Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during the Kharif seasons of 2022 and 2023 at the research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India, to evaluate the yield losses caused by a pest complex on cowpea. The pooled study of both year revealed that the highest total avoidable loss was observed in the untreated control (NP) at 40.90%, followed by the PVS treatment (imidacloprid 17.8 SL) at 24.45%. The lowest avoidable loss was recorded in the PRS treatment (chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC) at 13.49%. The treatment PTS (imidacloprid 17.8 SL and chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC) showed the highest increase in cowpea seed yield over control, with a 69.24% increase, followed by PRS with a 46.29% increase. Conversely, the PVS treatment exhibited the lowest yield increase at 27.83%. Maximum yield of 1049.70 kg ha⁻¹ was achieved with the PTS treatment, while the lowest 620.40 kg ha⁻¹ in the NP treatment. The PVS and PRS treatments yielded 793.10 kg ha⁻¹ and 908.20 kg ha⁻¹, respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
In the untreated control (NP), total avoidable loss in cowpea was the highest, at 40.90%.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Interactor
- pest complexe0pest
- Outcome
- total avoidable losse1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 40.90%e1
- Qualifier
- untreated control (NP)e1
- Setting
- research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Indiae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“to evaluate the yield losses caused by a pest complex on cowpea”
e1“the highest total avoidable loss was observed in the untreated control (NP) at 40.90%, followed by the PVS treatment (imidacloprid 17.8 SL) at 24.45%”
e2“at the research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India”
Claim · model-written summary
The PVS treatment (imidacloprid 17.8 SL) had 24.45% total avoidable loss, lower than the untreated control.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0
- Treatment
- PVS treatment (imidacloprid 17.8 SL)e1
- Interactor
- pest complexe0pest
- Outcome
- total avoidable losse1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 24.45%e1
- Comparator
- untreated control (NP)e1
- Setting
- research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Indiae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“to evaluate the yield losses caused by a pest complex on cowpea”
e1“the highest total avoidable loss was observed in the untreated control (NP) at 40.90%, followed by the PVS treatment (imidacloprid 17.8 SL) at 24.45%”
e2“at the research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India”
Claim · model-written summary
The PRS treatment (chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC) recorded the lowest avoidable loss in cowpea, 13.49%.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0
- Treatment
- PRS treatment (chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC)e3
- Interactor
- pest complexe0pest
- Outcome
- avoidable losse3
- Direction
- loweste3
- Value
- 13.49%e3
- Setting
- research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Indiae2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“to evaluate the yield losses caused by a pest complex on cowpea”
e3“The lowest avoidable loss was recorded in the PRS treatment (chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC) at 13.49%”
e2“at the research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India”
Claim · model-written summary
The PTS treatment (imidacloprid 17.8 SL and chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC) increased cowpea seed yield over control by 69.24%, the highest increase.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0
- Treatment
- PTS (imidacloprid 17.8 SL and chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC)e3
- Interactor
- pest complexe0pest
- Outcome
- seed yielde3
- Direction
- increasee3
- Value
- 69.24%e3
- Comparator
- controle3
- Setting
- research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Indiae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“to evaluate the yield losses caused by a pest complex on cowpea”
e3“The treatment PTS (imidacloprid 17.8 SL and chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC) showed the highest increase in cowpea seed yield over control, with a 69.24% increase”
e2“at the research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India”
Claim · model-written summary
The PRS treatment (chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC) increased cowpea seed yield over control by 46.29%.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0
- Treatment
- PRSe4
- Interactor
- pest complexe0pest
- Outcome
- seed yielde3
- Direction
- increasee4
- Value
- 46.29%e4
- Comparator
- controle3
- Setting
- research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Indiae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“to evaluate the yield losses caused by a pest complex on cowpea”
e3“The treatment PTS (imidacloprid 17.8 SL and chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC) showed the highest increase in cowpea seed yield over control, with a 69.24% increase”
e4“followed by PRS with a 46.29% increase”
e2“at the research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India”
Claim · model-written summary
The PVS treatment exhibited the lowest yield increase in cowpea, 27.83%.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0
- Treatment
- PVS treatmente5
- Interactor
- pest complexe0pest
- Outcome
- yield increasee5
- Direction
- loweste5
- Value
- 27.83%e5
- Setting
- research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Indiae2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“to evaluate the yield losses caused by a pest complex on cowpea”
e5“Conversely, the PVS treatment exhibited the lowest yield increase at 27.83%”
e2“at the research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India”
Claim · model-written summary
The PTS treatment gave the maximum cowpea seed yield, 1049.70 kg ha⁻¹.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0
- Treatment
- PTS treatmente6
- Interactor
- pest complexe0pest
- Outcome
- yielde6
- Direction
- Maximume6
- Value
- 1049.70 kg ha⁻¹e6
- Setting
- research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Indiae2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“to evaluate the yield losses caused by a pest complex on cowpea”
e6“Maximum yield of 1049.70 kg ha⁻¹ was achieved with the PTS treatment”
e2“at the research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India”
Claim · model-written summary
The NP treatment gave the lowest cowpea yield, 620.40 kg ha⁻¹.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0
- Treatment
- NP treatmente7
- Interactor
- pest complexe0pest
- Outcome
- yielde6
- Direction
- loweste7
- Value
- 620.40 kg ha⁻¹e7
- Setting
- research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Indiae2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“to evaluate the yield losses caused by a pest complex on cowpea”
e6“Maximum yield of 1049.70 kg ha⁻¹ was achieved with the PTS treatment”
e7“while the lowest 620.40 kg ha⁻¹ in the NP treatment”
e2“at the research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India”
Claim · model-written summary
The PVS treatment yielded 793.10 kg ha⁻¹ of cowpea.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0
- Treatment
- PVSe3
- Interactor
- pest complexe0pest
- Outcome
- yielde6
- Value
- 793.10 kg ha⁻¹e3
- Setting
- research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Indiae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“to evaluate the yield losses caused by a pest complex on cowpea”
e6“Maximum yield of 1049.70 kg ha⁻¹ was achieved with the PTS treatment”
e2“at the research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India”
e3“The PVS and PRS treatments yielded 793.10 kg ha⁻¹ and 908.20 kg ha⁻¹, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The PRS treatment yielded 908.20 kg ha⁻¹ of cowpea.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0
- Treatment
- PRSe3
- Interactor
- pest complexe0pest
- Outcome
- yielde6
- Value
- 908.20 kg ha⁻¹e3
- Setting
- research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Indiae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“to evaluate the yield losses caused by a pest complex on cowpea”
e6“Maximum yield of 1049.70 kg ha⁻¹ was achieved with the PTS treatment”
e2“at the research farm of Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India”
e3“The PVS and PRS treatments yielded 793.10 kg ha⁻¹ and 908.20 kg ha⁻¹, respectively”
The same questions in other papers
chlorantraniliprole · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →imidacloprid · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.