaken by Fanghong · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. vulgaris and L. purpureus but decreased the P and Ca content in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1011 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Legume species differed significantly in macronutrient uptake in shoots and roots, with higher concentration in shoots in both seasons.

Taxon
Legumese0
Organ / stage
shoots and rootse0
Outcome
nutrients concentratione0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
rootse0

Verbatim

e0

“Legumes significantly increased the uptake of the macronutrients in shoots and roots but more nutrients concentration in shoots than roots for both cropping seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1177 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium, legume species and cropping system interacted significantly for whole-plant N uptake in both seasons.

Taxon
legumese1
Treatment
Rhizobium x legumes x cropping systemse1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
whole plant uptake of Ne1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizobium x legumes x cropping systems on whole plant uptake of N in cropping season 1 and 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1325 · show in text ↑
e1

“There were significant (P£0.001) interaction between; Rhizobium x legumes x cropping systems on whole plant uptake of N in cropping season 1 and 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated legumes maximized macronutrient uptake in shoots, roots and whole plants.

Taxon
legumese0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
uptake of macronutrientse0
Direction
maximizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculated legumes maximized the uptake of macronutrients in shoots, roots and whole plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1456 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation significantly (P£0.001) increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–752 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Lablab purpureus (hyacinth bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 40 positive, 4 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

cultivation system · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.