Paper · 2024 · Range Management and Agroforestry

Growth and quality parameters of oat (Avena sativa L.) cultivars as influenced by different cutting management in irrigated subtropical conditions

Akhil Bharti; Vijay Khajuria; B.C. Sharma; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An investigation was conducted at SKUAST, Jammu, during Rabi 2018-19 and 2019-20 to assess the effect of different cutting managements on the growth and quality of multicut oat cultivars. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with 14 treatments and three replications. A severe drop in plant height and number of tillers/m2 was observed in double cut management system at maturity. Higher fresh and dry weight was recorded at the second cut than at the first cut, resulting in a higher forage yield. However, in the case of quality parameters, no significant difference among the treatments was recorded on the cuttings. Fodder oats harvested at 60 days after sowing (DAS) recorded higher crude protein and lower acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and hemicellulose when compared to those harvested at 105 DAS. Thus, on the basis of two years of experimentation, it was concluded that a single cut provides superior quality fodder. However, if an additional cut is taken at 105 DAS, there is a slight reduction in the quality of fodder, but higher fresh and dry weights of fodder are obtained. However, single-cut treatments recorded superior plant height, number of tillers, grain as well as straw weight. Among cultivars, JHO-2000-4 stood out in both the cutting managements in almost all the parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double cutting severely reduced plant height and tiller density at maturity.

Treatment
double cut management systeme0
Outcome
plant height and number of tillers/m2e0
Direction
drope0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A severe drop in plant height and number of tillers/m2 was observed in double cut management system at maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–400 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh and dry weight at the second cut exceeded the first cut and produced higher forage yield.

Treatment
second cute0
Outcome
fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
Highere0
Comparator
first cute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher fresh and dry weight was recorded at the second cut than at the first cut, resulting in a higher forage yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting treatments did not differ significantly in quality parameters.

Outcome
significant difference among the treatmentse0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant difference among the treatments was recorded on the cuttings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest at 60 DAS produced higher crude protein than 105 DAS.

Treatment
60 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Outcome
crude proteine0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
105 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fodder oats harvested at 60 days after sowing (DAS) recorded higher crude protein and lower acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and hemicellulose when compared to those harvested at 105 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest at 60 DAS produced lower acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber and hemicellulose than 105 DAS.

Treatment
60 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Outcome
acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and hemicellulosee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
105 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fodder oats harvested at 60 days after sowing (DAS) recorded higher crude protein and lower acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and hemicellulose when compared to those harvested at 105 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–54 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single cut was judged to provide superior fodder quality.

Outcome
single cut provides superior quality foddere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was concluded that a single cut provides superior quality fodder.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An additional cut at 105 DAS slightly reduced fodder quality.

Treatment
an additional cute0
Outcome
quality of foddere0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
105 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“if an additional cut is taken at 105 DAS, there is a slight reduction in the quality of fodder, but higher fresh and dry weights of fodder are obtained.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An additional cut at 105 DAS increased fresh and dry fodder weights.

Treatment
an additional cute0
Outcome
fresh and dry weights of foddere0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
105 DASe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“if an additional cut is taken at 105 DAS, there is a slight reduction in the quality of fodder, but higher fresh and dry weights of fodder are obtained.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single-cut treatments had superior plant height, tiller number, grain weight and straw weight.

Treatment
single-cut treatmentse0
Outcome
plant height, number of tillers, grain as well as straw weighte0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“single-cut treatments recorded superior plant height, number of tillers, grain as well as straw weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JHO-2000-4 stood out under both cutting systems on almost all parameters.

Material
JHO-2000-4e0
Outcome
stood out in both the cutting managements in almost all the parameterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among cultivars, JHO-2000-4 stood out in both the cutting managements in almost all the parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat (Avena sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–54 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.