Paper · 2024 · Journal of Food Protection

Irrigation Method Matters: Contamination and Die-off Rates of Escherichia coli on Dry Bulb Onions After Overhead and Drip Irrigation in Washington State (2022–2023)

Jason Racine; Alexandra Nerney; Samantha Kilgore; et al.

11
claims
16
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two U.S. outbreaks of salmonellosis in 2020 and 2021 were epidemiologically linked to red onions. The 2020 outbreak investigation implicated the production of agricultural water as a likely contamination source. Field trials were designed to investigate the prevalence and survival of Escherichia coli (surrogate for Salmonella) on dry bulb onions after the application of contaminated irrigation water at the end of the growing period. Irrigation water was inoculated at 3 log most probable number (MPN)/100 mL (2022 and 2023) or 5 log MPN/100 mL (2023, drip only) with a cocktail of rifampin-resistant E. coli and applied with the final irrigation (0.4 acre-inch/0.4 ha-cm) to onions. Onion bulbs (40 or 80) were sampled immediately after irrigation and throughout field curing (4 weeks) and E. coli was enumerated using an MPN method. For drip irrigation, at 3 log MPN/100 mL E. coli was detected on 13% of onions at 24 h but not detected at 0 h; at 5 log MPN/100 mL for drip irrigation applied to saturated soil, E. coli was detected in 63% of onions at 0 h. Prevalence significantly (P < 0.05), decreased after 7 d of curing with cell densities of 1-1,400 MPN/onion. At the end of field curing in 2023, 1/80 of onions had detectable E. coli (2.04 MPN/onion). E. coli was detected in a significantly smaller percentage of onions (2022: 13%; 2023: 68%) after a contaminated drip irrigation event compared to overhead irrigation (98-100%; P < 0.05). After overhead irrigation, E. coli was detected in onions (1-1,000 MPN/onion) on day 0. Prevalence decreased significantly (P < 0.05) after 7 d of field curing in both years (2022: 15%; 2023: 7%). E. coli was not detected on Calibra onions (80/year) at the end of field curing in either year but was detected at <12 MPN/onion in 2.5-3.75% of onions (n = 80) for other cultivars. These data confirm limited contamination risk associated with drip irrigation water quality and begin to quantify contamination risks associated with overhead irrigation of dry bulb onions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 3-log contaminated drip irrigation, E. coli was detected on 13% of onions at 24 h and absent at 0 h.

Taxon
Dry Bulb Onionst0
Outcome
E. coli was detected one0
Value
13%e0
Qualifier
24 he0

Verbatim

e0

“at 3 log MPN/100 mL E. coli was detected on 13% of onions at 24 h but not detected at 0 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bulb Onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 5-log contaminated drip irrigation on saturated soil, E. coli was detected on 63% of onions at 0 h.

Taxon
Dry Bulb Onionst0
Outcome
E. coli was detected ine0
Value
63%e0
Qualifier
at 0 he0

Verbatim

e0

“at 5 log MPN/100 mL for drip irrigation applied to saturated soil, E. coli was detected in 63% of onions at 0 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bulb Onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

E. coli prevalence decreased significantly after seven days of curing.

Taxon
Dry Bulb Onionst0
Outcome
Prevalencee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
1-1,400 MPN/onione0
Qualifier
after 7 d of curinge0

Verbatim

e0

“Prevalence significantly (P < 0.05), decreased after 7 d of curing with cell densities of 1-1,400 MPN/onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bulb Onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the end of 2023 field curing, one of 80 onions had detectable E. coli at 2.04 MPN/onion.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae0
Outcome
detectable E. colie0
Value
2.04 MPN/onione0
Qualifier
1/80 of onionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the end of field curing in 2023, 1/80 of onions had detectable E. coli (2.04 MPN/onion)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Contaminated drip irrigation left E. coli on 13% of onions in 2022, fewer than overhead irrigation.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae0
Treatment
contaminated drip irrigatione0
Outcome
E. coli was detectede0
Direction
smallere0
Value
13%e0
Qualifier
2022e0
Comparator
overhead irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“E. coli was detected in a significantly smaller percentage of onions (2022: 13%; 2023: 68%) after a contaminated drip irrigation event compared to overhead irrigation (98-100%; P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Contaminated drip irrigation left E. coli on 68% of onions in 2023, fewer than overhead irrigation.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae0
Treatment
contaminated drip irrigatione0
Outcome
E. coli was detectede0
Direction
smallere0
Value
68%e0
Qualifier
2023e0
Comparator
overhead irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“E. coli was detected in a significantly smaller percentage of onions (2022: 13%; 2023: 68%) after a contaminated drip irrigation event compared to overhead irrigation (98-100%; P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1450 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Following overhead irrigation, E. coli was detected on onions at 1-1,000 MPN/onion on day zero.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae0
Outcome
E. coli was detectede0
Value
1-1,000 MPN/onione0
Qualifier
day 0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After overhead irrigation, E. coli was detected in onions (1-1,000 MPN/onion) on day 0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1538 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Following overhead irrigation, E. coli prevalence fell significantly to 15% after seven days of curing in 2022.

Taxon
Dry Bulb Onionst0
Outcome
Prevalencee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
15%e0
Qualifier
2022e0

Verbatim

e0

“Prevalence decreased significantly (P < 0.05) after 7 d of field curing in both years (2022: 15%; 2023: 7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bulb Onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Following overhead irrigation, E. coli prevalence fell significantly to 7% after seven days of curing in 2023.

Taxon
Dry Bulb Onionst0
Outcome
Prevalencee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
7%e0
Qualifier
2023e0

Verbatim

e0

“Prevalence decreased significantly (P < 0.05) after 7 d of field curing in both years (2022: 15%; 2023: 7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bulb Onions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

E. coli was absent from Calibra onions at the end of curing in both years.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae0
Material
Calibrae0
Outcome
E. coli was not detectede0
Qualifier
at the end of field curing in either yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“E. coli was not detected on Calibra onions (80/year) at the end of field curing in either year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1743 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other onion cultivars had E. coli in 2.5-3.75% of bulbs at less than 12 MPN/onion after curing.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae0
Material
other cultivarse0
Outcome
detectede0
Value
2.5-3.75%e0
Qualifier
<12 MPN/onione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was detected at <12 MPN/onion in 2.5-3.75% of onions (n = 80) for other cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1748–1829 · show in text ↑

irrigation · organism · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.