Paper · 2024 · Asian Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition

Evaluation of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L. var PDM 139) Cultivated and Harvested Soils Supplemented with Nano Urea, Rhizobium and Farm Yard Manure

Jagdish Saran; Arun Alfred David; Tarence Thomas; et al.

12
claims
48
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A study was conducted to investigate the “Evaluation of varying levels of Nano urea, FYM, and rhizobium on soil properties and yield characteristics of green gram (Vigna radiata. L) var. PDM 139” at the research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistry. The experiment followed a randomized block design (RBD) with three replications. Treatment T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) showed a slight decrease in pH (6.96 PH), bulk density (1.27 mg m-3), particle density (2.46 mg m-3), there was a significant increase in pore space (48.90%), water holding capacity (46.51%), EC (0.20 ds m-3), organic carbon (0.58%), available nitrogen (320 kg ha-1), phosphorus (21.4 kg ha-1), potassium (195.12 kg ha-1), and plant growth. Among all the treatment joint use of T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) showed the most significant impact on green gram growth through healthy soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) showed a slight decrease in soil pH (6.96) in green gram cultivation

Material
PDM 139t0
Treatment
T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%)e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
pHe1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
6.96 PHe1
Setting
research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistrye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L. var PDM 139)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–55 · show in text ↑
t1

“Nano Urea, Rhizobium and Farm Yard Manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–146 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) showed a slight decrease in pH (6.96 PH), bulk density (1.27 mg m-3), particle density (2.46 mg m-3), there was a significant increase in pore space (48.90%), water holding capacity (46.51%), EC (0.20 ds m-3), organic carbon (0.58%), available nitrogen (320 kg ha-1), phosphorus (21.4 kg ha-1), potassium (195.12 kg ha-1), and plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–734 · show in text ↑
e2

“at the research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) showed a slight decrease in soil bulk density (1.27 mg m-3) in green gram cultivation

Material
PDM 139t0
Treatment
T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%)e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
bulk densitye1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
1.27 mg m-3e1
Setting
research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistrye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L. var PDM 139)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–55 · show in text ↑
t1

“Nano Urea, Rhizobium and Farm Yard Manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–146 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) showed a slight decrease in pH (6.96 PH), bulk density (1.27 mg m-3), particle density (2.46 mg m-3), there was a significant increase in pore space (48.90%), water holding capacity (46.51%), EC (0.20 ds m-3), organic carbon (0.58%), available nitrogen (320 kg ha-1), phosphorus (21.4 kg ha-1), potassium (195.12 kg ha-1), and plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–734 · show in text ↑
e2

“at the research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) showed a slight decrease in soil particle density (2.46 mg m-3) in green gram cultivation

Material
PDM 139t0
Treatment
T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%)e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
particle densitye1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
2.46 mg m-3e1
Setting
research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistrye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L. var PDM 139)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–55 · show in text ↑
t1

“Nano Urea, Rhizobium and Farm Yard Manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–146 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) showed a slight decrease in pH (6.96 PH), bulk density (1.27 mg m-3), particle density (2.46 mg m-3), there was a significant increase in pore space (48.90%), water holding capacity (46.51%), EC (0.20 ds m-3), organic carbon (0.58%), available nitrogen (320 kg ha-1), phosphorus (21.4 kg ha-1), potassium (195.12 kg ha-1), and plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–734 · show in text ↑
e2

“at the research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) significantly increased soil pore space (48.90%) in green gram cultivation

Material
PDM 139t0
Treatment
T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%)e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
pore spacee1
Direction
increasee1
Value
48.90%e1
Setting
research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistrye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L. var PDM 139)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–55 · show in text ↑
t1

“Nano Urea, Rhizobium and Farm Yard Manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–146 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) showed a slight decrease in pH (6.96 PH), bulk density (1.27 mg m-3), particle density (2.46 mg m-3), there was a significant increase in pore space (48.90%), water holding capacity (46.51%), EC (0.20 ds m-3), organic carbon (0.58%), available nitrogen (320 kg ha-1), phosphorus (21.4 kg ha-1), potassium (195.12 kg ha-1), and plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–734 · show in text ↑
e2

“at the research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) significantly increased soil water holding capacity (46.51%) in green gram cultivation

Material
PDM 139t0
Treatment
T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%)e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
water holding capacitye1
Direction
increasee1
Value
46.51%e1
Setting
research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistrye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L. var PDM 139)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–55 · show in text ↑
t1

“Nano Urea, Rhizobium and Farm Yard Manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–146 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) showed a slight decrease in pH (6.96 PH), bulk density (1.27 mg m-3), particle density (2.46 mg m-3), there was a significant increase in pore space (48.90%), water holding capacity (46.51%), EC (0.20 ds m-3), organic carbon (0.58%), available nitrogen (320 kg ha-1), phosphorus (21.4 kg ha-1), potassium (195.12 kg ha-1), and plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–734 · show in text ↑
e2

“at the research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) significantly increased soil EC (0.20 ds m-3) in green gram cultivation

Material
PDM 139t0
Treatment
T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%)e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
ECe1
Direction
increasee1
Value
0.20 ds m-3e1
Setting
research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistrye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L. var PDM 139)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–55 · show in text ↑
t1

“Nano Urea, Rhizobium and Farm Yard Manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–146 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) showed a slight decrease in pH (6.96 PH), bulk density (1.27 mg m-3), particle density (2.46 mg m-3), there was a significant increase in pore space (48.90%), water holding capacity (46.51%), EC (0.20 ds m-3), organic carbon (0.58%), available nitrogen (320 kg ha-1), phosphorus (21.4 kg ha-1), potassium (195.12 kg ha-1), and plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–734 · show in text ↑
e2

“at the research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) significantly increased soil organic carbon (0.58%) in green gram cultivation

Material
PDM 139t0
Treatment
T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%)e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
organic carbone1
Direction
increasee1
Value
0.58%e1
Setting
research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistrye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L. var PDM 139)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–55 · show in text ↑
t1

“Nano Urea, Rhizobium and Farm Yard Manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–146 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) showed a slight decrease in pH (6.96 PH), bulk density (1.27 mg m-3), particle density (2.46 mg m-3), there was a significant increase in pore space (48.90%), water holding capacity (46.51%), EC (0.20 ds m-3), organic carbon (0.58%), available nitrogen (320 kg ha-1), phosphorus (21.4 kg ha-1), potassium (195.12 kg ha-1), and plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–734 · show in text ↑
e2

“at the research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) significantly increased available nitrogen (320 kg ha-1) in green gram cultivation

Material
PDM 139t0
Treatment
T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%)e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
available nitrogene1
Direction
increasee1
Value
320 kg ha-1e1
Setting
research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistrye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L. var PDM 139)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–55 · show in text ↑
t1

“Nano Urea, Rhizobium and Farm Yard Manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–146 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) showed a slight decrease in pH (6.96 PH), bulk density (1.27 mg m-3), particle density (2.46 mg m-3), there was a significant increase in pore space (48.90%), water holding capacity (46.51%), EC (0.20 ds m-3), organic carbon (0.58%), available nitrogen (320 kg ha-1), phosphorus (21.4 kg ha-1), potassium (195.12 kg ha-1), and plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–734 · show in text ↑
e2

“at the research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) significantly increased available phosphorus (21.4 kg ha-1) in green gram cultivation

Material
PDM 139t0
Treatment
T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%)e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
phosphoruse1
Direction
increasee1
Value
21.4 kg ha-1e1
Setting
research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistrye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L. var PDM 139)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–55 · show in text ↑
t1

“Nano Urea, Rhizobium and Farm Yard Manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–146 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) showed a slight decrease in pH (6.96 PH), bulk density (1.27 mg m-3), particle density (2.46 mg m-3), there was a significant increase in pore space (48.90%), water holding capacity (46.51%), EC (0.20 ds m-3), organic carbon (0.58%), available nitrogen (320 kg ha-1), phosphorus (21.4 kg ha-1), potassium (195.12 kg ha-1), and plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–734 · show in text ↑
e2

“at the research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) significantly increased available potassium (195.12 kg ha-1) in green gram cultivation

Material
PDM 139t0
Treatment
T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%)e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
potassiume1
Direction
increasee1
Value
195.12 kg ha-1e1
Setting
research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistrye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L. var PDM 139)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–55 · show in text ↑
t1

“Nano Urea, Rhizobium and Farm Yard Manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–146 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) showed a slight decrease in pH (6.96 PH), bulk density (1.27 mg m-3), particle density (2.46 mg m-3), there was a significant increase in pore space (48.90%), water holding capacity (46.51%), EC (0.20 ds m-3), organic carbon (0.58%), available nitrogen (320 kg ha-1), phosphorus (21.4 kg ha-1), potassium (195.12 kg ha-1), and plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–734 · show in text ↑
e2

“at the research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) significantly increased plant growth of green gram

Material
PDM 139t0
Treatment
T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%)e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe1
Direction
increasee1
Setting
research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistrye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L. var PDM 139)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–55 · show in text ↑
t1

“Nano Urea, Rhizobium and Farm Yard Manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–146 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) showed a slight decrease in pH (6.96 PH), bulk density (1.27 mg m-3), particle density (2.46 mg m-3), there was a significant increase in pore space (48.90%), water holding capacity (46.51%), EC (0.20 ds m-3), organic carbon (0.58%), available nitrogen (320 kg ha-1), phosphorus (21.4 kg ha-1), potassium (195.12 kg ha-1), and plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–734 · show in text ↑
e2

“at the research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) had the most significant impact on green gram growth among all treatments

Material
PDM 139t0
Treatment
T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%)e3
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
green gram growthe3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Comparator
all the treatmente3
Setting
research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistrye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L. var PDM 139)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–55 · show in text ↑
t1

“Nano Urea, Rhizobium and Farm Yard Manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–146 · show in text ↑
e2

“at the research farm of soil science and agricultural chemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–259 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among all the treatment joint use of T9 (NU at 100% + RZ at 100% + FYM at 100%) showed the most significant impact on green gram growth through healthy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–892 · show in text ↑

fertilization · Rhizobium · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.