Paper · 2005 · HortScience

Cabbage Yield and Glucosinolate Concentrations as Affected by Nitrogen and Sulfur Fertility

C.J. Rosen; V.A. Fritz; G.M. Gardner; et al.

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
87
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Glucosinolates are a class of nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) containing compounds shown to have cancer-preventing properties in animal models and widely found in cruciferous plants. The overall objective of this study was to determine whether N and S fertility affects glucosinolate concentrations in cabbage ( Brassica oleracea L. Capitata group). Field studies on a sandy soil low in available N and S were conducted over a 2-year period with both green (`Grand Slam') and red (`Vorox') cabbage cultivars. Treatments evaluated each year were the interactive effects of N (125 and 250 kg·ha –1 ) and S (0, and 110 kg·ha –1 ) fertilizer application. Yield of both cabbage cultivars increased with increasing N and S in the second year of the study, but not in the first. Tissue N concentrations in heads at harvest increased with N application and tissue S concentrations increased with S application. When S was not applied, tissue S decreased significantly as N rate increased, while N rate had no effect on tissue S concentrations when S was applied. The dominant glucosinolate detected in both cabbage cultivars was glucobrassicin, with indole forms accounting for about 80% of the total glucosinolates regardless of treatment. Tissue N was negatively correlated and tissue S and S to N ratio were positively correlated with total glucosinolate concentration, although all correlations were generally weak ( r 2 < 0.5). Total glucosinolates and glucobrassicin concentrations were maximized in both cultivars at the low N and high S application rates. Except for sinigrin in one of the 2 years, all glucosinolates detected were higher in Vorox than in `Grand Slam'. Based on these results, glucosinolates in cabbage can be manipulated by cultural management practices as well as genetics.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green Grand Slam cabbage yield increased with N and S in year two, but not year one.

Material
Grand Slame0e1
Treatment
increasing N and Se0e1
Outcome
Yielde0e1
Direction
increasede0e1
Qualifier
second year of the study, but not in the firste0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of both cabbage cultivars increased with increasing N and S in the second year of the study, but not in the first.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–767 · show in text ↑
e1

“green (`Grand Slam') and red (`Vorox') cabbage cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red Vorox cabbage yield increased with N and S in year two, but not year one.

Material
Voroxe0e1
Treatment
increasing N and Se0e1
Outcome
Yielde0e1
Direction
increasede0e1
Qualifier
second year of the study, but not in the firste0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of both cabbage cultivars increased with increasing N and S in the second year of the study, but not in the first.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–767 · show in text ↑
e1

“green (`Grand Slam') and red (`Vorox') cabbage cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Head tissue N increased with N application.

Treatment
N applicatione0t0
Outcome
Tissue N concentrations in heads at harveste0t0
Direction
increasede0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tissue N concentrations in heads at harvest increased with N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Head tissue S increased with S application.

Treatment
S applicatione0t0
Outcome
tissue S concentrationse0t0
Direction
increasede0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tissue S concentrations increased with S application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Without S fertilizer, tissue S decreased significantly as N rate rose.

Treatment
N ratee0t0
Outcome
tissue Se0t0
Direction
decreasede0t0
Qualifier
S was not appliede0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When S was not applied, tissue S decreased significantly as N rate increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With S fertilizer, N rate had no effect on tissue S.

Treatment
N ratee0t0
Outcome
tissue S concentrationse0t0
Direction
no effecte0t0
Qualifier
S was appliede0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N rate had no effect on tissue S concentrations when S was applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucobrassicin was the dominant glucosinolate in both cultivars.

Outcome
dominant glucosinolate detected in both cabbage cultivars was glucobrassicine0t0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dominant glucosinolate detected in both cabbage cultivars was glucobrassicin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indole forms made up about 80% of total glucosinolates regardless of treatment.

Outcome
indole forms accounting for about 80% of the total glucosinolatese0t0
Value
about 80%e0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indole forms accounting for about 80% of the total glucosinolates regardless of treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue N was negatively correlated with total glucosinolate concentration.

Compound
Tissue Ne0t0
Outcome
total glucosinolate concentratione0t0
Direction
negativelye0t0
Qualifier
generally weake0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tissue N was negatively correlated and tissue S and S to N ratio were positively correlated with total glucosinolate concentration, although all correlations were generally weak ( r 2 < 0.5).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1420 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue S was positively correlated with total glucosinolate concentration.

Compound
tissue Se0t0
Outcome
total glucosinolate concentratione0t0
Direction
positivelye0t0
Qualifier
generally weake0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tissue N was negatively correlated and tissue S and S to N ratio were positively correlated with total glucosinolate concentration, although all correlations were generally weak ( r 2 < 0.5).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1420 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S to N ratio was positively correlated with total glucosinolate concentration.

Compound
S to N ratioe0t0
Outcome
total glucosinolate concentratione0t0
Direction
positivelye0t0
Qualifier
generally weake0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tissue N was negatively correlated and tissue S and S to N ratio were positively correlated with total glucosinolate concentration, although all correlations were generally weak ( r 2 < 0.5).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1420 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low N and high S maximized total glucosinolates in both cultivars.

Treatment
low N and high S application ratese0t0
Outcome
Total glucosinolatese0t0
Direction
maximizede0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total glucosinolates and glucobrassicin concentrations were maximized in both cultivars at the low N and high S application rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low N and high S maximized glucobrassicin in both cultivars.

Treatment
low N and high S application ratese0t0
Outcome
glucobrassicin concentrationse0t0
Direction
maximizede0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total glucosinolates and glucobrassicin concentrations were maximized in both cultivars at the low N and high S application rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucosinolates other than sinigrin were higher in Vorox than Grand Slam.

Material
Voroxe0t0
Outcome
all glucosinolates detectede0t0
Direction
highere0t0
Qualifier
Except for sinigrin in one of the 2 yearse0t0
Comparator
Grand Slame0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Except for sinigrin in one of the 2 years, all glucosinolates detected were higher in Vorox than in `Grand Slam'.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded cultural practice and genetics can manipulate cabbage glucosinolates.

Outcome
glucosinolates in cabbage can be manipulated by cultural management practices as well as geneticse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glucosinolates in cabbage can be manipulated by cultural management practices as well as genetics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1788 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

sulfur atom · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

nitrogen · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 35 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.