Abstract
The field trial was conducted at Central Research Field, Department of Entomology, Naini Agricultural Institute, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj during kharif season 2023.The experiment was laid out in in Randomised Block Design (RBD) with eight treatments each replicated thrice using variety Kashi Chaman. The treatments viz., T1 Beauveria bassiana 1.5% T2 Spinosad 45%SC T3 Neem seed kernel extract 10%WP T4 Emamectin Benzoate 5SG T5 Fipronil 5SC T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC T7 Azadirachtin 0.03%WSP 300PPM (5ml/lit) and along with untreated control T0 against Earias vittella in okra. The data on percentage of shoot and fruit infestation of okra shoot and fruit borer first and second spray mean revealed that all treatments are significantly superior over control. Among all the treatments lowest per cent shoot and fruit, infestation was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (8.46) (9.44),, T2 Spinosad 45% SC (9.95) (10.44),, T4 Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (11.83) (11.85),, T5 Fipronil 5%SC (12.96) (12.91),, T3 Neem seed kernel extract 10% WP (14.82) (13.27), T1 Beauveria bassiana 1.5% (15.94) (14.62) and T7 Azadirachtin 0.03%WSP 300PPM (5ml/lit) (16.97) (14.79) and is significantly superior over the control (23.78) (23.26). While The highest yield was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (210.2q/ha),as well as B:C ratio (1:6.54), T2 Spinosad 45%SC (195.7q/ha) (1:6.02),, T4 Emamectin benzoate 5SG (163.4q/ha) (1:5.17), T5 Fipronil 5SC(149.2q/ha) (1:4.69), T3 Neem seed kernel extract10%WP (138.4q/ha) (1:4.42),, T1 Beauveria bassiana 1.5% (131.7q/ha) (1:4.00), T7 Azadirachtin 0.03%WSP 300PPM (5ml/lit) (120.2q/ha) (1:3.71), as compared to T0 control (90.2q/ha) (1:2.96).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC gave the lowest shoot and fruit infestation of okra (8.46 %), relative to control.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SCe2
- Interactor
- Earias vittella
Earias vittellat0pest - Outcome
- per cent shoot and fruit, infestatione2
- Direction
- loweste2
- Value
- 8.46e2
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e2“lowest per cent shoot and fruit, infestation was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (8.46) (9.44)”
e1“significantly superior over the control (23.78) (23.26)”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad 45%SC lowered shoot and fruit infestation of okra compared with control.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- T2 Spinosad 45% SCe6
- Interactor
- Earias vittella
Earias vittellat0pest - Outcome
- shoot and fruit infestatione0
- Direction
- lowerinferrede6
- Value
- 9.95e6
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e6“T2 Spinosad 45% SC (9.95) (10.44)”
e0“The data on percentage of shoot and fruit infestation of okra shoot and fruit borer first and second spray mean revealed that all treatments are significantly superior over control”
e1“significantly superior over the control (23.78) (23.26)”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Beauveria bassiana 1.5% lowered shoot and fruit infestation of okra compared with control.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- T1 Beauveria bassiana 1.5%e6
- Interactor
- Earias vittella
Earias vittellat0pest - Second interactor
- Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassianae6biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- shoot and fruit infestatione0
- Direction
- lowerinferrede6
- Value
- 15.94e6
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=500)

Verbatim
e6“T1 Beauveria bassiana 1.5% (15.94) (14.62)”
e0“The data on percentage of shoot and fruit infestation of okra shoot and fruit borer first and second spray mean revealed that all treatments are significantly superior over control”
e1“significantly superior over the control (23.78) (23.26)”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem seed kernel extract 10% WP lowered shoot and fruit infestation of okra compared with control.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- T3 Neem seed kernel extract 10% WPe6
- Interactor
- Earias vittella
Earias vittellat0pest - Outcome
- shoot and fruit infestatione0
- Direction
- lowerinferrede6
- Value
- 14.82e6
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e6“T3 Neem seed kernel extract 10% WP (14.82) (13.27)”
e0“The data on percentage of shoot and fruit infestation of okra shoot and fruit borer first and second spray mean revealed that all treatments are significantly superior over control”
e1“significantly superior over the control (23.78) (23.26)”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate 5%SG lowered shoot and fruit infestation of okra compared with control.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- T4 Emamectin benzoate 5%SGe6
- Interactor
- Earias vittella
Earias vittellat0pest - Outcome
- shoot and fruit infestatione0
- Direction
- lowerinferrede6
- Value
- 11.83e6
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e6“T4 Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (11.83) (11.85)”
e0“The data on percentage of shoot and fruit infestation of okra shoot and fruit borer first and second spray mean revealed that all treatments are significantly superior over control”
e1“significantly superior over the control (23.78) (23.26)”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Fipronil 5%SC lowered shoot and fruit infestation of okra compared with control.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- T5 Fipronil 5%SCe6
- Interactor
- Earias vittella
Earias vittellat0pest - Outcome
- shoot and fruit infestatione0
- Direction
- lowerinferrede6
- Value
- 12.96e6
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e6“T5 Fipronil 5%SC (12.96) (12.91)”
e0“The data on percentage of shoot and fruit infestation of okra shoot and fruit borer first and second spray mean revealed that all treatments are significantly superior over control”
e1“significantly superior over the control (23.78) (23.26)”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Azadirachtin 0.03%WSP lowered shoot and fruit infestation of okra compared with control.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- T7 Azadirachtin 0.03%WSP 300PPM (5ml/lit)e6
- Interactor
- Earias vittella
Earias vittellat0pest - Outcome
- shoot and fruit infestatione0
- Direction
- lowerinferrede6
- Value
- 16.97e6
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e6“T7 Azadirachtin 0.03%WSP 300PPM (5ml/lit) (16.97) (14.79)”
e0“The data on percentage of shoot and fruit infestation of okra shoot and fruit borer first and second spray mean revealed that all treatments are significantly superior over control”
e1“significantly superior over the control (23.78) (23.26)”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad 45%SC gave a higher okra yield than control (195.7 q/ha).
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- T2 Spinosad 45%SCe6
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- higherinferrede6
- Value
- 195.7q/hae6
- Comparator
- T0 controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e6“T2 Spinosad 45%SC (195.7q/ha)”
e3“The highest yield was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (210.2q/ha)”
e5“as compared to T0 control (90.2q/ha)”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate 5SG gave a higher okra yield than control (163.4 q/ha).
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- T4 Emamectin benzoate 5SGe6
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- higherinferrede6
- Value
- 163.4q/hae6
- Comparator
- T0 controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e6“T4 Emamectin benzoate 5SG (163.4q/ha)”
e3“The highest yield was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (210.2q/ha)”
e5“as compared to T0 control (90.2q/ha)”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Fipronil 5SC gave a higher okra yield than control (149.2 q/ha).
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- T5 Fipronil 5SCe6
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- higherinferrede6
- Value
- 149.2q/hae6
- Comparator
- T0 controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e6“T5 Fipronil 5SC(149.2q/ha)”
e3“The highest yield was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (210.2q/ha)”
e5“as compared to T0 control (90.2q/ha)”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem seed kernel extract 10% WP gave a higher okra yield than control (138.4 q/ha).
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- T3 Neem seed kernel extract10%WPe6
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- higherinferrede6
- Value
- 138.4q/hae6
- Comparator
- T0 controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e6“T3 Neem seed kernel extract10%WP (138.4q/ha)”
e3“The highest yield was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (210.2q/ha)”
e5“as compared to T0 control (90.2q/ha)”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Beauveria bassiana 1.5% gave a higher okra yield than control (131.7 q/ha).
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- T1 Beauveria bassiana 1.5%e6
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- higherinferrede6
- Value
- 131.7q/hae6
- Comparator
- T0 controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e6“T1 Beauveria bassiana 1.5% (131.7q/ha)”
e3“The highest yield was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (210.2q/ha)”
e5“as compared to T0 control (90.2q/ha)”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Azadirachtin 0.03%WSP 300PPM gave a higher okra yield than control (120.2 q/ha).
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- T7 Azadirachtin 0.03%WSP 300PPM (5ml/lit)e6
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- higherinferrede6
- Value
- 120.2q/hae6
- Comparator
- T0 controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e6“T7 Azadirachtin 0.03%WSP 300PPM (5ml/lit) (120.2q/ha)”
e3“The highest yield was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (210.2q/ha)”
e5“as compared to T0 control (90.2q/ha)”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC gave the highest okra yield (210.2 q/ha).
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SCe3
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 210.2q/hae3
- Comparator
- T0 controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e3“The highest yield was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (210.2q/ha)”
e5“as compared to T0 control (90.2q/ha)”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC gave the highest benefit-cost ratio in okra (1:6.54).
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SCe3
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe4
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 1:6.54e4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e3“The highest yield was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (210.2q/ha)”
e4“as well as B:C ratio (1:6.54)”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”
The same questions in other papers
chlorantraniliprole · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Azadirachta indica · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Beauveria bassiana · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Beauveria bassiana · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
azadirachtin · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
azadirachtin · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →fipronil · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →fipronil · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.