Abstract
The field experiment was carried out at the central research farm in the Department of Soil Science and Chemistry, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj during Rabi season 2023-24. The soil texture in the experimental region was sandy loam. The design was set up using randomized block design, with two levels of sulphur (50 and 100%), Rhizobium, and NPK (20:60:40) at different levels. The treatment T9 (@100% NPKS +@100% Rhizobium+ 100% Sulphur) gave the best results in terms of plant height, number of pods plant-1, and total Field Pea yield. It also showed a slight decrease in pH, bulk density, and particle density; however, there was a significant increase in pore space, water holding capacity, EC, organic carbon, available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, as well as plant growth and yield attributes. There was no discernible difference in the growth and production of Field Pea under control. The use of Biofertilizer, as well as their blend with complete NPK and S, significantly increased the characteristics of growth and total yield attributes of Field Pea.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
T9 gave the best field pea height, pod number and yield.
- Taxon
- Field Peae0
- Treatment
- T9 (@100% NPKS +@100% Rhizobium+ 100% Sulphur)e0
- Outcome
- plant height, number of pods plant-1, and total Field Pea yielde0
- Direction
- beste0
RhizobiumNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatment T9 (@100% NPKS +@100% Rhizobium+ 100% Sulphur) gave the best results in terms of plant height, number of pods plant-1, and total Field Pea yield”
Claim · model-written summary
T9 slightly lowered soil pH, bulk density and particle density.
Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“It also showed a slight decrease in pH, bulk density, and particle density”
Claim · model-written summary
T9 significantly increased soil pore space, water holding capacity and EC.
Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“there was a significant increase in pore space, water holding capacity, EC, organic carbon, available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, as well as plant growth and yield attributes”
Claim · model-written summary
T9 significantly increased soil organic carbon and available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium.
Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“there was a significant increase in pore space, water holding capacity, EC, organic carbon, available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, as well as plant growth and yield attributes”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizer with complete nutrients increased field pea growth and yield attributes.
- Taxon
- Field Peae0
- Treatment
- Biofertilizere0
- Outcome
- growth and total yield attributese0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The use of Biofertilizer, as well as their blend with complete NPK and S, significantly increased the characteristics of growth and total yield attributes of Field Pea”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →sulfur atom · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →inoculation · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ
107 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
123 papers more in this group
See all 127 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.