Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Assessing the Impact of Tillage Methods on Soil Moisture Content and Crop Yield in Hungary

Maimela Maxwell Modiba; Caleb Melenya Ocansey; Hanaa Tharwat Mohamed Ibrahim; et al.

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
16
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A decline in rainfall as a source of agricultural water has affected and will continue to affect sustainable crop production globally including in Hungary. Conservation of the greatest water reservoir is important for the sustainable development of agriculture in Hungary. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of the different tillage methods on soil moisture content, grain yield, and root weight of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus) under rainfed conditions. A field study was conducted at the Józsefmajor Experimental and Training Farm (JM) of the Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences near Hatvan. The experiment consisted of six tillage treatments: disking (D, 16 cm), shallow cultivation (SC, 20 cm), no-till (NT), deep cultivation (DC, 25 cm), loosening (L, 45 cm), and plowing (P, 30 cm). Soil moisture content (SMC) was measured monthly, and grain yield and root weight were measured at the end of the cropping period. Our results showed no significant difference in SMC between conservation and conventional tillage methods in 2018. However, in 2021, greater SMC was significantly conserved under NT compared to P. Regarding the sampling date, a significant increase in moisture with time was observed. A significantly lower SMC was observed on 3 June 2019 between L and D. while on the 9 September 2020, SMC significantly differed between P and all the other treatments (D, SC, NT, DC, and L). Interestingly in 2018, SMC was significantly lower at 10–20 cm depth between L and D. Notably the effect of depth on SMC was observed as moisture significantly increased with increasing depth in all tillage treatments. Root weight was greatest at DC (1.54 t ha−1) in 2018 and under L (3.89 t ha−1) in 2021. Similarly, wheat grain yield was greatest at DC (2.48 t ha−1) in 2018, while sunflower yield in 2021 was greatest at L (3.86 t ha−1). It is comprehensible that conservation tillage methods such as L and NT can increase SMC and grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture content did not differ significantly between conservation and conventional tillage in 2018.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)Helianthus annuusTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
conservatione3
Outcome
SMCe3
Direction
no significant differencee3
Qualifier
in 2018e3
Comparator
conventional tillage methodse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–479 · show in text ↑
e3

“Our results showed no significant difference in SMC between conservation and conventional tillage methods in 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2021, soil moisture content was significantly greater under no-till than under plowing.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)Helianthus annuusTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
NTe5
Outcome
SMCe5
Direction
greatere5
Qualifier
in 2021e5
Comparator
Pe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–479 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, in 2021, greater SMC was significantly conserved under NT compared to P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1184 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture content increased significantly with sampling time.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)Helianthus annuusTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
sampling datee6
Outcome
moisturee6
Direction
increasee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–479 · show in text ↑
e6

“Regarding the sampling date, a significant increase in moisture with time was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

On 3 June 2019 soil moisture content was significantly lower under loosening than under disking.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)Helianthus annuusTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
Le7
Outcome
SMCe7
Direction
lowere7
Qualifier
3 June 2019e7
Comparator
De7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–479 · show in text ↑
e7

“A significantly lower SMC was observed on 3 June 2019 between L and D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1343 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

On 9 September 2020 soil moisture content significantly differed between plowing and all other tillage treatments.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)Helianthus annuusTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
Pe2
Outcome
SMCe2
Qualifier
9 September 2020e2
Comparator
all the other treatmentse2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–479 · show in text ↑
e2

“on the 9 September 2020, SMC significantly differed between P and all the other treatments (D, SC, NT, DC, and L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2018 soil moisture content at 10–20 cm depth was significantly lower under loosening than under disking.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)Helianthus annuusTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
Le2
Outcome
SMCe2
Direction
lowere2
Qualifier
10–20 cm depthe2
Comparator
De2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–479 · show in text ↑
e2

“Interestingly in 2018, SMC was significantly lower at 10–20 cm depth between L and D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1550 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture content significantly increased with increasing soil depth in all tillage treatments.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)Helianthus annuusTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
increasing depthe2
Outcome
moisturee2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
in all tillage treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–479 · show in text ↑
e2

“moisture significantly increased with increasing depth in all tillage treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root weight was greatest under deep cultivation (1.54 t ha−1) in 2018.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)Helianthus annuusTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
DCe2
Outcome
Root weighte2
Direction
greateste2
Value
1.54 t ha−1e2
Qualifier
in 2018e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–479 · show in text ↑
e2

“Root weight was greatest at DC (1.54 t ha−1) in 2018 and under L (3.89 t ha−1) in 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root weight was greatest under loosening (3.89 t ha−1) in 2021.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)Helianthus annuusTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
Le2
Outcome
Root weighte2
Direction
greateste2
Value
3.89 t ha−1e2
Qualifier
in 2021e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–479 · show in text ↑
e2

“Root weight was greatest at DC (1.54 t ha−1) in 2018 and under L (3.89 t ha−1) in 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield was greatest under deep cultivation (2.48 t ha−1) in 2018.

Treatment
DCe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
greateste1
Value
2.48 t ha−1e1
Qualifier
in 2018e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat grain yield was greatest at DC (2.48 t ha−1) in 2018, while sunflower yield in 2021 was greatest at L (3.86 t ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1784–1905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower yield in 2021 was greatest under loosening (3.86 t ha−1).

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
Le1
Outcome
sunflower yielde1
Direction
greateste1
Value
3.86 t ha−1e1
Qualifier
in 2021e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat grain yield was greatest at DC (2.48 t ha−1) in 2018, while sunflower yield in 2021 was greatest at L (3.86 t ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1784–1905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret that conservation tillage such as loosening and no-till can increase soil moisture content and grain yield.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)Helianthus annuusTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
conservation tillage methods such as L and NTe2
Outcome
SMC and grain yielde2
Direction
increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–479 · show in text ↑
e2

“conservation tillage methods such as L and NT can increase SMC and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1933–2011 · show in text ↑

tillage · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 32 positive, 16 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

tillage · quality: grain · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.