Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Field Efficacy and Economics of Selected Biopesticides and Chemicals against Shoot and Fruit Borer, Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra

Narishetti Saichand; Ashwani Kumar

15
claims
57
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field trial was conducted at Central Research Field, Department of Entomology, Naini Agricultural Institute, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj during kharif season 2023.The experiment was laid out in in Randomised Block Design (RBD) with eight treatments each replicated thrice using variety Kashi Chaman. The treatments viz., T1 Beauveria bassiana 1.5% T2 Spinosad 45%SC T3 Neem seed kernel extract 10%WP T4 Emamectin Benzoate 5SG T5 Fipronil 5SC T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC T7 Azadirachtin 0.03%WSP 300PPM (5ml/lit) and along with untreated control T0 against Earias vittella in okra. The data on percentage of shoot and fruit infestation of okra shoot and fruit borer first and second spray mean revealed that all treatments are significantly superior over control. Among all the treatments lowest per cent shoot and fruit, infestation was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (8.46) (9.44),, T2 Spinosad 45% SC (9.95) (10.44),, T4 Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (11.83) (11.85),, T5 Fipronil 5%SC (12.96) (12.91),, T3 Neem seed kernel extract 10% WP (14.82) (13.27), T1 Beauveria bassiana 1.5% (15.94) (14.62) and T7 Azadirachtin 0.03%WSP 300PPM (5ml/lit) (16.97) (14.79) and is significantly superior over the control (23.78) (23.26). While The highest yield was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (210.2q/ha),as well as B:C ratio (1:6.54), T2 Spinosad 45%SC (195.7q/ha) (1:6.02),, T4 Emamectin benzoate 5SG (163.4q/ha) (1:5.17), T5 Fipronil 5SC(149.2q/ha) (1:4.69), T3 Neem seed kernel extract10%WP (138.4q/ha) (1:4.42),, T1 Beauveria bassiana 1.5% (131.7q/ha) (1:4.00), T7 Azadirachtin 0.03%WSP 300PPM (5ml/lit) (120.2q/ha) (1:3.71), as compared to T0 control (90.2q/ha) (1:2.96).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC gave the lowest shoot and fruit infestation of okra (8.46 %), relative to control.

Treatment
T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SCe2
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Outcome
per cent shoot and fruit, infestatione2
Direction
loweste2
Value
8.46e2
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“lowest per cent shoot and fruit, infestation was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (8.46) (9.44)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–949 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly superior over the control (23.78) (23.26)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 45%SC lowered shoot and fruit infestation of okra compared with control.

Treatment
T2 Spinosad 45% SCe6
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Outcome
shoot and fruit infestatione0
Direction
lowerinferrede6
Value
9.95e6
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“T2 Spinosad 45% SC (9.95) (10.44)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–985 · show in text ↑
e0

“The data on percentage of shoot and fruit infestation of okra shoot and fruit borer first and second spray mean revealed that all treatments are significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–818 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly superior over the control (23.78) (23.26)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beauveria bassiana 1.5% lowered shoot and fruit infestation of okra compared with control.

Treatment
T1 Beauveria bassiana 1.5%e6
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Second interactor
Beauveria bassianaBeauveria bassianae6biocontrol_agent
Outcome
shoot and fruit infestatione0
Direction
lowerinferrede6
Value
15.94e6
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · Second interactorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“T1 Beauveria bassiana 1.5% (15.94) (14.62)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1162 · show in text ↑
e0

“The data on percentage of shoot and fruit infestation of okra shoot and fruit borer first and second spray mean revealed that all treatments are significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–818 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly superior over the control (23.78) (23.26)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem seed kernel extract 10% WP lowered shoot and fruit infestation of okra compared with control.

Treatment
T3 Neem seed kernel extract 10% WPe6
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Outcome
shoot and fruit infestatione0
Direction
lowerinferrede6
Value
14.82e6
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“T3 Neem seed kernel extract 10% WP (14.82) (13.27)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1118 · show in text ↑
e0

“The data on percentage of shoot and fruit infestation of okra shoot and fruit borer first and second spray mean revealed that all treatments are significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–818 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly superior over the control (23.78) (23.26)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate 5%SG lowered shoot and fruit infestation of okra compared with control.

Treatment
T4 Emamectin benzoate 5%SGe6
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Outcome
shoot and fruit infestatione0
Direction
lowerinferrede6
Value
11.83e6
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“T4 Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (11.83) (11.85)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1030 · show in text ↑
e0

“The data on percentage of shoot and fruit infestation of okra shoot and fruit borer first and second spray mean revealed that all treatments are significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–818 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly superior over the control (23.78) (23.26)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fipronil 5%SC lowered shoot and fruit infestation of okra compared with control.

Treatment
T5 Fipronil 5%SCe6
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Outcome
shoot and fruit infestatione0
Direction
lowerinferrede6
Value
12.96e6
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“T5 Fipronil 5%SC (12.96) (12.91)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1065 · show in text ↑
e0

“The data on percentage of shoot and fruit infestation of okra shoot and fruit borer first and second spray mean revealed that all treatments are significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–818 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly superior over the control (23.78) (23.26)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin 0.03%WSP lowered shoot and fruit infestation of okra compared with control.

Treatment
T7 Azadirachtin 0.03%WSP 300PPM (5ml/lit)e6
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
Outcome
shoot and fruit infestatione0
Direction
lowerinferrede6
Value
16.97e6
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“T7 Azadirachtin 0.03%WSP 300PPM (5ml/lit) (16.97) (14.79)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1224 · show in text ↑
e0

“The data on percentage of shoot and fruit infestation of okra shoot and fruit borer first and second spray mean revealed that all treatments are significantly superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–818 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly superior over the control (23.78) (23.26)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 45%SC gave a higher okra yield than control (195.7 q/ha).

Treatment
T2 Spinosad 45%SCe6
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
higherinferrede6
Value
195.7q/hae6
Comparator
T0 controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“T2 Spinosad 45%SC (195.7q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1431 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest yield was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (210.2q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1370 · show in text ↑
e5

“as compared to T0 control (90.2q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate 5SG gave a higher okra yield than control (163.4 q/ha).

Treatment
T4 Emamectin benzoate 5SGe6
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
higherinferrede6
Value
163.4q/hae6
Comparator
T0 controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“T4 Emamectin benzoate 5SG (163.4q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1480 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest yield was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (210.2q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1370 · show in text ↑
e5

“as compared to T0 control (90.2q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fipronil 5SC gave a higher okra yield than control (149.2 q/ha).

Treatment
T5 Fipronil 5SCe6
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
higherinferrede6
Value
149.2q/hae6
Comparator
T0 controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“T5 Fipronil 5SC(149.2q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1517 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest yield was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (210.2q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1370 · show in text ↑
e5

“as compared to T0 control (90.2q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem seed kernel extract 10% WP gave a higher okra yield than control (138.4 q/ha).

Treatment
T3 Neem seed kernel extract10%WPe6
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
higherinferrede6
Value
138.4q/hae6
Comparator
T0 controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“T3 Neem seed kernel extract10%WP (138.4q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1572 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest yield was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (210.2q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1370 · show in text ↑
e5

“as compared to T0 control (90.2q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beauveria bassiana 1.5% gave a higher okra yield than control (131.7 q/ha).

Treatment
T1 Beauveria bassiana 1.5%e6
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
higherinferrede6
Value
131.7q/hae6
Comparator
T0 controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“T1 Beauveria bassiana 1.5% (131.7q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1622 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest yield was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (210.2q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1370 · show in text ↑
e5

“as compared to T0 control (90.2q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin 0.03%WSP 300PPM gave a higher okra yield than control (120.2 q/ha).

Treatment
T7 Azadirachtin 0.03%WSP 300PPM (5ml/lit)e6
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
higherinferrede6
Value
120.2q/hae6
Comparator
T0 controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“T7 Azadirachtin 0.03%WSP 300PPM (5ml/lit) (120.2q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1686 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest yield was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (210.2q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1370 · show in text ↑
e5

“as compared to T0 control (90.2q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC gave the highest okra yield (210.2 q/ha).

Treatment
T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SCe3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Value
210.2q/hae3
Comparator
T0 controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The highest yield was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (210.2q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1370 · show in text ↑
e5

“as compared to T0 control (90.2q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC gave the highest benefit-cost ratio in okra (1:6.54).

Treatment
T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SCe3
Outcome
B:C ratioe4
Direction
higheste3
Value
1:6.54e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The highest yield was recorded in T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC (210.2q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1370 · show in text ↑
e4

“as well as B:C ratio (1:6.54)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1400 · show in text ↑
t0

“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑

chlorantraniliprole · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Fruit yield under chlorantraniliprole was at par with pyridalyl and emamectin treatments.

    Efficacy of Biorational Insecticides Against Spotted Boll Worm Earias spp. in Okra · 2021 · compared with pyridalyl 10EC (500 and 625 ml/ ha) and emamectin benzoate (175 g/ ha)

    No difference from an alternative

  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Azadirachta indica · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Beauveria bassiana · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Beauveria bassiana · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

azadirachtin · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

azadirachtin · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fipronil · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fipronil · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.