Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Engineering & Technology

Study of Various Organic Mulch Sheet Compositions Usage towards The Growth and Yield of Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea Var Botrytis, L.)

Aniek Aniek; Aniek Hasanah; Hartawati .

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The production decrease and the imported commodity increase were due to the low quantity and quality of cauliflower, it was also caused by pre-harvest factors including cultivation technique that mostly used non-biodegradable plastic mulch. Functionally, the seasonal organic mulch was less effective and thus it needed engineering technology in the form of organic mulch sheet. The selection of organic materials (water hyacinth, banana pseudostem and tannery waste) which were used as mulches have met the eco-friendly concept. This research was aimed to study the effect of various organic mulch sheet compositions usage towards the growth and yield of cauliflower. The result showed that the use of organic mulch sheet was significant compared to the treatment without using mulch with the yield increase by 72.18%. However, the results were not significantly different in various compositions and black silver plastic mulch (BSPM) treatments with the growth and yield as the observable variables. The temperature of organic sheet mulch was between 25.10C – 29.10C; the soil temperature was between 25.9oC – 34.6oC; the soil humidity was between 66.1 - 78.2. The intensity of the light received was between 47,844.3 – 52,735 lux, meanwhile the light reflected was between 7,196.79 – 8,451.18 lux.Â

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic mulch sheet use increased cauliflower yield by 72.18% compared with no mulch.

Treatment
use of organic mulch sheete2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
72.18%e2
Comparator
the treatment without using mulche2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of various organic mulch sheet compositions usage towards the growth and yield of cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–667 · show in text ↑
e2

“The result showed that the use of organic mulch sheet was significant compared to the treatment without using mulch with the yield increase by 72.18%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and yield did not differ significantly among mulch compositions and black silver plastic mulch.

Treatment
various compositionse3
Outcome
growth and yielde3
Direction
not significantly differente3
Comparator
black silver plastic mulch (BSPM)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of various organic mulch sheet compositions usage towards the growth and yield of cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–667 · show in text ↑
e3

“the results were not significantly different in various compositions and black silver plastic mulch (BSPM) treatments with the growth and yield as the observable variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–1000 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature of the organic sheet mulch was 25.10–29.10 °C.

Outcome
temperaturee4
Value
25.10C – 29.10Ce4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of various organic mulch sheet compositions usage towards the growth and yield of cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–667 · show in text ↑
e4

“The temperature of organic sheet mulch was between 25.10C – 29.10C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1068 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil temperature under the organic sheets was 25.9–34.6 °C.

Outcome
soil temperaturee5
Value
25.9oC – 34.6oCe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of various organic mulch sheet compositions usage towards the growth and yield of cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–667 · show in text ↑
e5

“the soil temperature was between 25.9oC – 34.6oC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil humidity under the organic sheets was 66.1–78.2.

Outcome
soil humiditye6
Value
66.1 - 78.2e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of various organic mulch sheet compositions usage towards the growth and yield of cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–667 · show in text ↑
e6

“the soil humidity was between 66.1 - 78.2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensity of the light received under the organic sheets was 47,844.3–52,735 lux.

Outcome
intensity of the light receivede7
Value
47,844.3 – 52,735 luxe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of various organic mulch sheet compositions usage towards the growth and yield of cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–667 · show in text ↑
e7

“The intensity of the light received was between 47,844.3 – 52,735 lux”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1232 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light reflected from the organic sheets was 7,196.79–8,451.18 lux.

Outcome
light reflectede2
Value
7,196.79 – 8,451.18 luxe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of various organic mulch sheet compositions usage towards the growth and yield of cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–667 · show in text ↑
e2

“the light reflected was between 7,196.79 – 8,451.18 lux”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1299 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.