Paper · 2025 · ACS Omega

Integrated Nutrient Management Enhances the Growth and Yield of Cauliflower ( Brassica oleracea var. botrytis ) in Calcareous Soil: A Field Experiment with Mineral, Organic, and Biofertilizers

Mohammed Ranjous; Akram Al-Balkhi; Areej Al-Khader; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Calcareous soil, which covers large areas of Syria and other arid regions, is characterized by high pH, elevated calcium carbonate content, and low availability of essential nutrients, posing significant constraints to vegetable production. Although integrated nutrient management combining mineral, organic, and biofertilizers has shown promise in improving crop performance, field-based evidence from calcareous soil in Syria remains limited. This study aimed to identify the most efficient fertilization strategy for cauliflower ( Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis ) in calcareous soil. We hypothesized that a balanced mixture of mineral, organic, and biofertilizers would enhance nutrient availability and crop performance more effectively than single-fertilizer applications. For this, a field experiment was conducted during the 2024–2025 growing season (October–February) at the Shabaa Research Station using a randomized complete block design with 13 fertilization treatments and three replicates. At the end of the experimental period, soil and plant macronutrients and cauliflower growth parameters were measured. Results demonstrated that the treatment combining 50% mineral fertilizer, 25% fermented cow manure, and 25% biofertilizer significantly ( p <0.05) enhanced the plant height (51.0 cm), head diameter (31.24 cm), and total yield (43.35 tons ha –1 ), representing a 44.5% increase over the unfertilized control and outperforming mineral fertilization alone. Treatments with a high share of mineral fertilizers (75% mineral fertilizer + 25% organic fertilizer) increased the plant nutrient content but were less effective than balanced mixtures, in terms of crop yield. Moreover, individual fertilizer application resulted in a significant reduction in plant growth compared to the use of mixtures. This study highlights the agronomic and environmental benefits of integrated fertilization strategies in nutrient-deficient calcareous soil, including improved nutrient use efficiency, reduced chemical fertilizer input, and enhanced soil properties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The balanced fertilizer mixture significantly increased cauliflower height to 51.0 cm.

Treatment
50% mineral fertilizer, 25% fermented cow manure, and 25% biofertilizere0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
51.0 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment combining 50% mineral fertilizer, 25% fermented cow manure, and 25% biofertilizer significantly ( p <0.05) enhanced the plant height (51.0 cm), head diameter (31.24 cm), and total yield (43.35 tons ha –1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1421 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The balanced fertilizer mixture significantly increased cauliflower head diameter to 31.24 cm.

Treatment
50% mineral fertilizer, 25% fermented cow manure, and 25% biofertilizere0
Outcome
head diametere0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
31.24 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment combining 50% mineral fertilizer, 25% fermented cow manure, and 25% biofertilizer significantly ( p <0.05) enhanced the plant height (51.0 cm), head diameter (31.24 cm), and total yield (43.35 tons ha –1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1421 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The balanced fertilizer mixture raised cauliflower yield to 43.35 tons ha –1, 44.5% above the unfertilized control and above mineral fertilizer alone.

Treatment
50% mineral fertilizer, 25% fermented cow manure, and 25% biofertilizere0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
43.35 tons ha –1e0
Qualifier
44.5%e0
Comparator
unfertilized controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment combining 50% mineral fertilizer, 25% fermented cow manure, and 25% biofertilizer significantly ( p <0.05) enhanced the plant height (51.0 cm), head diameter (31.24 cm), and total yield (43.35 tons ha –1 ), representing a 44.5% increase over the unfertilized control and outperforming mineral fertilization alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1528 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High mineral fertilizer share increased cauliflower nutrient content.

Treatment
75% mineral fertilizer + 25% organic fertilizere0
Outcome
plant nutrient contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments with a high share of mineral fertilizers (75% mineral fertilizer + 25% organic fertilizer) increased the plant nutrient content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1530–1668 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High mineral fertilizer share was less effective for cauliflower yield than balanced mixtures.

Treatment
75% mineral fertilizer + 25% organic fertilizere0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
less effectivee0
Comparator
balanced mixturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments with a high share of mineral fertilizers (75% mineral fertilizer + 25% organic fertilizer) increased the plant nutrient content but were less effective than balanced mixtures, in terms of crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1530–1739 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual fertilizer applications significantly reduced cauliflower growth compared with mixtures.

Treatment
individual fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
the use of mixturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“individual fertilizer application resulted in a significant reduction in plant growth compared to the use of mixtures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1868 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude integrated fertilization improves nutrient use efficiency, reduces chemical fertilizer input and enhances soil properties.

Outcome
improved nutrient use efficiency, reduced chemical fertilizer input, and enhanced soil propertiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integrated fertilization strategies in nutrient-deficient calcareous soil, including improved nutrient use efficiency, reduced chemical fertilizer input, and enhanced soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1936–2118 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑

organic · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

processing · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

processing · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

organic · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

inoculation · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

58 papers: 49 positive, 9 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

inoculation · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 62 positive, 4 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

146 papers: 127 positive, 19 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

142 papers more in this group

See all 146 papers →

fertilization · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

264 papers: 240 positive, 24 negative or no effect

239 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

260 papers more in this group

See all 264 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.