Paper · 2013 · Alexandria Science Exchange Journal

Influence of some New Insecticides Mixtures against Cotton Bollworms and Their Side Effects on Associated Predators

El-Dewy, Madeha E.H.; El-Zahi, El-Zahi S.

16
claims
37
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Bollworms resistance to most registered insecticides has become a major obstacle to their successful chemical control with conventional insecticides. Therefore, field experiments were conducted at Sakha Agricultural Research Station in 2010 and 2011 cotton seasons to study the efficiency of four new mixtures (M) of insecticides, i.e. chloropyrifos + cypermethrin (M1), chloropyrifos + lufenuron (M2), flufenoxuron + alpha-cypermethrin (M3) and thiamethoxam + lambda-cyhalothrin (M4) and two conventional insecticides, chloropyrifos and alphacypermethrin, against cotton bollworms, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) and Earias insulana (Boisd.). Also, their side effects on associated predators were studied. In 2010 season, M3 and alpha-cypermethrin in three successive sprays of each proved to be the superior recording 81.58 and 79.85% reduction in larval infestation, respectively. M4, M1 and chloropyrifos came in the second order without significant differences causing 77.38, 76.65 and 75.27% reduction, respectively. M2 was the least effective with reduction percentage of 74.15. The results of 2011 season showed the same trend of effect for all the tested compounds. According to their side-effects against associated predators, the tested toxicants could be arranged descendingly as follows, alpha-cypermethrin (81.00), M4 (77.96), M3 (76.68), M1 (69.02), M2 (66.07) and chloropyrifos (64.28) % reduction. The obtained results indicated that, the new tested mixtures of insecticides did not exhibit additional advantages in control of the cotton bollworms comparing to the conventional toxicants, where they showed approximately the same effectiveness against the pest and were harmful to the associated predators. Moreover, cross-resistance could be developed after repeated application of these mixtures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the 2010 cotton season, three successive sprays of the mixture M3 (flufenoxuron + alpha-cypermethrin) reduced bollworm larval infestation by 81.58%, among the superior treatments.

Treatment
M3e0
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae1pest
Second interactor
Earias insulanaEarias insulanae1pest
Outcome
larval infestatione2
Direction
reductione0
Value
81.58e0
Qualifier
In 2010 seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias insulana
Earias insulana · Second interactorgailhampshire from Cradley, Malvern, U.K · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2010 season, M3 and alpha-cypermethrin in three successive sprays of each proved to be the superior recording 81.58 and 79.85% reduction in larval infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–871 · show in text ↑
e1

“against cotton bollworms, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) and Earias insulana (Boisd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–645 · show in text ↑
e2

“larval infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the 2010 cotton season, three successive sprays of alpha-cypermethrin reduced bollworm larval infestation by 79.85%, among the superior treatments.

Treatment
alpha-cypermethrine0
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae1pest
Second interactor
Earias insulanaEarias insulanae1pest
Outcome
larval infestatione2
Direction
reductione0
Value
79.85%e0
Qualifier
In 2010 seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias insulana
Earias insulana · Second interactorgailhampshire from Cradley, Malvern, U.K · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2010 season, M3 and alpha-cypermethrin in three successive sprays of each proved to be the superior recording 81.58 and 79.85% reduction in larval infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–871 · show in text ↑
e1

“against cotton bollworms, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) and Earias insulana (Boisd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–645 · show in text ↑
e2

“larval infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2010, the mixture M4 reduced larval infestation by 77.38%, in the second order without significant differences from M1 and chloropyrifos.

Treatment
M4e0
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae1pest
Second interactor
Earias insulanaEarias insulanae1pest
Outcome
larval infestatione2
Direction
reductione0
Value
77.38e0
Qualifier
without significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias insulana
Earias insulana · Second interactorgailhampshire from Cradley, Malvern, U.K · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M4, M1 and chloropyrifos came in the second order without significant differences causing 77.38, 76.65 and 75.27% reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1010 · show in text ↑
e1

“against cotton bollworms, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) and Earias insulana (Boisd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–645 · show in text ↑
e2

“larval infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2010, the mixture M1 reduced larval infestation by 76.65%, in the second order without significant differences from M4 and chloropyrifos.

Treatment
M1e0
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae1pest
Second interactor
Earias insulanaEarias insulanae1pest
Outcome
larval infestatione2
Direction
reductione0
Value
76.65e0
Qualifier
without significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias insulana
Earias insulana · Second interactorgailhampshire from Cradley, Malvern, U.K · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M4, M1 and chloropyrifos came in the second order without significant differences causing 77.38, 76.65 and 75.27% reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1010 · show in text ↑
e1

“against cotton bollworms, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) and Earias insulana (Boisd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–645 · show in text ↑
e2

“larval infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2010, chloropyrifos reduced larval infestation by 75.27%, in the second order without significant differences from M4 and M1.

Treatment
chloropyrifose0
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae1pest
Second interactor
Earias insulanaEarias insulanae1pest
Outcome
larval infestatione2
Direction
reductione0
Value
75.27%e0
Qualifier
without significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias insulana
Earias insulana · Second interactorgailhampshire from Cradley, Malvern, U.K · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M4, M1 and chloropyrifos came in the second order without significant differences causing 77.38, 76.65 and 75.27% reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1010 · show in text ↑
e1

“against cotton bollworms, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) and Earias insulana (Boisd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–645 · show in text ↑
e2

“larval infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2010, the mixture M2 was the least effective, with a 74.15 reduction percentage of larval infestation.

Treatment
M2e0
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae1pest
Second interactor
Earias insulanaEarias insulanae1pest
Outcome
larval infestatione2
Direction
reductione0
Value
74.15e0
Qualifier
least effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias insulana
Earias insulana · Second interactorgailhampshire from Cradley, Malvern, U.K · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M2 was the least effective with reduction percentage of 74.15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1087 · show in text ↑
e1

“against cotton bollworms, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) and Earias insulana (Boisd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–645 · show in text ↑
e2

“larval infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2011 season showed the same trend of effect as 2010 for all the tested insecticide compounds on bollworm infestation.

Treatment
all the tested compoundse0
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae1pest
Second interactor
Earias insulanaEarias insulanae1pest
Outcome
same trend of effecte0
Direction
same trende0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias insulana
Earias insulana · Second interactorgailhampshire from Cradley, Malvern, U.K · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results of 2011 season showed the same trend of effect for all the tested compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1176 · show in text ↑
e1

“against cotton bollworms, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) and Earias insulana (Boisd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alpha-cypermethrin caused an 81.00% reduction of associated predators in cotton.

Treatment
alpha-cypermethrine0
Interactor
associated predatorse0other
Outcome
side-effects against associated predatorse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
81.00e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“side-effects against associated predators, the tested toxicants could be arranged descendingly as follows, alpha-cypermethrin (81.00), M4 (77.96), M3 (76.68), M1 (69.02), M2 (66.07) and chloropyrifos (64.28) % reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1416 · show in text ↑
e1

“against cotton bollworms, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) and Earias insulana (Boisd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture M4 caused a 77.96% reduction of associated predators in cotton.

Treatment
M4e0
Interactor
associated predatorse0other
Outcome
side-effects against associated predatorse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
77.96e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“side-effects against associated predators, the tested toxicants could be arranged descendingly as follows, alpha-cypermethrin (81.00), M4 (77.96), M3 (76.68), M1 (69.02), M2 (66.07) and chloropyrifos (64.28) % reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1416 · show in text ↑
e1

“against cotton bollworms, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) and Earias insulana (Boisd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture M3 caused a 76.68% reduction of associated predators in cotton.

Treatment
M3e0
Interactor
associated predatorse0other
Outcome
side-effects against associated predatorse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
76.68e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“side-effects against associated predators, the tested toxicants could be arranged descendingly as follows, alpha-cypermethrin (81.00), M4 (77.96), M3 (76.68), M1 (69.02), M2 (66.07) and chloropyrifos (64.28) % reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1416 · show in text ↑
e1

“against cotton bollworms, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) and Earias insulana (Boisd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture M1 caused a 69.02% reduction of associated predators in cotton.

Treatment
M1e0
Interactor
associated predatorse0other
Outcome
side-effects against associated predatorse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
69.02e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“side-effects against associated predators, the tested toxicants could be arranged descendingly as follows, alpha-cypermethrin (81.00), M4 (77.96), M3 (76.68), M1 (69.02), M2 (66.07) and chloropyrifos (64.28) % reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1416 · show in text ↑
e1

“against cotton bollworms, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) and Earias insulana (Boisd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture M2 caused a 66.07% reduction of associated predators in cotton.

Treatment
M2e0
Interactor
associated predatorse0other
Outcome
side-effects against associated predatorse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
66.07e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“side-effects against associated predators, the tested toxicants could be arranged descendingly as follows, alpha-cypermethrin (81.00), M4 (77.96), M3 (76.68), M1 (69.02), M2 (66.07) and chloropyrifos (64.28) % reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1416 · show in text ↑
e1

“against cotton bollworms, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) and Earias insulana (Boisd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloropyrifos caused a 64.28% reduction of associated predators in cotton.

Treatment
chloropyrifose0
Interactor
associated predatorse0other
Outcome
side-effects against associated predatorse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
64.28e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“side-effects against associated predators, the tested toxicants could be arranged descendingly as follows, alpha-cypermethrin (81.00), M4 (77.96), M3 (76.68), M1 (69.02), M2 (66.07) and chloropyrifos (64.28) % reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1416 · show in text ↑
e1

“against cotton bollworms, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) and Earias insulana (Boisd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The new insecticide mixtures gave no additional advantage in controlling cotton bollworms over the conventional insecticides, with approximately the same effectiveness against the pest.

Treatment
new tested mixtures of insecticidese0
Interactor
Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae1pest
Second interactor
Earias insulanaEarias insulanae1pest
Outcome
control of the cotton bollwormse0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Qualifier
approximately the same effectiveness against the peste0
Comparator
conventional toxicantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias insulana
Earias insulana · Second interactorgailhampshire from Cradley, Malvern, U.K · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the new tested mixtures of insecticides did not exhibit additional advantages in control of the cotton bollworms comparing to the conventional toxicants, where they showed approximately the same effectiveness against the pest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1680 · show in text ↑
e1

“against cotton bollworms, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) and Earias insulana (Boisd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The new insecticide mixtures were harmful to the associated predators.

Treatment
new tested mixtures of insecticidese0
Interactor
associated predatorse0other
Outcome
harmful to the associated predatorse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the new tested mixtures of insecticides did not exhibit additional advantages in control of the cotton bollworms comparing to the conventional toxicants, where they showed approximately the same effectiveness against the pest and were harmful to the associated predators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1725 · show in text ↑
e1

“against cotton bollworms, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) and Earias insulana (Boisd.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effecthypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cross-resistance could develop after repeated application of these insecticide mixtures.

Treatment
repeated application of these mixturese0
Outcome
cross-resistancee0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“cross-resistance could be developed after repeated application of these mixtures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1817 · show in text ↑

alpha-cypermethrin · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

insecticide · ecology: diversity · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 3 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

insecticide · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.