Paper · 2024 · Bulletin of KSAU

INTENSIFICATION AGENTS USE EFFECT ON SOIL BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY AND PHYTOSANITARY STATE UNDER PEA SOWING

Natal'ya Shuliko; Irina Korchagina; Ol'ga Hamova; et al.

11
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of research is to determine the parameters of biological activity of meadow-chernozem soil and its phytoimmunity in grain-fallow crop rotation at different levels of cultivation intensification and the use of chemicals. The studies were carried out in a long-term (launched in 1973) stationary experiment in grain-fallow crop rotation (fallow – wheat – peas – wheat – barley) under pea crop in the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Omsk Agrarian Scientific Center. In certain periods of 2022 and 2023, with favorable soil moisture, the presence of a significant amount of plant residues in the variant with minimum-zero tillage and the use of complex chemicals, the number of soil micromycetes and nodule bacteria increased to 93.0 thousand and 13.9 million CFU/g, respectively. The total number of soil microflora in the arable layer under different soil cultivation systems for peas without the use of complex chemicals was 51.4–61.2 million CFU/g with a difference of 19.0 % in the ascending series: No-till < moldboard < combined. The use of mineral fertilizers in combination with plant protection products in moldboard and combined tillage did not have a significant effect on the amount of soil microflora, a slight decrease to 17.0 % within the experimental error was noted. In the variants with No-till tillage in combination with intensification products, stimulation of the growth of the number of microorganisms to 22.0 % in relation to the control was noted. On average, according to the soil tillage factor, the greatest development of pea root rot was observed in the No-till variant (3.8 %), a slight decrease (3.2–3.6 %) – in moldboard and combined tillage. The use of plant protection products during the growing season of peas made it possible to reduce the development of root rot by 47.0 % relative to the control, depending on the soil tillage method. With combined treatment, the greatest prevalence of pea root system disease was noted (37.8 %), the least – with No-till treatment (30.8 %). In laboratory conditions, using the wet chamber method, a complex of root rot pathogens was determined, among which fungi of the genus Fusarium spp. prevailed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till combined with intensification products stimulated soil microorganism numbers by 22.0 % relative to the control.

Treatment
No-till tillage in combination with intensification productse1
Outcome
number of microorganismse1
Direction
stimulation of the growthe1
Value
22.0 %e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“UNDER PEA SOWING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the variants with No-till tillage in combination with intensification products, stimulation of the growth of the number of microorganisms to 22.0 % in relation to the control was noted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1491 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant protection products reduced pea root rot development by 47.0 % relative to the control, depending on tillage.

Treatment
plant protection productse2
Outcome
development of root rote2
Direction
reducee2
Value
47.0 %e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“UNDER PEA SOWING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e2

“The use of plant protection products during the growing season of peas made it possible to reduce the development of root rot by 47.0 % relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1855 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest pea root rot development was observed in the No-till variant (3.8 %).

Treatment
No-tille3
Outcome
development of pea root rote3
Value
3.8 %e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“UNDER PEA SOWING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e3

“the greatest development of pea root rot was observed in the No-till variant (3.8 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1627 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With combined treatment the greatest prevalence of pea root system disease was noted (37.8 %).

Treatment
combined treatmente4
Outcome
prevalence of pea root system diseasee4
Value
37.8 %e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“UNDER PEA SOWING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e4

“With combined treatment, the greatest prevalence of pea root system disease was noted (37.8 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1895–1989 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The least prevalence of pea root system disease was with No-till treatment (30.8 %).

Treatment
No-till treatmente5
Outcome
prevalence of pea root system diseasee4
Value
30.8 %e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“UNDER PEA SOWING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e4

“With combined treatment, the greatest prevalence of pea root system disease was noted (37.8 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1895–1989 · show in text ↑
e5

“the least – with No-till treatment (30.8 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1991–2034 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total soil microflora in the arable layer under the pea soil cultivation systems was 51.4–61.2 million CFU/g.

Treatment
different soil cultivation systemse6
Outcome
total number of soil microflorae6
Value
51.4–61.2 million CFU/ge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“UNDER PEA SOWING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e6

“The total number of soil microflora in the arable layer under different soil cultivation systems for peas without the use of complex chemicals was 51.4–61.2 million CFU/g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–970 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total soil microflora differed by 19.0 % across No-till, moldboard and combined tillage in ascending order.

Outcome
total number of soil microflorae6
Value
19.0 %e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“UNDER PEA SOWING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e6

“The total number of soil microflora in the arable layer under different soil cultivation systems for peas without the use of complex chemicals was 51.4–61.2 million CFU/g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–970 · show in text ↑
e7

“with a difference of 19.0 % in the ascending series: No-till < moldboard < combined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizers with plant protection products in moldboard and combined tillage did not significantly affect soil microflora; a slight decrease of 17.0 % was within experimental error.

Treatment
mineral fertilizers in combination with plant protection productse1
Outcome
amount of soil microflorae1
Direction
did not have a significant effecte1
Value
17.0 %e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“UNDER PEA SOWING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of mineral fertilizers in combination with plant protection products in moldboard and combined tillage did not have a significant effect on the amount of soil microflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1233 · show in text ↑
e2

“a slight decrease to 17.0 % within the experimental error was noted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1302 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In laboratory tests a complex of root rot pathogens was determined, among which Fusarium spp. prevailed.

Interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariume2pathogen
Outcome
complex of root rot pathogense2
Setting
laboratory conditionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“UNDER PEA SOWING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e2

“a complex of root rot pathogens was determined, among which fungi of the genus Fusarium spp. prevailed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2092–2194 · show in text ↑
e3

“In laboratory conditions, using the wet chamber method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2036–2090 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil micromycetes increased to 93.0 thousand CFU/g in the minimum-zero tillage variant with complex chemicals.

Treatment
minimum-zero tillage and the use of complex chemicalse3
Outcome
number of soil micromycetese2
Value
93.0 thousande2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“UNDER PEA SOWING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e2

“the number of soil micromycetes and nodule bacteria increased to 93.0 thousand and 13.9 million CFU/g, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–798 · show in text ↑
e3

“the variant with minimum-zero tillage and the use of complex chemicals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–681 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodule bacteria increased to 13.9 million CFU/g in the same minimum-zero tillage variant with complex chemicals.

Treatment
minimum-zero tillage and the use of complex chemicalse3
Outcome
nodule bacteriae2
Value
13.9 million CFU/ge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“UNDER PEA SOWING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 · show in text ↑
e2

“the number of soil micromycetes and nodule bacteria increased to 93.0 thousand and 13.9 million CFU/g, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–798 · show in text ↑
e3

“the variant with minimum-zero tillage and the use of complex chemicals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–681 · show in text ↑