Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Antagonistic and Plant Growth-Promoting Properties of Streptomyces F2 Isolated from Vineyard Soil

Shengnan Li; Weiqu Liang; Hao Huang; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Streptomyces can produce secondary metabolites with a wide range of activities and is often used in agriculture as a biocontrol strain to control soil-borne diseases. Screening and isolation from infected soil is an effective method to obtain active strains. In this study, the best antagonistic inter-root growth-promoting bacteria were isolated from grapevine inter-root soil samples, and strain F2 was identified as Streptomyces sp. based on morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics as well as 16S rDNA sequencing results. The results showed that the fermentation broth/liquid and sterile filtrate of strain F2 exhibited antagonistic effects against 10 plant pathogens, with an inhibition rate reaching up to 80%. Notably, two of them exhibited remarkable inhibitory effects against Phytophthora capsici with inhibition rates of 80.58% and 87.71%, respectively. The P. capsici leaf control experiment revealed that the control effect of strain F2 fermentation liquid on P. capsici filaments was 61.09%. Furthermore, indoor pot experiments demonstrated that the fermentation liquid of strain F2 had a significant inhibitory effect on pepper blight, with a maximum inhibition of 83.31%. Antagonistic factor analysis indicated that strain F2 had specific organophosphorus hydrolysis, nitrogen fixation, extracellular protease secretion, and IAA production capabilities. Additionally, root treatment with strain F2’s fermentation liquid significantly enhanced capsicum growth. Taking together, Streptomyces F2 not only exhibits a wide-spectrum antagonistic effect against plant pathogens but also promotes plant growth, which suggests that Streptomyces F2 can be used as an effective biological control resource and provides important theoretical support for the application of Streptomyces F2.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain F2 was identified as Streptomyces sp.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Interactor
Streptomyces sp.Streptomyces sp.e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
identified as Streptomyces sp.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Streptomyces sp.
Streptomyces sp. · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strain F2 was identified as Streptomyces sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–435 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevine inter-root soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–385 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain F2 broth inhibited ten plant pathogens by up to 80%.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Interactor
plant pathogense0pathogen
Outcome
inhibition ratee0
Direction
antagonistic effectse0
Value
80%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fermentation broth/liquid and sterile filtrate of strain F2 exhibited antagonistic effects against 10 plant pathogens, with an inhibition rate reaching up to 80%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–737 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevine inter-root soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–385 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F2 fermentation broth inhibited Phytophthora capsici by 80.58%.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Interactor
Phytophthora capsiciPhytophthora capsicie0pathogen
Outcome
inhibition ratese0
Direction
inhibitorye0
Value
80.58%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora capsici
Phytophthora capsici · InteractorElsa Paderes, Landcare Research NZ Ltd. · CC BY 3.0 nz · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two of them exhibited remarkable inhibitory effects against Phytophthora capsici with inhibition rates of 80.58% and 87.71%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–885 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevine inter-root soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–385 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F2 sterile filtrate inhibited Phytophthora capsici by 87.71%.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Interactor
Phytophthora capsiciPhytophthora capsicie0pathogen
Outcome
inhibition ratese0
Direction
inhibitorye0
Value
87.71%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora capsici
Phytophthora capsici · InteractorElsa Paderes, Landcare Research NZ Ltd. · CC BY 3.0 nz · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two of them exhibited remarkable inhibitory effects against Phytophthora capsici with inhibition rates of 80.58% and 87.71%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–885 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevine inter-root soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F2 fermentation liquid controlled P. capsici filaments by 61.09% in a leaf assay.

Taxon
peppere2
Treatment
strain F2 fermentation liquide0
Interactor
P. capsiciPhytophthora capsicie0pathogen
Outcome
control effecte0
Value
61.09%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora capsici
Phytophthora capsici · InteractorElsa Paderes, Landcare Research NZ Ltd. · CC BY 3.0 nz · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the control effect of strain F2 fermentation liquid on P. capsici filaments was 61.09%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1026 · show in text ↑
e1

“P. capsici leaf control experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–924 · show in text ↑
e2

“pepper blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F2 fermentation liquid inhibited pepper blight by up to 83.31%.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
fermentation liquid of strain F2e0
Outcome
pepper blighte0
Direction
inhibitorye0
Value
83.31%e0
Setting
indoor pot experimentse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the fermentation liquid of strain F2 had a significant inhibitory effect on pepper blight, with a maximum inhibition of 83.31%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1208 · show in text ↑
e1

“indoor pot experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1062 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain F2 showed organophosphorus hydrolysis, nitrogen fixation, protease secretion and IAA production capabilities.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Interactor
strain F2e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
organophosphorus hydrolysis, nitrogen fixation, extracellular protease secretion, and IAA production capabilitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strain F2 had specific organophosphorus hydrolysis, nitrogen fixation, extracellular protease secretion, and IAA production capabilities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1390 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevine inter-root soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root treatment with F2 fermentation liquid significantly enhanced capsicum growth.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume0
Treatment
root treatment with strain F2’s fermentation liquide0
Interactor
strain F2e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
capsicum growthe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root treatment with strain F2’s fermentation liquid significantly enhanced capsicum growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1496 · show in text ↑

processing · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.