Abstract
Cultivation techniques of fodder maize during recent years have led to a shift in the composition of weed populations. This would necessitate the integration of new, efficient herbicides in the control of primary weeds in maize crop. Hence, a field trial was carried out at Livestock Farm Complex, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Namakkal during kharif season 2022 to determine the most suitable weed management method to control the diverse weed species in fodder maize. The experiment was carried out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with seven treatments replicated thrice. Data was collected on weed parameters and yield of fodder maize. The experimental field was infested with Trianthema portulacastrum, Cleome gynandra, Boerhaavia diffusa, Digera arvensis and Cyanotis axillaris. Among the grassy weeds, Cynodon dactylon and Dactyloctenium aegyptium were the dominant weed species.The results of this study indicated that application of Atrazine 1.0 kg ha-1 followed by (fb) hand weeding can effectively control the diverse weed population in fodder maize fields, resulting in higher green fodder yield of 41.1 t ha-1.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
The field contained five named broadleaf weeds.
- Taxon
- fodder maizet0
- Interactor
- Trianthema portulacastrum
Trianthema portulacastrume0weed - Outcome
- infestede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The experimental field was infested with Trianthema portulacastrum, Cleome gynandra, Boerhaavia diffusa, Digera arvensis and Cyanotis axillaris.”
t0“fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cynodon dactylon and Dactyloctenium aegyptium were dominant grassy weeds.
- Taxon
- fodder maizet0
- Interactor
- Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylone0weed - Outcome
- dominant weed speciese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Among the grassy weeds, Cynodon dactylon and Dactyloctenium aegyptium were the dominant weed species.”
t0“fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Atrazine followed by hand weeding controlled diverse weeds.
- Taxon
- fodder maizet0
- Treatment
- Atrazine 1.0 kg ha-1 followed by (fb) hand weedinge0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- diverse weed populatione0
- Direction
- controle0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“application of Atrazine 1.0 kg ha-1 followed by (fb) hand weeding can effectively control the diverse weed population in fodder maize fields”
t0“fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Atrazine followed by hand weeding gave a higher green fodder yield of 41.1 t ha-1.
- Taxon
- fodder maizet0
- Treatment
- Atrazine 1.0 kg ha-1 followed by (fb) hand weedinge0
- Outcome
- green fodder yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 41.1 t ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“application of Atrazine 1.0 kg ha-1 followed by (fb) hand weeding can effectively control the diverse weed population in fodder maize fields, resulting in higher green fodder yield of 41.1 t ha-1”
t0“fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
The same questions in other papers
atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
236 papers more in this group
See all 240 papers →herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
647 papers more in this group
See all 651 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.