Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Integrated Nitrogen Management on Macronutrient Availability under Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.)

Harmandeep Singh Chahal; Satnam Singh; Iqbal Singh Dhillon; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of integrated nitrogen management (INM) on yield and soil properties under cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.) cv. Nuzi Snow White at Students’ Research Farm, P.G. Department of Agriculture, Khalsa College, Amritsar during Rabi season of 2017-18. For INM studies, organic manures viz., vermicompost (VC), farmyard manure (FYM) and recommended dose of nitrogenous fertilizers (RDNF) was employed. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with eight treatments comprised of T1: Control, T2: 100 % RDF, T3: 75% RDNF + 25% N (VC), T4: 50% RDNF + 50% N (VC), T5: 75% RDNF + 25% N (FYM), T6: 50% RDNF + 50% N (FYM), T7: 50% RDNF + 25% N (VC) + 25% N (FYM), T8: 75% RDNF + 12.5% N (VC) + 12.5% N (FYM). The availability of macro and micronutrients were significantly improved by integrated use of nutrient sources. Maximum values of available N, P, K and S were observed to be 255.90 kg ha-1, 25.18 kg ha-1, 308.65 kg ha-1 and 11.97 kg ha-1, respectively in a treatment where 50% recommended nitrogen was supplied through VC (T4). Similarly, available micronutrients (Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn) were also found highest in treatment T4. Exchangeable Ca and Mg in soil varied from 58.47 to 33.47 mg kg-1 and 6.73 to 11.87 mg kg-1, respectively. Values regarding plant growth parameters, yield as well as nutrient uptake were noticed highest in T2 (100% NPK through inorganic fertilizers) which was at par with T3 in which 25% N was substituted through VC. Integrated application of organic inputs along with 25% reduced chemical fertilizers proved to enhance the soil health while sustaining crop productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient sources significantly improved macro- and micronutrient availability.

Treatment
integrated use of nutrient sourcese0
Outcome
availability of macro and micronutrientse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The availability of macro and micronutrients were significantly improved by integrated use of nutrient sources.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–875 · show in text ↑
e1

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T4 had maximum available soil nitrogen of 255.90 kg ha-1.

Treatment
50% recommended nitrogen was supplied through VC (T4)e0
Outcome
available Ne0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
255.90 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum values of available N, P, K and S were observed to be 255.90 kg ha-1, 25.18 kg ha-1, 308.65 kg ha-1 and 11.97 kg ha-1, respectively in a treatment where 50% recommended nitrogen was supplied through VC (T4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1091 · show in text ↑
e1

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T4 had maximum available soil phosphorus of 25.18 kg ha-1.

Treatment
50% recommended nitrogen was supplied through VC (T4)e0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
25.18 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum values of available N, P, K and S were observed to be 255.90 kg ha-1, 25.18 kg ha-1, 308.65 kg ha-1 and 11.97 kg ha-1, respectively in a treatment where 50% recommended nitrogen was supplied through VC (T4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1091 · show in text ↑
e1

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T4 had maximum available soil potassium of 308.65 kg ha-1.

Treatment
50% recommended nitrogen was supplied through VC (T4)e0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
308.65 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum values of available N, P, K and S were observed to be 255.90 kg ha-1, 25.18 kg ha-1, 308.65 kg ha-1 and 11.97 kg ha-1, respectively in a treatment where 50% recommended nitrogen was supplied through VC (T4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1091 · show in text ↑
e1

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T4 had maximum available soil sulfur of 11.97 kg ha-1.

Treatment
50% recommended nitrogen was supplied through VC (T4)e0
Outcome
Se0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
11.97 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum values of available N, P, K and S were observed to be 255.90 kg ha-1, 25.18 kg ha-1, 308.65 kg ha-1 and 11.97 kg ha-1, respectively in a treatment where 50% recommended nitrogen was supplied through VC (T4).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1091 · show in text ↑
e1

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T4 had the highest available Zn, Fe, Cu, and Mn.

Treatment
treatment T4e0
Outcome
available micronutrients (Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn)e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available micronutrients (Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn) were also found highest in treatment T4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1187 · show in text ↑
e1

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–158 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchangeable soil calcium ranged from 58.47 to 33.47 mg kg-1.

Outcome
Exchangeable Cae0
Value
58.47 to 33.47 mg kg-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exchangeable Ca and Mg in soil varied from 58.47 to 33.47 mg kg-1 and 6.73 to 11.87 mg kg-1, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1295 · show in text ↑
e1

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–158 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchangeable soil magnesium ranged from 6.73 to 11.87 mg kg-1.

Outcome
Mge0
Value
6.73 to 11.87 mg kg-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exchangeable Ca and Mg in soil varied from 58.47 to 33.47 mg kg-1 and 6.73 to 11.87 mg kg-1, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1295 · show in text ↑
e1

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 had the highest plant growth parameters, yield, and nutrient uptake, at par with T3.

Treatment
T2 (100% NPK through inorganic fertilizers)e0
Outcome
plant growth parameters, yield as well as nutrient uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
at par with T3e0
Comparator
T3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Values regarding plant growth parameters, yield as well as nutrient uptake were noticed highest in T2 (100% NPK through inorganic fertilizers) which was at par with T3 in which 25% N was substituted through VC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1506 · show in text ↑
e1

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–158 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that organic inputs with 25% less chemical fertilizer enhanced soil health while maintaining crop productivity.

Outcome
Integrated application of organic inputs along with 25% reduced chemical fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integrated application of organic inputs along with 25% reduced chemical fertilizers proved to enhance the soil health while sustaining crop productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1661 · show in text ↑
e1

“cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–158 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · soil: chemistry · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 35 positive, 11 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

146 papers: 127 positive, 19 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

142 papers more in this group

See all 146 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

496 papers: 445 positive, 51 negative or no effect

444 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

492 papers more in this group

See all 496 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.