Abstract
Field experiment was conducted under open field and net-covered greenhouse at El-Qanater Research Station Farm in Qalubiya Governorate to investigate the effect of different types of bio fertilizers, compost and NPK on growth and yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). The population fluctuation of aphid, and white fly, attacking common bean were studied. The obtained results indicated that the maximum air temperature was decreased, but minimum air temperature and the relative humidity % were increased under net-covered greenhouse compared with open field. The growth parameters were increased under net-covered greenhouse compare to open field. NPK content of leaves as well as yield and its components were increased compared with open field conditions. The statistical analysis of the obtained data revealed that there were significant differences in white fly and aphid stages among most of the tested treatments under field conditions and green house. The highest infestation by whitefly and aphids were recorded at NPK treatment, while the lowest were recorded at B.t ½NPK + Nitrobein, under field conditions. The highest reduction percentages of whitefly and aphid populations were recorded in the treatments of B.t, followed by the treatments of half recommended rate of NPK + Nitrobein and half recommended rate NPK + Phosphoren. On the other hand, the lowest reduction percentages were recorded in treatments of one recommended rate of NPK and compost under open field and green house conditions of the first and second seasons.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Net-covered greenhouse air had lower maximum temperature than open field air.
- Taxon
- common bean
Phaseolus vulgarise1 - Outcome
- maximum air temperaturee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- open fielde0
- Setting
- net-covered greenhousee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum air temperature was decreased, but minimum air temperature and the relative humidity % were increased under net-covered greenhouse compared with open field”
e1“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Net-covered greenhouse air had higher minimum temperature and relative humidity than open field air.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
- Outcome
- minimum air temperature and the relative humidity %e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- open fielde0
- Setting
- net-covered greenhousee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“minimum air temperature and the relative humidity % were increased under net-covered greenhouse compared with open field”
e1“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Common bean growth parameters increased under net-covered greenhouse relative to open field.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
- Treatment
- net-covered greenhousee0
- Outcome
- growth parameterse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- open fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The growth parameters were increased under net-covered greenhouse compare to open field”
e1“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Common bean leaf NPK content increased under net cover relative to open field.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise2
- Treatment
- net-covered greenhousee1
- Outcome
- NPK content of leavese0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- open field conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NPK content of leaves as well as yield and its components were increased compared with open field conditions”
e1“The growth parameters were increased under net-covered greenhouse”
e2“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Common bean yield and components increased under net cover relative to open field.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise2
- Treatment
- net-covered greenhousee1
- Outcome
- yield and its componentse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- open field conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NPK content of leaves as well as yield and its components were increased compared with open field conditions”
e1“The growth parameters were increased under net-covered greenhouse”
e2“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Whitefly stages differed significantly among most treatments under field and greenhouse conditions.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
- Interactor
- white flye0pest
- Outcome
- white fly and aphid stagese0
- Setting
- field conditions and green housee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significant differences in white fly and aphid stages among most of the tested treatments under field conditions and green house”
e1“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Aphid stages differed significantly among most treatments under field and greenhouse conditions.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
- Interactor
- aphide0pest
- Outcome
- aphid stagese0
- Setting
- field conditions and green housee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significant differences in white fly and aphid stages among most of the tested treatments under field conditions and green house”
e1“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Whitefly infestation was lowest with B.t ½NPK + Nitrobein in the field.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise2
- Treatment
- B.t ½NPK + Nitrobeine0
- Interactor
- whiteflye1pest
- Outcome
- infestation by whiteflye1
- Direction
- loweste0
- Setting
- field conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lowest were recorded at B.t ½NPK + Nitrobein, under field conditions”
e1“highest infestation by whitefly and aphids”
e2“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Aphid infestation was lowest with B.t ½NPK + Nitrobein in the field.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise2
- Treatment
- B.t ½NPK + Nitrobeine0
- Interactor
- aphidsAphidomorphae1pest
- Outcome
- infestation by whitefly and aphidse1
- Direction
- loweste0
- Setting
- field conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lowest were recorded at B.t ½NPK + Nitrobein, under field conditions”
e1“highest infestation by whitefly and aphids”
e2“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
B.t gave the highest whitefly population reduction.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
- Treatment
- B.te0
- Interactor
- whiteflye0pest
- Outcome
- reduction percentages of whiteflye0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest reduction percentages of whitefly and aphid populations were recorded in the treatments of B.t”
e1“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
B.t gave the highest aphid population reduction.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
- Treatment
- B.te0
- Interactor
- aphide0pest
- Outcome
- reduction percentages of whitefly and aphid populationse0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest reduction percentages of whitefly and aphid populations were recorded in the treatments of B.t”
e1“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Half-rate NPK plus Nitrobein followed B.t for whitefly and aphid reduction.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise2
- Treatment
- half recommended rate of NPK + Nitrobeine0
- Interactor
- whiteflye1pest
- Outcome
- reduction percentages of whitefly and aphid populationse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by the treatments of half recommended rate of NPK + Nitrobein”
e1“reduction percentages of whitefly and aphid populations”
e2“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Half-rate NPK plus Phosphoren followed B.t for whitefly and aphid reduction.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise2
- Treatment
- half recommended rate NPK + Phosphorene0
- Interactor
- whiteflye1pest
- Outcome
- reduction percentages of whitefly and aphid populationse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“half recommended rate NPK + Phosphoren”
e1“reduction percentages of whitefly and aphid populations”
e2“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Recommended-rate NPK gave among the lowest whitefly and aphid reduction percentages.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise2
- Treatment
- one recommended rate of NPKe0
- Interactor
- whiteflye1pest
- Outcome
- reduction percentagese0
- Direction
- loweste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lowest reduction percentages were recorded in treatments of one recommended rate of NPK and compost under open field and green house conditions of the first and second seasons”
e1“whitefly and aphid populations”
e2“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost gave among the lowest whitefly and aphid reduction percentages.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise2
- Treatment
- composte0
- Interactor
- whiteflye1pest
- Outcome
- reduction percentagese0
- Direction
- loweste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lowest reduction percentages were recorded in treatments of one recommended rate of NPK and compost under open field and green house conditions of the first and second seasons”
e1“whitefly and aphid populations”
e2“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
The same questions in other papers
trap barrier · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →cultivation system · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →cultivation system · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
trap barrier · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
cultivation system · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.