Intervention effectmodel-written summary

IRM plots had lower open boll damage in 2021-22, 10.2 versus 22.4%.

A claim from Validation of Insecticide Resistance Management (IRM) Based Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies for the Management of pink bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) in Bt cotton · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IRM plots had lower open boll damage in 2021-22, 10.2 versus 22.4%.

Taxon
Bt cottont0
Treatment
IRM demo plotse0
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellat0pest
Outcome
open bolle0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
10.2e0
Qualifier
2021-22e0
Comparator
non IRM plotse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the year 2021-22 IRM demo plots had recorded green boll, open boll and locule damage of 9.5, 10.2, and 6.25% respectively where as non IRM plots had recorded 21.8, 22.4 and 14.2% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–535
t0

“pink bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) in Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–188

Title

Validation of Insecticide Resistance Management (IRM) Based Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies for the Management of pink bollworm Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) in Bt cotton

M. Sivarama Krishna; L. Vijaya Bhaskar; N.C. Venkateswrlu Ecology Environment and Conservation 2024. doi:10.53550/eec.2024.v30i02.080

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-a1cce99e2d509dbd4d9f4632fc893851b3b36e4c6c62fe40a17a96f473cb0c61 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

insecticide · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.