Paper · 2024 · Ecology Environment and Conservation

Validation of Insecticide Resistance Management (IRM) Based Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies for the Management of pink bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) in Bt cotton

M. Sivarama Krishna; L. Vijaya Bhaskar; N.C. Venkateswrlu

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A two year field study was conducted on validation of IRM based IPM strategies for the management of pink bollworm in Bt cotton in nearly twenty cotton farmer fields during 2021-22 and 2022-23 in selected villages of Kurnool district under IRM-Pink bollworm management project sponsored by Central institute for cotton Research, Nagpur.During the year 2021-22 IRM demo plots had recorded green boll, open boll and locule damage of 9.5, 10.2, and 6.25% respectively where as non IRM plots had recorded 21.8, 22.4 and 14.2% respectively.During the year 2022-23 IRM plots recorded green boll damage, open boll and locule damage of 8.2, 9.6 and 7.1% respectively where as non IRM plots recorded 20.2, 20.8 and 14.49% respectively.Average insecticidal sprays during both years in IRM farmer fields were 3.85 where as in non IRM plots it was 6.85, IRM farmer had registered a average benefit -cost ratio of 1.16:1 where as in non IRM practice it was 0.33:1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IRM plots had lower green boll damage in 2021-22, 9.5 versus 21.8%.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
IRM demo plotse0
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellat0pest
Outcome
green bolle0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
9.5e0
Qualifier
2021-22e0
Comparator
non IRM plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the year 2021-22 IRM demo plots had recorded green boll, open boll and locule damage of 9.5, 10.2, and 6.25% respectively where as non IRM plots had recorded 21.8, 22.4 and 14.2% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–535 · show in text ↑
t0

“pink bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) in Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IRM plots had lower open boll damage in 2021-22, 10.2 versus 22.4%.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
IRM demo plotse0
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellat0pest
Outcome
open bolle0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
10.2e0
Qualifier
2021-22e0
Comparator
non IRM plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the year 2021-22 IRM demo plots had recorded green boll, open boll and locule damage of 9.5, 10.2, and 6.25% respectively where as non IRM plots had recorded 21.8, 22.4 and 14.2% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–535 · show in text ↑
t0

“pink bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) in Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IRM plots had lower locule damage in 2021-22, 6.25% versus 14.2%.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
IRM demo plotse0
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellat0pest
Outcome
locule damagee0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
6.25%e0
Qualifier
2021-22e0
Comparator
non IRM plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the year 2021-22 IRM demo plots had recorded green boll, open boll and locule damage of 9.5, 10.2, and 6.25% respectively where as non IRM plots had recorded 21.8, 22.4 and 14.2% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–535 · show in text ↑
t0

“pink bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) in Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IRM plots had lower green boll damage in 2022-23, 8.2 versus 20.2%.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
IRM plotse0
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellat0pest
Outcome
green boll damagee0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
8.2e0
Qualifier
2022-23e0
Comparator
non IRM plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the year 2022-23 IRM plots recorded green boll damage, open boll and locule damage of 8.2, 9.6 and 7.1% respectively where as non IRM plots recorded 20.2, 20.8 and 14.49% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“pink bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) in Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IRM plots had lower open boll damage in 2022-23, 9.6 versus 20.8%.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
IRM plotse0
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellat0pest
Outcome
open bolle0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
9.6e0
Qualifier
2022-23e0
Comparator
non IRM plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the year 2022-23 IRM plots recorded green boll damage, open boll and locule damage of 8.2, 9.6 and 7.1% respectively where as non IRM plots recorded 20.2, 20.8 and 14.49% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“pink bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) in Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IRM plots had lower locule damage in 2022-23, 7.1% versus 14.49%.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
IRM plotse0
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellat0pest
Outcome
locule damagee0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
7.1%e0
Qualifier
2022-23e0
Comparator
non IRM plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the year 2022-23 IRM plots recorded green boll damage, open boll and locule damage of 8.2, 9.6 and 7.1% respectively where as non IRM plots recorded 20.2, 20.8 and 14.49% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“pink bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) in Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IRM fields averaged fewer insecticide sprays, 3.85 versus 6.85 across both years.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
IRM farmer fieldse0
Outcome
Average insecticidal sprayse0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
3.85e0
Qualifier
6.85e0
Comparator
non IRM plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“Average insecticidal sprays during both years in IRM farmer fields were 3.85 where as in non IRM plots it was 6.85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 179–188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IRM practice had a higher average benefit-cost ratio, 1.16:1 versus 0.33:1.

Treatment
IRMe0
Outcome
benefit -cost ratioe0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
1.16:1e0
Qualifier
0.33:1e0
Comparator
non IRM practicee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“IRM farmer had registered a average benefit -cost ratio of 1.16:1 where as in non IRM practice it was 0.33:1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–951 · show in text ↑

insecticide · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.