Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

IoT-Integrated drip irrigation and fertigation for improving root and physiological metrics in aerobic rice

DVS Akshay; RM Kumar; S Prathibha Sree; et al.

18
claims
37
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In the kharif and rabi of 2022-2023 and 2023-2024, a field experiment was carried out at the Indian Institute of Rice Research (ICAR) in Hyderabad to analyze the effect of different IoT based irrigation and fertigation management practices on root and physiological parameters of aerobic rice. The experiment was conducted in a strip plot design with 4 horizontal plots and 3 vertical plots, all of which were randomly allocated and replicated three times. Nitrogen management practices (4) which include N1 - Control (no nitrogen), N2 - 100% RDN (100% inorganic), N3 - 100% RDN (50% inorganic & 50% organic) and N4 - 125% RDN (100% inorganic) were the Horizontal treatments. Irrigation management practices (3) which include I1 - Saturation, I2 - 10% DASM (Depletion of Available Soil Moisture) and I3 - 20% DASM were Vertical treatments. Organic nutrient sources are given as soil application and the inorganic sources are applied through fertigation. Sensor based (IoT) irrigation scheduling was done. Nitrogen application, particularly N4 (125% RDN with 100% inorganic) consistently showed the highest physiological parameters i.e., leaf area index (4.36 in kharif season and 4.29 in rabi season) and chlorophyll content (37.7 and 31.5 respectively in kharif and rabi seasons) followed by N2 and N3, while saturation irrigation (I1) resulted in significantly higher leaf area index (4.23 during kharif season and 4.16 during rabi season) and chlorophyll content (36.5 in kharif; 31.5 in rabi) compared to deficit irrigation methods. N4 consistently showed the highest root length (21.3 cm in kharif; 20.3 cm in rabi) and density (0.388 g cm-3 in kharif; 0.325 g cm-3 in rabi), followed by N2 and N3, while saturation (I1) consistently exhibited higher root length (19.7 cm in kharif; 18.9 cm in rabi) and density (0.375 g cm-3 in kharif; 0.322 g cm-3 in rabi) compared to other irrigation methods. Higher dosage and recommended dosage of nitrogen fertigation were found to have statistically similar root development and physiological parameters. IoT based irrigation at 10% DASM was found to be on par with saturation for root and physiological parameters of aerobic rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N4 gave the highest leaf area index in kharif.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
N4 (125% RDN with 100% inorganic)e0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.36e0
Qualifier
kharif seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“N4 (125% RDN with 100% inorganic) consistently showed the highest physiological parameters i.e., leaf area index (4.36 in kharif season and 4.29 in rabi season)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N4 gave the highest leaf area index in rabi.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
N4 (125% RDN with 100% inorganic)e0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.29e0
Qualifier
rabi seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“N4 (125% RDN with 100% inorganic) consistently showed the highest physiological parameters i.e., leaf area index (4.36 in kharif season and 4.29 in rabi season)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N4 gave the highest chlorophyll content in kharif.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
N4 (125% RDN with 100% inorganic)e1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
higheste1
Value
37.7e0
Qualifier
kharife0
Comparator
N2 and N3e0

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll content (37.7 and 31.5 respectively in kharif and rabi seasons) followed by N2 and N3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1302 · show in text ↑
e1

“N4 (125% RDN with 100% inorganic) consistently showed the highest physiological parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N4 gave the highest chlorophyll content in rabi.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
N4 (125% RDN with 100% inorganic)e1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
higheste1
Value
31.5e0
Qualifier
rabie0
Comparator
N2 and N3e0

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll content (37.7 and 31.5 respectively in kharif and rabi seasons) followed by N2 and N3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1302 · show in text ↑
e1

“N4 (125% RDN with 100% inorganic) consistently showed the highest physiological parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saturation irrigation produced higher leaf area index than deficit irrigation in kharif.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
saturation irrigation (I1)e0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.23e0
Qualifier
kharif seasone0
Comparator
deficit irrigation methodse0

Verbatim

e0

“saturation irrigation (I1) resulted in significantly higher leaf area index (4.23 during kharif season and 4.16 during rabi season) and chlorophyll content (36.5 in kharif; 31.5 in rabi) compared to deficit irrigation methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1535 · show in text ↑
t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saturation irrigation produced higher leaf area index than deficit irrigation in rabi.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
saturation irrigation (I1)e0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.16e0
Qualifier
rabi seasone0
Comparator
deficit irrigation methodse0

Verbatim

e0

“saturation irrigation (I1) resulted in significantly higher leaf area index (4.23 during kharif season and 4.16 during rabi season) and chlorophyll content (36.5 in kharif; 31.5 in rabi) compared to deficit irrigation methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1535 · show in text ↑
t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saturation irrigation produced higher chlorophyll content in kharif.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
saturation irrigation (I1)e0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
36.5e0
Qualifier
kharife0
Comparator
deficit irrigation methodse0

Verbatim

e0

“saturation irrigation (I1) resulted in significantly higher leaf area index (4.23 during kharif season and 4.16 during rabi season) and chlorophyll content (36.5 in kharif; 31.5 in rabi) compared to deficit irrigation methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1535 · show in text ↑
t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saturation irrigation produced higher chlorophyll content in rabi.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
saturation irrigation (I1)e0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
31.5e0
Qualifier
rabie0
Comparator
deficit irrigation methodse0

Verbatim

e0

“saturation irrigation (I1) resulted in significantly higher leaf area index (4.23 during kharif season and 4.16 during rabi season) and chlorophyll content (36.5 in kharif; 31.5 in rabi) compared to deficit irrigation methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1535 · show in text ↑
t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N4 gave the highest root length in kharif.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
N4e0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
21.3 cme0
Qualifier
kharife0
Comparator
N2 and N3e0

Verbatim

e0

“N4 consistently showed the highest root length (21.3 cm in kharif; 20.3 cm in rabi) and density (0.388 g cm-3 in kharif; 0.325 g cm-3 in rabi), followed by N2 and N3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1702 · show in text ↑
t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N4 gave the highest root length in rabi.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
N4e0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
20.3 cme0
Qualifier
rabie0
Comparator
N2 and N3e0

Verbatim

e0

“N4 consistently showed the highest root length (21.3 cm in kharif; 20.3 cm in rabi) and density (0.388 g cm-3 in kharif; 0.325 g cm-3 in rabi), followed by N2 and N3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1702 · show in text ↑
t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N4 gave the highest root density in kharif.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
N4e0
Outcome
densitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.388 g cm-3e0
Qualifier
kharife0
Comparator
N2 and N3e0

Verbatim

e0

“N4 consistently showed the highest root length (21.3 cm in kharif; 20.3 cm in rabi) and density (0.388 g cm-3 in kharif; 0.325 g cm-3 in rabi), followed by N2 and N3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1702 · show in text ↑
t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N4 gave the highest root density in rabi.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
N4e0
Outcome
densitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.325 g cm-3e0
Qualifier
rabie0
Comparator
N2 and N3e0

Verbatim

e0

“N4 consistently showed the highest root length (21.3 cm in kharif; 20.3 cm in rabi) and density (0.388 g cm-3 in kharif; 0.325 g cm-3 in rabi), followed by N2 and N3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1702 · show in text ↑
t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saturation irrigation gave higher root length in kharif.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
saturation (I1)e0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
highere0
Value
19.7 cme0
Qualifier
kharife0
Comparator
other irrigation methodse0

Verbatim

e0

“saturation (I1) consistently exhibited higher root length (19.7 cm in kharif; 18.9 cm in rabi) and density (0.375 g cm-3 in kharif; 0.322 g cm-3 in rabi) compared to other irrigation methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1900 · show in text ↑
t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saturation irrigation gave higher root length in rabi.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
saturation (I1)e0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
highere0
Value
18.9 cme0
Qualifier
rabie0
Comparator
other irrigation methodse0

Verbatim

e0

“saturation (I1) consistently exhibited higher root length (19.7 cm in kharif; 18.9 cm in rabi) and density (0.375 g cm-3 in kharif; 0.322 g cm-3 in rabi) compared to other irrigation methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1900 · show in text ↑
t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saturation irrigation gave higher root density in kharif.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
saturation (I1)e0
Outcome
densitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.375 g cm-3e0
Qualifier
kharife0
Comparator
other irrigation methodse0

Verbatim

e0

“saturation (I1) consistently exhibited higher root length (19.7 cm in kharif; 18.9 cm in rabi) and density (0.375 g cm-3 in kharif; 0.322 g cm-3 in rabi) compared to other irrigation methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1900 · show in text ↑
t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saturation irrigation gave higher root density in rabi.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
saturation (I1)e0
Outcome
densitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.322 g cm-3e0
Qualifier
rabie0
Comparator
other irrigation methodse0

Verbatim

e0

“saturation (I1) consistently exhibited higher root length (19.7 cm in kharif; 18.9 cm in rabi) and density (0.375 g cm-3 in kharif; 0.322 g cm-3 in rabi) compared to other irrigation methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1900 · show in text ↑
t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher and recommended nitrogen fertigation dosages had statistically similar root and physiological parameters.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
Higher dosagee0
Outcome
root development and physiological parameterse0
Direction
statistically similare0
Comparator
recommended dosage of nitrogen fertigatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Higher dosage and recommended dosage of nitrogen fertigation were found to have statistically similar root development and physiological parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1902–2049 · show in text ↑
t0

“aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IoT irrigation at 10% DASM was on par with saturation for root and physiological parameters.

Taxon
aerobic ricee0
Treatment
IoT based irrigation at 10% DASMe0
Outcome
root and physiological parameterse0
Direction
on pare0
Comparator
saturatione0

Verbatim

e0

“IoT based irrigation at 10% DASM was found to be on par with saturation for root and physiological parameters of aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2051–2176 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 21 positive, 8 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.