Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of different weed control methods on weed dynamics and yield of fodder maize (Zea mays L.)

C Nithya; S Ramakrishnan; P Thirunavukkarasu; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Cultivation techniques of fodder maize during recent years have led to a shift in the composition of weed populations. This would necessitate the integration of new, efficient herbicides in the control of primary weeds in maize crop. Hence, a field trial was carried out at Livestock Farm Complex, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Namakkal during kharif season 2022 to determine the most suitable weed management method to control the diverse weed species in fodder maize. The experiment was carried out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with seven treatments replicated thrice. Data was collected on weed parameters and yield of fodder maize. The experimental field was infested with Trianthema portulacastrum, Cleome gynandra, Boerhaavia diffusa, Digera arvensis and Cyanotis axillaris. Among the grassy weeds, Cynodon dactylon and Dactyloctenium aegyptium were the dominant weed species.The results of this study indicated that application of Atrazine 1.0 kg ha-1 followed by (fb) hand weeding can effectively control the diverse weed population in fodder maize fields, resulting in higher green fodder yield of 41.1 t ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The field contained five named broadleaf weeds.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Interactor
Trianthema portulacastrumTrianthema portulacastrume0weed
Outcome
infestede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trianthema portulacastrum
Trianthema portulacastrum · InteractorGraham Racher · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experimental field was infested with Trianthema portulacastrum, Cleome gynandra, Boerhaavia diffusa, Digera arvensis and Cyanotis axillaris.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cynodon dactylon and Dactyloctenium aegyptium were dominant grassy weeds.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Interactor
Cynodon dactylonCynodon dactylone0weed
Outcome
dominant weed speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · InteractorRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the grassy weeds, Cynodon dactylon and Dactyloctenium aegyptium were the dominant weed species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine followed by hand weeding controlled diverse weeds.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Treatment
Atrazine 1.0 kg ha-1 followed by (fb) hand weedinge0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
diverse weed populatione0
Direction
controle0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of Atrazine 1.0 kg ha-1 followed by (fb) hand weeding can effectively control the diverse weed population in fodder maize fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine followed by hand weeding gave a higher green fodder yield of 41.1 t ha-1.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Treatment
Atrazine 1.0 kg ha-1 followed by (fb) hand weedinge0
Outcome
green fodder yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
41.1 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of Atrazine 1.0 kg ha-1 followed by (fb) hand weeding can effectively control the diverse weed population in fodder maize fields, resulting in higher green fodder yield of 41.1 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–97 · show in text ↑

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.