Paper · 2024 · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment

Insect pollination enhances faba bean yield more than weed removal or fungicide application

Chloé A. Raderschall; Laura G.A. Riggi; Ola Lundin

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Insect pollinators provide important crop pollination services but are declining in response to lack of diverse flower resources and exposure to pesticides. Despite increasing evidence that the benefits of insect pollination for crop production depend on other ecosystem services and crop management practices, investigations have mostly been limited to how pollination benefits are affected by insect pest control and soil fertility levels. Here we used a factorial cage experiment in the field to test how pollination by bumble bees, manual weed removal and fungicide application interactively shape faba bean (Vicia faba) yield components, and how weed removal and fungicide application affect bumble bee foraging behaviour. We found that insect pollination and weed removal increased faba bean yield components mostly additively, with insect pollination being the most important factor to maximise yield. The fungicide treatment did not affect crop yield, probably due to the low fungal pathogen incidence in the experiment, but instead affected bumble bee visitation behaviour. Bumble bees visited flowers of fungicide-sprayed plants more often than fungicide-free plants. This has potential consequences on bee health that should be further assessed. Guidelines on pesticide use should be improved by weighing benefits to agricultural productivity against risks for pollinators according to integrated pest and pollinator management principles. Our results emphasise that insect pollination can be an important factor for crop yield. The additive benefits of insect pollination and weed removal to crop yield indicates that they are crop production factors which can be managed for independently.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect pollination increased faba bean yield components.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
insect pollinatione0
Interactor
insecte0pollinator
Outcome
faba bean yield componentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“insect pollination and weed removal increased faba bean yield components mostly additively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed removal increased faba bean yield components.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
weed removale0
Outcome
faba bean yield componentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“insect pollination and weed removal increased faba bean yield components mostly additively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–832 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect pollination was the most important factor for maximizing faba bean yield.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
most importante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with insect pollination being the most important factor to maximise yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–43 · show in text ↑
t1

“faba bean yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide treatment did not affect faba bean yield.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
fungicide treatmente0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicide treatment did not affect crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–43 · show in text ↑
t1

“faba bean yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bumble bees visited flowers of fungicide-sprayed faba bean plants more often than fungicide-free plants.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
fungicide-sprayede0
Interactor
Bumble beesBombuse0pollinator
Outcome
Bumble bees visited flowerse0
Direction
more oftene0
Comparator
fungicide-free plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bombus
Bombus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marco Almbauer · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bumble bees visited flowers of fungicide-sprayed plants more often than fungicide-free plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–43 · show in text ↑
t1

“faba bean yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–43 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend improving pesticide use guidelines by weighing productivity benefits against pollinator risks.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Outcome
Guidelines on pesticide use should be improvede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Guidelines on pesticide use should be improved by weighing benefits to agricultural productivity against risks for pollinators according to integrated pest and pollinator management principles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–43 · show in text ↑
t1

“faba bean yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–43 · show in text ↑

fungicide · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

pollination · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.