Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of macro and micro nutrients application on yield attributes and yield in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under late sown conditions

Yash Gupta; Ishwar Singh; RK Behl; et al.

6
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during winter (Rabi) season of 2022-2033 to study “Effect of macro and micro nutrients application on yield attributes and yield in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under late sown conditions”. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD), three replications of a single variety and ten nutrient treatments. The ten nutrient treatment were T1: 50% RDF +20 kg/ha MgSO4, T2: 50% RDF +20 kg/ha FeSO4, T3: 50% RDF +20 kg/ha ZnSO4, T4: 75% RDF +15 kg/ha MgSO4, T5: 75% RDF +15 kg/ha FeSO4, T6: 75% RDF +15 kg/ha ZnSO4, T7: 100% RDF 150:60:60 kg/ha N:P2O5:K2O, T8: 100% RDF + 10 kg/ha MgSO4, T9: 100% RDF + 10 kg/ha FeSO4, T10: 100% RDF + 10 kg/ha ZnSO4. The findings showed that the biological yield, grain yield, straw yield, (111.99, 49.48, and 62.51 q/ha) were reported highest in 100% recommended dose of fertilizers + 10 kg/ha ZnSO4 respectively. The highest gross, net returns was obtained in T10 followed by T9, while minimum gross return and net return was obtained in T1. Highest value of B: C ratio (1.46) was obtained in T10.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological yield was highest, 111.99 q/ha, with 100% recommended dose of fertilizers plus 10 kg/ha ZnSO4.

Treatment
100% recommended dose of fertilizers + 10 kg/ha ZnSO4e2
Outcome
biological yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
111.99e2
Qualifier
q/hae2
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during winter (Rabi) season of 2022-2033”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under late sown conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–220 · show in text ↑
e2

“The findings showed that the biological yield, grain yield, straw yield, (111.99, 49.48, and 62.51 q/ha) were reported highest in 100% recommended dose of fertilizers + 10 kg/ha ZnSO4 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was highest, 49.48 q/ha, with 100% recommended dose of fertilizers plus 10 kg/ha ZnSO4.

Treatment
100% recommended dose of fertilizers + 10 kg/ha ZnSO4e2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
49.48e2
Qualifier
q/hae2
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during winter (Rabi) season of 2022-2033”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under late sown conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–220 · show in text ↑
e2

“The findings showed that the biological yield, grain yield, straw yield, (111.99, 49.48, and 62.51 q/ha) were reported highest in 100% recommended dose of fertilizers + 10 kg/ha ZnSO4 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw yield was highest, 62.51 q/ha, with 100% recommended dose of fertilizers plus 10 kg/ha ZnSO4.

Treatment
100% recommended dose of fertilizers + 10 kg/ha ZnSO4e2
Outcome
straw yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
62.51e2
Qualifier
q/hae2
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during winter (Rabi) season of 2022-2033”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under late sown conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–220 · show in text ↑
e2

“The findings showed that the biological yield, grain yield, straw yield, (111.99, 49.48, and 62.51 q/ha) were reported highest in 100% recommended dose of fertilizers + 10 kg/ha ZnSO4 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gross and net returns were highest with T10 (100% RDF plus 10 kg/ha ZnSO4), followed by T9.

Treatment
T10: 100% RDF + 10 kg/ha ZnSO4e3
Outcome
gross, net returnse4
Direction
higheste4
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during winter (Rabi) season of 2022-2033”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under late sown conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–220 · show in text ↑
e3

“T10: 100% RDF + 10 kg/ha ZnSO4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–692 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest gross, net returns was obtained in T10 followed by T9, while minimum gross return and net return was obtained in T1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gross and net returns were minimum with T1 (50% RDF plus 20 kg/ha MgSO4).

Treatment
T1e4
Outcome
gross return and net returne4
Direction
minimume4
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during winter (Rabi) season of 2022-2033”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under late sown conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–220 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest gross, net returns was obtained in T10 followed by T9, while minimum gross return and net return was obtained in T1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest benefit-cost ratio, 1.46, was obtained with T10.

Treatment
T10e5
Outcome
B: C ratioe5
Direction
Highest valuee5
Value
1.46e5
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted during winter (Rabi) season of 2022-2033”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under late sown conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–220 · show in text ↑
e5

“Highest value of B: C ratio (1.46) was obtained in T10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1075 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

100 papers: 98 positive, 2 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.