Abstract
The present investigation was conducted during July to November 2018 at Central Research Farm, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj. The occurrence of shoot and fruit borer commenced from August third week with an average population of 2.69% infestation. The shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella population increased and gradually reached its peak level of infestation 48.61% in October second week there after declined trend was observed as temperature decreased. It was found that shoots and fruit borer population increased with increasing maximum temperature and positively correlated with maximum temperature. Two applications of seven insecticides viz; Flubendiamide 39.35 SC (0.01%), Chlorantraniliprole 20 SC (0.006%), Cypermethrin 25 EC (0.006%), Spinosad 45 SC (0.005%), Indoxacarb 14.5 SC (0.01%), Fipronil 5 SC (0.005%) and Imidacloprid 17.8 SL (0.004%) were evaluated against shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella. Minimum percent of shoot infestation, percent fruit infestation and B:C ratio were observed in Chlorantraniliprole with (2.77%, 4.97% and 1:3.13) respectively which was followed by Flubendiamide (3.94%, 6.44% and1:2.64) < Spinosad (6.79%, 7.68% and 1:3.08) < Indoxacarb (7.02%, 12.12%, and 1:2.26) < Cypermethrin (9.81%, 15.21%, and 1:2.50) Fipronil (10.76%, 17.98% and 1:2.52) < Imidacloprid (11.31%, 19.46% and1:2.72) < untreated control(water spray) (16.68%, 43.29% and 1:1.65) respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Earias vittella population increased with increasing maximum temperature and was positively correlated with maximum temperature.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Interactor
- Earias vittella
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=60)
Earias vittellae2pest - Outcome
- shoots and fruit borer populatione1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Qualifier
- increasing maximum temperaturee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“rainy season okra”
e1“shoots and fruit borer population increased with increasing maximum temperature and positively correlated with maximum temperature”
e2“were evaluated against shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”
Claim · model-written summary
Earias vittella infestation peaked at 48.61% in the second week of October.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
- Outcome
- peak level of infestatione1
- Value
- 48.61%e1
- Qualifier
- in October second weeke1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rainy season okra”
e1“Earias vittella population increased and gradually reached its peak level of infestation 48.61% in October second week”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoot and fruit borer infestation began in the third week of August at an average population of 2.69%.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Interactor
- shoot and fruit borere1pest
- Outcome
- average populatione1
- Value
- 2.69%e1
- Qualifier
- commenced from August third weeke1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rainy season okra”
e1“The occurrence of shoot and fruit borer commenced from August third week with an average population of 2.69% infestation”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole gave the lowest shoot infestation (2.77%) compared with untreated control (16.68%).
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Chlorantraniliprolee2
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
- Outcome
- shoot infestatione2
- Direction
- Minimume2
- Value
- 2.77%e2
- Qualifier
- 16.68%e3
- Comparator
- untreated control(water spray)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rainy season okra”
e1“were evaluated against shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”
e2“Minimum percent of shoot infestation, percent fruit infestation and B:C ratio were observed in Chlorantraniliprole with (2.77%, 4.97% and 1:3.13) respectively”
e3“untreated control(water spray) (16.68%, 43.29% and 1:1.65)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole gave the lowest fruit infestation (4.97%) compared with untreated control (43.29%).
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Chlorantraniliprolee2
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
- Outcome
- fruit infestatione2
- Direction
- Minimume2
- Value
- 4.97%e2
- Qualifier
- 43.29%e3
- Comparator
- untreated control(water spray)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rainy season okra”
e1“were evaluated against shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”
e2“Minimum percent of shoot infestation, percent fruit infestation and B:C ratio were observed in Chlorantraniliprole with (2.77%, 4.97% and 1:3.13) respectively”
e3“untreated control(water spray) (16.68%, 43.29% and 1:1.65)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole gave a B:C ratio of 1:3.13, higher than untreated control (1:1.65).
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Chlorantraniliprolee2
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe2
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 1:3.13e2
- Qualifier
- 1:1.65e3
- Comparator
- untreated control(water spray)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rainy season okra”
e1“were evaluated against shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”
e2“Minimum percent of shoot infestation, percent fruit infestation and B:C ratio were observed in Chlorantraniliprole with (2.77%, 4.97% and 1:3.13) respectively”
e3“untreated control(water spray) (16.68%, 43.29% and 1:1.65)”
Claim · model-written summary
Flubendiamide reduced shoot infestation to 3.94% compared with untreated control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Flubendiamidee4
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
- Outcome
- shoot infestatione2
- Direction
- lowerinferrede2
- Value
- 3.94%e4
- Comparator
- untreated control(water spray)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rainy season okra”
e1“were evaluated against shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”
e2“Minimum percent of shoot infestation, percent fruit infestation and B:C ratio were observed in Chlorantraniliprole with (2.77%, 4.97% and 1:3.13) respectively”
e3“untreated control(water spray) (16.68%, 43.29% and 1:1.65)”
e4“Flubendiamide (3.94%, 6.44% and1:2.64)”
Claim · model-written summary
Flubendiamide had 6.44% fruit infestation and a B:C ratio of 1:2.64, with mixed direction against untreated control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Flubendiamidee4
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
- Outcome
- fruit infestation and B:C ratioe2
- Value
- 6.44% and1:2.64e4
- Comparator
- untreated control(water spray)e3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rainy season okra”
e1“were evaluated against shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”
e2“Minimum percent of shoot infestation, percent fruit infestation and B:C ratio were observed in Chlorantraniliprole with (2.77%, 4.97% and 1:3.13) respectively”
e3“untreated control(water spray) (16.68%, 43.29% and 1:1.65)”
e4“Flubendiamide (3.94%, 6.44% and1:2.64)”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad reduced shoot infestation to 6.79% compared with untreated control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Spinosade4
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
- Outcome
- shoot infestatione2
- Direction
- lowerinferrede2
- Value
- 6.79%e4
- Comparator
- untreated control(water spray)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rainy season okra”
e1“were evaluated against shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”
e2“Minimum percent of shoot infestation, percent fruit infestation and B:C ratio were observed in Chlorantraniliprole with (2.77%, 4.97% and 1:3.13) respectively”
e3“untreated control(water spray) (16.68%, 43.29% and 1:1.65)”
e4“Spinosad (6.79%, 7.68% and 1:3.08)”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad had 7.68% fruit infestation and a B:C ratio of 1:3.08, with mixed direction against untreated control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Spinosade4
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
- Outcome
- fruit infestation and B:C ratioe2
- Value
- 7.68% and 1:3.08e4
- Comparator
- untreated control(water spray)e3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rainy season okra”
e1“were evaluated against shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”
e2“Minimum percent of shoot infestation, percent fruit infestation and B:C ratio were observed in Chlorantraniliprole with (2.77%, 4.97% and 1:3.13) respectively”
e3“untreated control(water spray) (16.68%, 43.29% and 1:1.65)”
e4“Spinosad (6.79%, 7.68% and 1:3.08)”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb reduced shoot infestation to 7.02% compared with untreated control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Indoxacarbe4
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
- Outcome
- shoot infestatione2
- Direction
- lowerinferrede2
- Value
- 7.02%e4
- Comparator
- untreated control(water spray)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rainy season okra”
e1“were evaluated against shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”
e2“Minimum percent of shoot infestation, percent fruit infestation and B:C ratio were observed in Chlorantraniliprole with (2.77%, 4.97% and 1:3.13) respectively”
e3“untreated control(water spray) (16.68%, 43.29% and 1:1.65)”
e4“Indoxacarb (7.02%, 12.12%, and 1:2.26)”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb had 12.12% fruit infestation and a B:C ratio of 1:2.26, with mixed direction against untreated control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Indoxacarbe4
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
- Outcome
- fruit infestation and B:C ratioe2
- Value
- 12.12%, and 1:2.26e4
- Comparator
- untreated control(water spray)e3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rainy season okra”
e1“were evaluated against shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”
e2“Minimum percent of shoot infestation, percent fruit infestation and B:C ratio were observed in Chlorantraniliprole with (2.77%, 4.97% and 1:3.13) respectively”
e3“untreated control(water spray) (16.68%, 43.29% and 1:1.65)”
e4“Indoxacarb (7.02%, 12.12%, and 1:2.26)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cypermethrin reduced shoot infestation to 9.81% compared with untreated control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Cypermethrine4
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
- Outcome
- shoot infestatione2
- Direction
- lowerinferrede2
- Value
- 9.81%e4
- Comparator
- untreated control(water spray)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rainy season okra”
e1“were evaluated against shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”
e2“Minimum percent of shoot infestation, percent fruit infestation and B:C ratio were observed in Chlorantraniliprole with (2.77%, 4.97% and 1:3.13) respectively”
e3“untreated control(water spray) (16.68%, 43.29% and 1:1.65)”
e4“Cypermethrin (9.81%, 15.21%, and 1:2.50)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cypermethrin had 15.21% fruit infestation and a B:C ratio of 1:2.50, with mixed direction against untreated control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Cypermethrine4
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
- Outcome
- fruit infestation and B:C ratioe2
- Value
- 15.21%, and 1:2.50e4
- Comparator
- untreated control(water spray)e3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rainy season okra”
e1“were evaluated against shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”
e2“Minimum percent of shoot infestation, percent fruit infestation and B:C ratio were observed in Chlorantraniliprole with (2.77%, 4.97% and 1:3.13) respectively”
e3“untreated control(water spray) (16.68%, 43.29% and 1:1.65)”
e4“Cypermethrin (9.81%, 15.21%, and 1:2.50)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fipronil reduced shoot infestation to 10.76% compared with untreated control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Fipronile4
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
- Outcome
- shoot infestatione2
- Direction
- lowerinferrede2
- Value
- 10.76%e4
- Comparator
- untreated control(water spray)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rainy season okra”
e1“were evaluated against shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”
e2“Minimum percent of shoot infestation, percent fruit infestation and B:C ratio were observed in Chlorantraniliprole with (2.77%, 4.97% and 1:3.13) respectively”
e3“untreated control(water spray) (16.68%, 43.29% and 1:1.65)”
e4“Fipronil (10.76%, 17.98% and 1:2.52)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fipronil had 17.98% fruit infestation and a B:C ratio of 1:2.52, with mixed direction against untreated control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Fipronile4
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
- Outcome
- fruit infestation and B:C ratioe2
- Value
- 17.98% and 1:2.52e4
- Comparator
- untreated control(water spray)e3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rainy season okra”
e1“were evaluated against shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”
e2“Minimum percent of shoot infestation, percent fruit infestation and B:C ratio were observed in Chlorantraniliprole with (2.77%, 4.97% and 1:3.13) respectively”
e3“untreated control(water spray) (16.68%, 43.29% and 1:1.65)”
e4“Fipronil (10.76%, 17.98% and 1:2.52)”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid reduced shoot infestation to 11.31% compared with untreated control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Imidaclopride4
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
- Outcome
- shoot infestatione2
- Direction
- lowerinferrede2
- Value
- 11.31%e4
- Comparator
- untreated control(water spray)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rainy season okra”
e1“were evaluated against shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”
e2“Minimum percent of shoot infestation, percent fruit infestation and B:C ratio were observed in Chlorantraniliprole with (2.77%, 4.97% and 1:3.13) respectively”
e3“untreated control(water spray) (16.68%, 43.29% and 1:1.65)”
e4“Imidacloprid (11.31%, 19.46% and1:2.72)”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid had 19.46% fruit infestation and a B:C ratio of 1:2.72, with mixed direction against untreated control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Imidaclopride4
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
- Outcome
- fruit infestation and B:C ratioe2
- Value
- 19.46% and1:2.72e4
- Comparator
- untreated control(water spray)e3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“rainy season okra”
e1“were evaluated against shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella”
e2“Minimum percent of shoot infestation, percent fruit infestation and B:C ratio were observed in Chlorantraniliprole with (2.77%, 4.97% and 1:3.13) respectively”
e3“untreated control(water spray) (16.68%, 43.29% and 1:1.65)”
e4“Imidacloprid (11.31%, 19.46% and1:2.72)”
The same questions in other papers
fipronil · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →flubendiamide · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →indoxacarb · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →imidacloprid · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →chlorantraniliprole · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
14 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →cypermethrin · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
14 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →spinosad · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
19 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.