Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Piri inoculation increased root nitrogen uptake by 187% compared with non-inoculated plants.

A claim from Potential Piriformospora indica effect on growth and mineral nutrition of Phaseolus vulgaris crop under low phosphorus intake · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Piri inoculation increased root nitrogen uptake by 187% compared with non-inoculated plants.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
inoculation with Pirie0
Interactor
Pirie0symbiont
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
187%e0
Comparator
non-inoculated plantse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizae inoculation increased significantly nitrogen and phosphorus uptake that the inoculation with Piri increased N uptake in roots by 187% and P uptake by 200% compared to the non-inoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1222
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–92

Title

Potential Piriformospora indica effect on growth and mineral nutrition of Phaseolus vulgaris crop under low phosphorus intake

Hayet Beltayef; Mongi Melki; Wafa Saidi; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2020. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1845366

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-899ff9a225f0ef99199a38e4636e9c4e922868a3b8306bfbd776e27e259e0c60 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

inoculation · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 40 positive, 4 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.